mtm78

Gremmy is certainly OP in comparison with Gnevny.. I mean it can stealth fire, has the old VMF concealment penalty when firing, the old HE damage and the old HE fire chance all the while having the same stronk AP. But slow turrets does confine it to good player who can plan ahead a bit. You can't always stay at 9.9km+ and stealth fire. The point was that Blys imho is just as capable tier for tier as Gremmy is, even more for me.

Only.... :

Stop spreading FUD Yeah, got no issues hitting them just means a bit more lead than usual. You mean you don't have a Gremmy? Exact same 'problem' but it doesn't seem to hurt it's OP status much Ow, for me Blys is more overpowered then Gremmy, according to win rate. Must be a reason for it

Uhm..... Ships have always been displayed on minimap before showing up on screen. That is why at range you can dodge so well if ships try to shoot you which were concealed but not in invisi fire range ( as you suddenly see them pop up on the minimap since they break concealment by shooting, than your right click look if shells are coming your way and evade ).

Was already corrected, but Blys with CE can stealth fire from a LOT closer And 16 torps is once per 4m+. But yeah I would use Leni/Blys/Belfast/Sims but maybe I can try Shira as well. Won't do much good with many Belfast though as hydro will ruin the 16 torp wall salvo's unless they are bad. And I expect lots of those Belfast's.

There is no problem, just a 'potential problem'. I have more issues with the 'potential problem' of WG giving away Fletchers with radar..........

Blys beats that with better gun's and more range.

Exactly, so even if multi queuing would be an issue, which it isn't, this 'fix' wouldn't fix anything and just discriminate against clan members ( perhaps even cause them go have longer queue times, al to 'fix' a potential abuse... ).

Again this is an empty statement. There is no 'FIX' since according to -> .. there is no issue.

Yes, I am terribly sorry I guess I sounded like an arse Are you two using the same payment provider?

There are sometimes issues with certain payment providers, try using a different one. Since I'm from The Netherlands I can always use IDEAL which so far has always worked, but I know that for instance some of the prepaid cards don't always work.

So? Forum can't help him. If the charges are deducted and he can PROOF that to support they will fix it. If he only claims without offering proof ofc they can't help him. What do you think forum can do for him?

http://heavy.com/tech/2015/03/best-laptop-cooling-pad-cooler-fan-accessories/

^^... OP, click on SUPPORT on top of the page here and open a ticket with them. Forum can not help you with payment issues

The issue is that YOU see this, and others without a doubt, but WG does not. And player morals are not the same as game rules. So the only problem is perhaps being worked up about something which is a non issue ( unless it IS an issue, but then it would be clearly visible through replays ). But I guess you don't have a replay? So what happens when I would multi queue with friends? Without clan tags? Or who are in another clan? Your solution would just punish a select few, and not really address / fix any existing issue.

It also happens to people without mods, but yes being stuck in loading screen is a common occurrence if you have faulty mods.

Look at that scrub, didn't even carry me

I think Blys might be a contender

Discussions are not wars, even though on this forum it sometimes seems that way But have a hug if you need one

When match starts loading, server is already done with MM and creating room -> clients starts loading assets and when those are loaded it should just enter the match instance. So either the client fails to load something which it thinks is needed to start the game, or there is still another 'magical' packet which needs to be send from either server or client before it actually shows the battle screen ( ship screen ). I don't think there is a magical packet after match is created, as we had multiple instances before in CBT for instance that everyone would load into battle but we could not move because the server crashed. So I don't think it's a server issue, it's something in the client during the loading of assets prior to the game.

There are things Kiev just can't do, mainly going for caps in early game. But Kiev seems to do more damage then my Blys and my Leni and my Sims, those guns are just excellent!

Leagues would be nice, there are community organized events going on which work like this in a way ( well the tier 6 uses an ELO ranking afaik, the others are just elimination rounds ). For randoms it will never happen. And in general I don't feel it's a really bad issue. Mostly because MM should, by totally ignoring any player related statistics, come to an about equal distribution of games where your team is stronger vs your team being weaker then the enemy team ( I think... ).

Where is your replay? Would like to see it And even if they played terrible, there is no law against playing bad. Evidence of rigging would be sailing to the middle of the map never using guns or anything and not evading anything ( and even then, maybe he got disconnected? ). And in the end, you DID mention the clan tag, so you DID try to name and shame them. If you just wanted to start a generic discussion about the possibilities of rigging through multi queuing you could have done so without mentioning a specific clan. There is a forum rule about naming and shaming, and I expect this thread to get closed because you broke it No ( and yes ). If WG is ok when they are on opposite teams, this implies they are ok if they are on the same as well ( as there is no control over that aspect, MM ignores player data and only looks at ships.. which means you have higher chance of being in the same team when you queue up in complementing divisions instead of likewise divisions ). This is a fallacy. If you omit the need for evidence then nothing would ever be done and we could all talk until christmas and eastern come on the same day without any effect. But yes, a semi accident is hard to proof, but blatant rigging is not ( remember Jingles video on the WoT rigging... that was RIGGING with capitals, clearly visible for everyone ). WG could always monitor everything you do in the game, and if you would use in game voice chat then I assume they have the right to monitor this ( if it's in the EULA ? ). BUT this is not even an issue because in game chat isn't extended over multiple divisions. And I am doubting you're asking WG to 'monitor' every players teamspeak or discord conversations, as that would be .... uhm... really never ever going to be legal So you would have lost anyway.

Well yeah if you approach it like that then everything they do is 'fine'. I'm still glad I feel like a DD with radar would be ->

Leni is gun and zoom/boom, use the speed to do run's at ships you know you can take or just shoot stuff at a bit longer range and make use of pretty good evasion tanking ability. Also, Leni has crap turret angles on the 4th turret iirc, or the 3rd. Idk, but plenty of times only capable of shooting with 4 or even just 3 guns out of 5.