-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mtm78
-
Agreed. I had BBabies complain I went to the other flank because both our DD's spawned there and no one was coming to our side.... like I would take my Donskoi and go spot for them edit: before BBabies get their knickers in a twitch or something, I got no issues hanging around the BB's and helping them with my radar against DD's but these BBabies actually pinged the map 10-15km in front of them and said I should go spot there Well... how about nope.gif followed by a kkthxbai.gif.
-
Read topic like these and fear for the future of humanity. After realizing you can't fix humanity, have a laugh and just continue with what you were doing before
-
LOL at calling official WG employee post crap
-
Sure. Unless a BBaby makes another whine topic, then all bets are off
-
Those tentacles were nice.. wrong genre but nice anyway
-
Don't forget to ask the data showing Belfast is 'balanced' as well
-
Omg another one of those whine topics ffs.... Counting in is not cheating. And there is a 20 or so second randomizer for ranked matches so even if you press battle at the exact same time it's no where near as often you might end up in the same match as with randoms. tldr: stop crying
-
idk either, there been community proposals made but all of them have flaws. I personally think it would help a lot of we had some tactical tutorials in the game for all classes. And perhaps even a system where 'good team play' would be actually rewarding. Take the current karma system and make it so people who get complimented on their plays actually gain something ( reports should not remove anything to prevent abuse ), remove the 7 daily report / compliment limit so people can always vote for someone to be rewarded for teamplay. And SHOW in the end screen if/how many compliments someone has gotten. I believe if people see their actions are being rewarded they will strive to do them more often. Not that this system is not without flaws but hey it's currently the only one I can think off which is semi viable.
-
WG makes both games, if they can add Swedish tanks in one game they can add Dutch navy in WoWs ( even while it would be low priority with the Italians still missing, the British only having a CL line and the French only having a single premium ). Btw, according to you, Poland wouldn't 'need' a ship as well. I welcome you to go tell that to people in the Polish section on the forum Satisfying a community request is also part of game development, which is what this thread is about.
-
2 contradicts 1 That is the main problem with BB's. I seen to many 45% BB's which still end somewhere in the top of their team because they live the longest and thus are able to get some kills on low hp ships and rack up some damage over time. Heck I even seen BB's which in the end game did an absolutely stellar job with shooting at enemies. But their win rate sucked non the less. Because, BB's are very important for winning games, their positioning is a deterrent to enemy cruisers, and not keeping the enemy cruisers from slaughtering your DD's is quite detrimental in relation to winning games. And most of the bad BB players are incapable of understanding it is THEM, that they are responsible for their bad win rate. Because, they aren't constantly ending up on the bottom of the team. They seem to conclude from that, that they are doing it right, and that they just keep getting bad / worse teams.
-
You play to win, anything which therefore wins games is 'playing for the team'. And he seemingly isn't bad at it either
-
In that tier X game in the review he got first blood by sneaking up on the enemy DD, idk but I wouldn't call that camping in the back
-
That is also hard, some ships are designed to brawl and some are more suited for medium engagements. I wouldn't push an Amagi to brawl with a Bismarck for instance.
-
Just like the Swedish tanks played no role in WWII and WG added the Swedish branch to WoT not long ago? You could have read the first paragraph off post 16 so I wouldn't have to repeat myself but hey
-
1. Winning or losing has no effect on credit income. 2. Yes, give more incentive to farm damage and get cheap kills on damaged enemies when the game is already lost because BBabies camped on the blue line while their team was dying fighting over the cap zone's.
-
I sold Mogami after those changes... it was my n1 all time favorite ship, still is if they give it the same treatment as they did with Kutuzov.. which I bought right after they nerved Mogami There are few people I would rather have on my team, I kind of like winning games
-
^^ this. There is just no other way. Or well I can post my 600k dmg results as well and then not tell they were training room battles with inactive bots
-
Since when is it 'overextending' when you can use your smoke? Overextending in a DD is being caught without smoke, or by a radar cruiser which negates your smoke.
-
Ow and Swedish tanks were influential in WWII?
-
Ftfy.
-
So that is why you perform so sub par with your German CA's? Because they can't spam HE? Ow wait they can. Well they can for me that is. Really, don't throw stones in glass houses, calling people clowns without actually having anything to substantiate it. German cruisers are AP centric right ( well... ) so why don't you do well with them, they should require true 'aiming skills' right?
-
A couple of thoughts regarding World of Warships.
mtm78 replied to Admiral_Viking's topic in General Discussion
And we thank WG for that since it's a game and should be fun for all classes. Or do you want an historically accurate simulator? Then I would play nothing but CV's and send all those BB's to the bottom of the ocean through air strikes without them even getting close to spotting my carrier. -
I don't want ONE, I think we could be a minor nation with several ships. I just don't think we're high priority. Look at WoT, Swedish tanks been added recently and how 'old' is WoT by now. But, while knowing it probably won't happen really soon, I would appreciate if WG gave the Dutch some recognition in the form of a premium ship as soon™ as possible. And yeah, I would like it to be a DD, as I think Isaac Sweers would be a fun ship to play. Dutch cruisers would probably play a lot like VMF one's, with accurate long range gun's ( and probably better AAA? ), while Isaac Sweers could be more like Blys depending on which gun configuration it would be implemented with ( and also good AAA, the stabilized bofors were pretty cutting edge ).
-
Exactly! So the Myogi can learn to be part of an engagement in support of his own tier 7 BB and not be the main target of the enemy Scharnhorst. Teamplay remember...
-
Is powercreep to be expected in a 'free to play' game?
mtm78 replied to loppantorkel's topic in General Discussion
British CL line is in the top 3 for tier VII and up, and is only the least performing at tier 5
