Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

mtm78

Alpha Tester
  • Content Сount

    19,378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    6105

Everything posted by mtm78

  1. I need new hax my stets are not going up
  2. Do you share hax pack with non NESI scrubs? I would like new WASD hax my last one doesn't work in 0.6.0. Also my minimap.exe is sometimes throwing 1d-10t errors, but that might be a pebcak issue.
  3. mtm78

    BB's ruined this game

    Always situational. How much hp you got left? How is your heal? How much HE focus are you getting?
  4. mtm78

    How the "majority" of non-forum players see RDF/RL

    After the Q&A I am actually unsure if I want to quit playing. Them admitting that RDF on live is basically just a test and that they would remove it if it would be to widespread and to influential... Same goes for the comments about IJN DD's. No longer are they claiming it's just because they are more skill demanding, they actually admitted there might be an issue, that they are tracking it and that when more statistical data is gathered they will look at implementing changes ( they already had idea's on what to do, but need more data to see what is actually applicable and on which ships ).
  5. mtm78

    [12.6.0] Aslain's WoWS ModPack Installer

    Hope you feel better, I got the flue to right now
  6. mtm78

    BB's ruined this game

    IFHE means more HE spam and you still have a fire chance? IFHE best skill in tree Also IFHE + DE + flags is still ok No I think this was debunked later. Same fire chance for penetrating or nonpenetrating HE afaik.
  7. mtm78

    Radio Location Skill Feedback

    After the Q&A I actually understand it a bit better, they will change it ( I hope... eventually! ) but PT doesn't give enough statistical data. See it as a bug test, any serious problems with the implementation of the new skills would be shown there. But they won't really be able to judge the impact on gameplay thought PT sessions.
  8. mtm78

    BB's ruined this game

    It affects sigma as well as 'fixes' trajectory ( like shooting over hills when you target a ship behind it instead of straight into the scenery ). Easy to observe in a training room ps sigma is vertical dispersion -> range, so you're not wrong. I don't think it changes horizontal dispersion but I could be wrong.
  9. mtm78

    BB's ruined this game

    I would also think about the actual built in target lock which greatly enhances dispersion ( try shooting a ship without target lock and without )
  10. mtm78

    How the "majority" of non-forum players see RDF/RL

    100% true, IFHE will be the best skill on any 155mm and - cruisers, looking at the Belfast and Kutuzov builds Flamu played. IFHE on Akizuki is also pure porn as you can finally deal with higher tier DD's. And no one says the skill kills gameplay entirely. It just kills flanking / stealth ' abuse ' against BBKevin's. And it's a wrong direction to take the game in. And yes all DD's should have it. Torpedo DD's because they can avoid gun boat's and gunboat DD's so they can hunt torpedo DD's. Edit -> which is another reason why I don't like it, WG says they want to give more choices but so far all good players I know are all saying it's mandatory on all DD's.
  11. mtm78

    BB's ruined this game

    ^^ this. Naval simulator would not attract the playerbase WoWs has right now. The gameplay would be for many to slow paced. And most people don't think 3% hit ratio really fun on their battleships edit: ps I been playing some Atlantic Fleet lately, it's turn based but does simulate naval encounters a lot more accurate including better target resolutions after each salvo when firing on the same ship.
  12. mtm78

    The World of Warships ModStation!

    WG / Lesta is developing modAPI which should fix the update issue. Smoke counter and damage meter mods which both use modAPI did not need updating for instance due to this. But for UI mods, this isn't possible yet since they are not supported by WG ( flash files need xml edits which is actually the biggest ' patches ' after an update, even if the base flash file isn't changed ).
  13. mtm78

    Radio Location Skill Feedback

    Sub_Octavian said in the Q&A that they will remove it if too many people use it and it changes the meta.......
  14. mtm78

    How the "majority" of non-forum players see RDF/RL

    Fiji has excellent stealth so yeah you could but I had no issues without RDF to hunt DD's. But I am probably not the best to ask I guess as I don't even think the skill was needed. In Fiji I would just support allied DD's and they would be the spotters, and I would help secure/deny cap zone's. On the other hand, after hearing WG will remove RDF if to many people are using it: YES USE IT ON FIJI. EVEN USE IT ON YOUR CARRIERS
  15. mtm78

