mtm78

Sorry if I take his and my own opinion which obviously matches over yours. edit: and if you can't understand that Black is WAY MORE BROKEN then Belfast, then ... just.... A quote from Flamu: ... and it is. As Flamu says, you counter EVERY enemy DD period. And you think that's not broken edit2: and those torps.... LOL WG... Constant nerfs to IJN torps range and now this?

So Imperator also isn't broken because you don't meet many of them? So it's ok to ruin ONE game from the start just because you had the bad luck there is a DD with radar on the enemy team?

If it's not cruiser like concealment it's still bad. Belfast has .2km less radar range then concealment and no torpedo's at all. Imagine Belfast with 9.2km torpedo's as well, then you have something like a Fletcher ( though ofc Fletchers main armament has lower dpm... )

I should say the same ->

I didn't mean it's 'new', I reckon lots of people will actually do this just as they do for randoms. And clan tags are one thing, I know plenty of people from different clans I can hop on their ts and no one would know we were even talking. All this blatant slandering off clans over just 'potential' abuse is truly beyond me. Previous threads like these were closed pretty quickly, here the OP is still up with the insinuations that there was something 'unfair' going on.

Yes we do, it looks like it has a lower hitpoint pool and different torpedo's. Not really anything which could balance a Baltimore radar on a DD.

Even when people do count in's for ranked, the chances of being in opposite teams is about equal so the net gain would be negligible I think.

Upload the replays. While it's possible it's quite unlikely, and as such it's a statistical anomaly which might not feel 'normal' but they actually are. Just like flipping head 6 times out of 8, it's not 'abnormal' at all.

How often does that happen?

Tell me how I should contest cap zone's in my DD against an enemy DD with radar. There is no work around, it will lead to an increase of passive play by DD's facing one.

Only for the one's driving it.....

That is not average joe, average joe isn't terribad and has a 48% winrate or higher. 40% is terrible. I say I don't mind as long as it's about evenly distributed. This doesn't happen atm on some tiers, due to protected MM and also just because of tier population. I used to love playing tier 5, it has interesting ships and is quite a balanced tier imo. But due to protected MM you will get to be bottom tier facing tier 7 a disproportionately large amount. Nah, would be hard to reward people for the skill / effort they put in if people can 'choose' between normal and easy mode I think. Fact is that the playerbase is growing according to WG, and is behaving in line with 'seasonal fluctuations'. Trust me, they do care if they lose players or when growth isn't in line with expectations, more players means more money and more money is a good thing for most companies ->

1. They had longer range hydro, this was removed. 2. German DD's are generally seen as 'challenging', do you feel this applies to Fletcher as well? 3. Seeing how Fletcher is already the best tier 9 DD, adding consumables like radar ( which has a MUCH longer range then hydro, more then enough to drive DDs out of cap zone's seeing how it's mounted on a DD with good concealment ) will not make her much weaker. 4. It's the contesting zap zone's which long range radar kills off, you will simply see your allied DD's not even attempt it because they have no way to counter a DD with radar, it can spot them and they can't spot it back. This is not even similar to the first talks about German Hydro, and a long way off the actual live implementation of German DD's and their hydro. But we already know Fletcher, and so far no stats have been revealed showing it nerfed in any way ( not that it would make her really balanced.. ).

Type 1 and Type 2 cammo's you got from crates are basically worthless as Type 5 is the minimum I will use...

Yeah because it's impossible to say up front is a DD with radar would be 'balanced' right

I seen plenty of them, they aren't that much of an issue ( Belfast >>> Flint in most situations ).

RN cruisers? This game is tactical, you have cap zone's ( I wish they would remove standard battle completely.... ). RN cruisers are NOT the worst affected, it's the entire team as your DD's have no chance to contest cap zone's when there is an enemy Fletcher with radar.

Had no issues with loading into battle, did have two minor issues -> 1. Start of battles I could not use chat, pressing enter to open chat box had no effect. But sometime into a battle, it works normally :/ 2. Can't use top left menu for exiting game.( -> this one should be fixed now but I was using the installer from before the 12 o'clock patch Will install latest patch now

23m mostly from modules from ships I no longer have in port ( or from stock modules on ships I have elited ).

Port 80 for tcp seems... familiar Chat and voice for instance afaik use their own 'subsystem' hence their own ports.

Nice clan logo

WG seems to have put WG haxpack on my account, keep getting the baddies in my team edit: I should add, it's more that the 'players' on my team seem to decide to use the worst possible tactics every ffin game lately. And by absence of widespread XVM we get 45% plebs pinging map and getting whole team to follow them into useless positions.

Weren't the torpedo's nerved on Black in comparison with the normal Fletcher? Still sucks to have on on the enemy team if you're in a DD and have to contest caps against one. Any tournament can ban their use at their own leisure.

Even. Blys is an easier target for most, Leni is a pretty slim profile ( judging from in game experience, not looked at the models.. might be wrong but even if so Leni feels equal if not better in evasion tanking for me ).