mtm78

Forumites channel, I guess you can find it Pepsi... you want to show me how you support your allied DD's using a CA with the same concealment as a same tier BB Or do you want want to escort the BB's with an AAA cruiser while there aren't any CV's around? Maybe the absence of CV's might explain the overabundance of battleships ps. Don't currently have a tier 7 battleship, but maybe you can show me your support while I take out my DD's.

Done crying Hubert buddy?

1. 100% correct, and yes we do have more very bad BB players then other classes, and the reasons are quite clear and simple: BB's attract more players who think they are easy mode ( lots of hp, lots of armor, big guns -> must be stronk! ). BB's are also the most forgiving class in the game if you want to perform semi decent, but granted they are one of the harder classes to really excel in. The we have two of the most popular premiums being Scharnhorst and Tirpitz which also help a lot. 2. Some cruisers are bad, without a doubt. But even good cruisers can't move up currently and support allied DD's because their allied BB's camp to far back and the cruisers would get focused. This is partly due to static meta ( applicable to whole playerbase ) but also partly because of the bad BB's mentioned in 1 who rather snipe with a spotter plane in their German battleships then use them as they are meant to be used. 3. Ofc, some DD's are bad, just as 2 and just as 1. But yes, DD's often lack close up cruiser support due to point 2. Is this ALL the fault of the bad BB players? No it isn't. It's also due to overpopularity of BB's causing a higher percentage of bad BB players to be present in most matches, in conjunciton with there being just to many BB's in most matches to start with. Cruisers don't do that well pushing up to support allied destroyers even if you have good BB's on your team who aren't that far behind. Because then you will have good BB's on enemy team which realize that taking out the cruisers trying to take out their allied destroyers takes preference over dealing damage to the enemy battleships. The BB heavy meta is the cause of the static gameplay, and in part this battleship heavy meta is caused by the ' BBaby' issue. The other part is BB's just being popular as a class, mostly I think because CV's in mid tiers aren't as powerful as they should be.

Keep those coming man please. Also I will be waiting for the cruiser replay of you supporting your BB's as you should! I am sure I won't be the only one

I kind of distinguish between some clan tags and others, if you see [sCRUBS] you better support them because if not the game is lost by default

So that would be you with your 22 DD games? Compared with your 13xx BB games? Yup.. You got 600 battles in a cruiser, show us some replays on how you SHOULD play a cruiser please.... Ow wait....

No this is about performance not preference... For next round we should even stricter define performance, as in 1v1 performance ( have to kill ) or tactical performance ( has better concealment so can disengage and go for cap points ).

Tier VI cruisers are fine mate, why are you having so much issues with them?

Plox come to Forumites in game chat channel so we can division up, I would love to have the same BB behavior in my games as you say you been seeing since christmas! And if nothing else, you be the aggressive BB and I can take something which you think should support you from close up

Do you even lift bro?

Blasphemy! You can fight ANYTHING

BB;s need to learn to manage repair and heal and stop cowering in the back because of a non issue. WG even posted damage distribution charts and the biggest source of dmg on BB's is AP yet you never hear them whine about it.

How can cruisers support allied DD's and engage enemy DD's when BB's camp so far behind them they ( edit for clarity -> they THE CRUISERS ) get focused by all enemy BB's?

A leander in the enemy team kited my Molotov into his torps, I knew they were coming but I couldn't turn enough when I noticed them to late and I died. I congratulated him: Nice, Nice torps o7. No response, guess he was a bit busy as he did die right when I typed that ( he was on really low hp and I was greedy for that kill since game was already won and about to end and I just wanted to get that rear turret aligned.. ).

We're down 2 caps, and they almost got 1000 points, I spot a BB on the 2 line, I ask "can you be more useless?" him: "stfu noob, I help carrier!" me: "no, actually I helped the CV because I prevented Kamikaze from going for him, and went after the Gaede which the CV killed with a bomb" him: "stfu shitter bot, go back to sims" Yes, I am a shitter bot that is why I get more xp on a loss then the top guy on the enemy team in a win I can also see how helpful he was in 'protecting our carrier' BB's are not always the problem, but the problem with BB's is that IF there is a bad player in them it's always so hilarious how they think they been useful.

Yes and you also knew for sure that distracted the enemy team and they lost but they would have won otherwise

I just had some 44% Tirpitz shitter push me out of my smoke on purpose because I am a 'cheater' and I shouldn't 'camp' in smoke with a cruiser

Not on this forum as it might allow the dev's to actually think fires+he are a big big problem for poor BB's and they need to be removed from the game all together, just like CV's which have no place in the game at all since IRL battles were about battleships shooting other battleships. But I think I finally got your point

Thanks for agreeing with me...

No no this thread is NOT about 1v1 comparisons since Belfast / Flint / Fiji would then also not be able to use their smokes ( no spotters ). At least that is what I was told I think we should have a more strict setup for next thread

This so much this. So many useless cammo's in those crates, who the heck would skimp out on detectability or dispersion bonus for a couple of k ingame credits

I except EVERYONE'S view, as long as it's supported by arguments and not just 'because I say so'. And you got a strange sense of humor if you think it's 'funny' to claim people are toxic. Right click -> ignore messages. Done edit: and this is option number 2 -> ( or 1, depending on personal preferences and time of day since reports are finite ).

How do you know what he said in team chat? How do you know team would have won otherwise? This is EXACTLY what I mean, so many people posting assumptions instead of sticking to the facts. edit: and if people annoy you -> right click -> ignore.