mtm78
-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Everything posted by mtm78
-
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
Seems Belfast has won 1. Belfast 2. Błyskawica 3. Scharnhorst- 452 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- Elimination
- Elimination thread
- (and 1 more)
-
Haven't had a single DC, and I got probably worse hardware then any decent/recent gaming pc. ( 3770 + hd7850 2gb + 16gb ). PC is more then just hardware though. Did you run WGCheck while reporting the issue with WG's support?
-
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
Ow man jesus just got back from the dentist I was a bit fuzzy still Seems we should get a definitive vote today btw -
This is very true. I just tried to keep going since I would like to unlock and buy my RU DD's before the split. I also had some very good matches in Kiev ( or well, I felt I was doing my part ), the issue is when you get teams which think Kiev is a DD and who expect me to rush into a cap right after spawn with some IJN DD's on the enemy team.... Then I am either forced to go in and most likely take heavy damage limiting how I can play in mid to late game, or I just die. Or I don't push for a cap and my team get's salty because they have ' coward DD's '. Then the other ship I am grinding is the Donskoi and while I like it it's very easy to misplay in it. And after a personal misplay in Donskoi jumping in Kiev and getting people who think I should run head first in cap zone's while we have a Yugumo and Kagero on our team which are spamming their torps from outside of cap... easy to get a bit salty
-
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
Blyska 4 + 3 = 7 Belfast 12 - 1 = 11 Almost forgot my daily vote Overall I am in agreement with how the elimination progressed, yes I admit I have a thing for Blys because she is so easy to play decently in, and Belfast while strong is much more situational imho, but I think Belfast will win ( just not sure if it would really be 100% based on performance or rather we also have quite a lot of people who are voting out of love for RN CL's ). -
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
We could always exclude a ship like Imperator from the list, especially if we add and enforce the rule that people can only vote on ships they played ( Nikolai is still kind of rare so it wouldn't win if only owners could vote for it ). So, you could up or downvote ships you played, but if you haven't played them you can't vote on them. And then formally allow people like Trainspite to vote just on one ship while being forced to also apply the -3 to another ship? Not really sure of how it exactly should work, but as long as we have an open discussion prior and then keep to the agreed upon rules it should both work and be more 'flexible' ( or restrictive if that's the way the discussion goes ). I think it's more a 'fun fact' that the 3 finalists are all premiums -
How many games does it take you to notice it's a 'bad day' and not 'a few bad games back to back'? I struggle with that lately myself, kept playing throughout some sessions where I really should have just quit ( and I don't mean because of bad external influences, just that I myself was playing like crap ).
-
Split Topic: Gameplay > World of Cowards yes i said it.
mtm78 replied to Alphaburner's topic in Archive
1. I never said BB's are overpowered I said there are to many of them ( which you like, as you would like World of Battleships, without CV's even, by your own words ). 2. And while I am a cruiser main I perform equally well or better in most of the BB's I play. I am a BAD BB player and yet they are my highest win rate class... Next 'argument' please? -
Split Topic: Gameplay > World of Cowards yes i said it.
mtm78 replied to Alphaburner's topic in Archive
So it is your personal insecurity about not liking how your opinions are weighed, and you do try to make it personal since you seem to be on a crusade against me personally while you don't even try to respond to -> As I said dude, it's getting a bit pathetic. Especially since you continuously want to disregard what this person has written IS being responded to. By taking into account his profile off course, to weed out the stupid and biased people who do tend to post a lot on this forum -
I know you don't like me and would like this to be about 'making it personal by looking at a person's profile' but you fail to see the actual relevance of the text in the OP and this person's profile. Really man, it's becoming a bit of a bad habit of yours.
-
For continued failure to stay on topic and instead trying to make it personal again -> I doubt it very much. Could be wrong though, but then again no one could ever know since OP likes calling people cowards while he hides his profile. ^^^^ Quoted for relevance again
-
Stop crying about profiles being relevant steviln.
-
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
You used -5 instead of -3.- 452 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Elimination
- Elimination thread
- (and 1 more)
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Well that would make Marblehead less of a worse Murmansk so it's a good thing -
How about calling people cowards while hiding your stats? If you want to call my dismissal 'elitism' you're way of the mark but hey don't let the truth stop you Profiles don't only show performance, they also indicate trends -> classes played and survival rate's / hit ratios and such can give a reasonable insight into a players playstyle, which is quite relevant in regards to the opening post. edit: it's also 'funny' you quote me and don't use your same 'diagnostic capabilities' in regard to the second post I quoted? Personal issues perhaps?
-
Two days ago I had 28% win rate for my session... and two of those wins were in division with someone who carried me ( well I came second in the team in one of those games but still ). RNGesus did not like me, and I was a bit titled I guess due to personal real life stuff. Playing for 'performance' when titled never works for me, I need to be able to concentrate/focus on the game if I want to perform decently. Strange thing was I had good/great WTR but lousy win rate, normally I dismiss WTR and pad myself on the back for doing my damage where it's needed to get a win, this time it looked I was just doing damage without thinking to much about the flow of the battle :/
-
Why the private profile? Ow ok thanks, forgot to check 3rd party sites
-
You know this thread is making me more salty in game when playing on this map, doesn't matter what people say there is always someone who thinks otherwise. This map, and most others, is won by a majority following a plan, I've won without taking A or C and just controlling B and killing both groups from enemy team who split up ( rare occasion but it happened ), I've won losing all 3 caps and killing all enemies slowly, and I've lost in both those same ways to. But I don't like so much 'chance' so I really try and get people to follow one plan/method. Which isn't what randoms is for, so shame on me for even trying
-
Which forum members have you seen in random battles?
mtm78 replied to Cobra6's topic in General Discussion
Which is an acronym and a display or proper humor. But then again I do like the Brits -> -
Which forum members have you seen in random battles?
mtm78 replied to Cobra6's topic in General Discussion
Yeah that was the good match edit: wait wasn't that in my Kiev? Complimented the both of you, without you the game would have been lost for sure! Let's agree to disagree ( again ) -
If your math is correct I would say you're 100% right! Not sure where this puts German DD's right now though as afaik they are also more dependent on their torpedo output then their gun damage, so this would be a quite heavy nerf for them.
-
Which forum members have you seen in random battles?
mtm78 replied to Cobra6's topic in General Discussion
No I don't but I do know that Ebola is a disease which killed 11 310 people at least last year. Maybe the acronym is 'funny', but as I said you can call me old fashioned as it falls outside of what I would call humor. Now this is humor I can understand... and relate to. I <3 bewbs! -
Which forum members have you seen in random battles?
mtm78 replied to Cobra6's topic in General Discussion
Which game was that? I can remember two I think with you in them, both times in BB division, one game I played all right the other I got caught broadside to a Hindenburg at 14km which send me to port with one salvo Call me old fashioned but I would have never approved of such a tag ( no matter the people behind it ). Next clan will be [CANCER] or is that a no-no because it's a disease which also kills a lot of people in the ' 'Western' world? -
Try deleting the files in your \Updates folder ( NOT UpdatesData!!! ) this sometimes helps if there is a partial update file which can't be resumed. Also make sure you got enough free space
-
Has the "Inertia Fuse for HE Shells" skill made Heavy Cruisers Redundant?
mtm78 replied to Procrastes's topic in General Discussion
You are right, no difference with pen or non pen HE for fire chance ( Sub_Octavion's words ).