    How the "majority" of non-forum players see RDF/RL

    Radar cruisers could have benefit from RDF but not sure on Chappy I think you need CE for stealth firing so I am not sure. There are a lot of different builds possible and I won't say you should take it. But I would take it on a Fletcher for sure. Zao with RL also sounds counter intuitive you're long range HE spammer imo. Mogami, if you can also have a full stealth built and use the 155's with RL you could be a nice DD hunter maybe See, I'm not sure either. But saying it's useless across the board is so very wrong. Especially if you have a fletcher/gearing and make that statement. When I played on PT I skipped AFT on both and got nice builds with RL and just hunted/secured cap zone's. I lost ONE game with USN DD's, and that was my first Fletcher game where I yolo'd behind an enemy Shima which beat me in a gun fight ( *picture me blushing out off shame.. I did not expect to lose that fight but I did, and with a BIG margin* ). edit: For me it's not the skill on it's own, it's the skill in combination with some other skills ( especially those which buff BBKevin ) and then the explanation behind them. DD hunters ( some cruisers -> most won't take RPF / RL w/e they call it now, because there are better builds like for Zao which isn't meant to hunt DD's anyway ). Then gunboat DD's which hunt DD's -> USN DD's mainly ( and some GE maybe ), and those don't need buffs to hunt IJN DD's more succesfully, Fletcher and Gearing already outperform IJN on that tier by some margin ). Then WG admits it's for late game scenario where ship has to deal with enemies with better concealment. This means -> BBKevin which sniped like a baddie behind his team surviving whole game doing nothing of importance ( bad BB player -> BBKevin \ BBSteve from WoT where he drives an IS7 ) and now he is given another tool so he can still live a bit longer and not feel as helpless ( like he makes his team feel because they lack proper BB support ). And at the same time they say: BB's are a problem, there are to many and they live to long. And we want to make the game more dynamic. How would it be more dynamic when they just have given a tool to BBKevin to feel like it's not that bad to be alone with a death team as he will have this nice indicator showing where to expect enemy to show up from? It is counterintuitive, but sadly there are way more BBKevin's then decent players so they want to keep the BBKevin's happy so they can keep paying. And in a way it's fine, it's not like the skill breaks everything in a way which would make BBKevin suddenly win over a decent player. But it does make IJN DD's even less attractive then they were before, which I don't like. Q&A from today had a nice surprise though. No longer are they saying: it's 100% fine IJN just has higher skill requirement and the players suck ( this is what they said before ). Now they say they are monitoring it and will change things if needed, but they need more statistical data. They even said they will remove RPF / RL if they see it's used to much and it changes meta. Which almost convinces me to hold off in my uninstall on the 22nd... not 100% sure right now, the Q&A was more positive than I expected.
  16. mtm78

    How the "majority" of non-forum players see RDF/RL

    You mean it, and most people in chat there are unicum players and they all said you were wrong. Just like your comment on AR. Maybe their opinions should make you reconsider your stance on things a bit? And what I said above seems to go for you to. RDF isn't meant for ARP Myoko so not finding it usefull isn't really surprising
  17. mtm78

    1 YEAR and still crappy, laggy port

    75fps res\engine_config.xml renderer section ( top of file ). Chrome tabs kill port UI responsiveness, especially watching video through a flash element, html5 has almost no effect.
  18. mtm78

    How the "majority" of non-forum players see RDF/RL

    There is no Fletcher in that quote.... So come again? And thinking RDF is a bad thing for Fletcher's to start with It has nothing to do with my stats, but it seems to have everything to do with your lacking understanding of the game. edit: see, this one gets it. Why don't you? edit2: and stop trying to make it look like I ' whine ' about this one skill, I explained it a couple of times already it's not just this skill it's the catering to BBKevin and the PR spin about about it, showing WG doesn't understand their own meta or just doesn't care about dynamic gameplay. It might work out though, IFHE is showing the BBKevin whine about HE + fire might still be better then HE with higher pen values
  19. mtm78

    How the "majority" of non-forum players see RDF/RL

    You were saying this just not in Flamu's chat as well and got flamed for being a troll... coincidence?
  20. mtm78

    How the "majority" of non-forum players see RDF/RL

    I concur, it alone isn't a deal breaker. It, in conjunction with the pr spin for the introduction of it, and the other changes to hold on to more BBKevin's, all added up together.. and with the knowledge that it won't change a bit no in fact it will just get worse.....
  21. mtm78

    BB's ruined this game

    Because you're talking with BBKevin.
  22. mtm78

    How the "majority" of non-forum players see RDF/RL

    Read that quote again, there is no fletcher in it. And then think about which DD's have things to fear from this skill crutch. edit: and I don't think you're funny really, as I mostly think you're either purposely missing the point or unable to get the point. Both would be rather sad imo.
  23. mtm78

    How the "majority" of non-forum players see RDF/RL

    Oww you, didn't you hear? WG has stated IJN DD's are perfectly fine and are just demanding more skill
  24. IJN just has higher skill requirement don't you get it Seriously WG, you're a bit nutters lately
×