mtm78
-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Everything posted by mtm78
-
True, tier 8 / 9 / 10 have increased dmg per flooding tick, it could be ok there. But any lower tiers it is a flat out buff to BB's ( again ). Or am I missing something, please tell me I am missing something...
-
Good point. Confrontation aka ' what if ' battles off nation vs nation could be ' fun '. Did you guys see OMNI-Freedom vs OMNI-Masochists game where they did USN vs IJN? Wasn't 100% serious and some balancing issues would surely arise but it was entertaining to watch
-
Has the "Inertia Fuse for HE Shells" skill made Heavy Cruisers Redundant?
mtm78 replied to Procrastes's topic in General Discussion
I hear you got manual AAA on your Zao as well -
I should just ignore everything he writes, it's constant the same 'quality' of responses he gives
-
Welcome to EU forums So this means, buffing BB's in order to claim it's a buff to IJN DD's because they aren't that affected by the BB buff? Wow..... Those damage changes, can you give them per 'tick' instead of based on a full duration flooding?
-
Has the "Inertia Fuse for HE Shells" skill made Heavy Cruisers Redundant?
mtm78 replied to Procrastes's topic in General Discussion
Didn't Flamu take it on his CurrySausage Overall I think IFHE is great, BB's complained about HE + fires being broken, now we get lower fire chance ( no matter how you twist it, it IS a lower fire chance... even if it is just 1%, and that reduction in potential fire damage is BY FAR compensated by the higher HE damage you deal. Maybe the BB captains will now ask for the fire chance to be restored and IFHE to be changed. Without IFHE Akizuki has no way to deal with angled DD's, I don't want to changed. But instead of having flat effects it could be a scaled effect. -
German Jagdtiger and Tiger tanks vs T34's... even if the Russian tanks had far superior numbers, no one wanted to be the first guy in because you would die, always, without any doubt. You had to swarm the German tanks, just as in real life, and you would take heavy casualties, just as they did in real life. Result: everyone queued up in German tanks. Human psychology 101 I guess As to applying this to WoWs, fleet's normally would only engage if they had a clear advantage. No nation committed to 'fair fights' and rightly so So as I said, I think the only way to implement historical engagements would be in PvE scenario's and I think WG has said to be working on those
-
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
Blyskawica 18 + 1 = 19 Belfast 18 - 3 = 15 Scharnhorst : 9 Sure I will, it's allowed -
National battles were removed from WoT with a good reason. But maybe we can get some 'semi historical' campaigns in PvE setting, that would be nice
-
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
Kek so you are triggered by someone doing what is intended in this topic? You know,that rule you don't want me to repeat every time but which you seem to not really understand? -
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
No, this thread works more like a popularity contest, the more people who perform better in a certain ship and the more who not perform in another, well one ship goes up the other goes down. There is no limit on how many times anyone can cast a vote, other then the 24h rule. So why you getting triggered? Or better yet, why are you coming here in the first place? Tell the thread starter he should make different rules for the next one, or better yet, since you think it's childish, stay the heck out of it to start with. Which is the intent of the thread, if two people cancel eachother out then it's up to another person to break the stalemate. Did you read OP? Did you partake in the previous rounds? Maybe you're in the wrong thread. -
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
He could just vote to cancel me out and boost his better performing ship instead of getting triggered over nothing. You know, which is the original intend of the topic. No one is being blamed for voting how they do, as long as they follow the rules ( and their math is correct ). -
Why is there no demand from the comunity to buff the German DDs to a competitive state
mtm78 replied to BananaJoeJo's topic in Destroyers
It's seal clubbing I know... but it's not a bad seal clubber -
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
edit: you should keep your crying out of this thread so we can continue to vote as intended..... -
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
Go cry somewhere else ghostbuster_ I'm not breaking any rules -
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
Rules allow voting once per 24h, so stfu? And why you don't mention everyone else who been voting more then YOU seem to think they should? You feeling lonely? Need some company? Sorry you're not my type.... -
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
So that is why you win more games with Blys then with Belfast, because it's clearly not any better -
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
Blyskawica 20 + 1 = 21 Best firehose in the game. Belfast 22 - 3 = 19 It's a light cruiser which utility is mainly centered around consumables... in randoms it's not a carry ship Scharnhorst :13 -
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Touche -
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
I would love to see you play ' non static ' in your cruisers in a game with 6+ BB's -
Use this thread -> http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/58026-mod0601-wg-modpack-full-version-v60/ as it has up to date links. Even links to RU installer when WG hasn't finished EN translation of the installer
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
You said the game is not static because BB's were pushing. I say: even if so, cruisers can't do the same. And now you say we have different views on what static gameplay is. Looked like you meant BB meta isn't static because you can push in with a BB. But if I say that it's static because you can't with a cruiser, you say we have different views on what static gameplay means -
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Owww noo that aint true. In the glorious age of BT ( Before Tirpitz ) we had plenty of games with 2 or 3 BB's max per side. False. BB's might push ( in those rare occasions where the planters align correctly ) but cruisers can't. So if you think it's fine, you're just saying you think cruisers should be played static -
It doesn't translate sorry, keeps being gibberish bbaby talk
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
The irony
