Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

mtm78

Alpha Tester
  • Content Сount

    19,378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    6105

Everything posted by mtm78

  1. mtm78

    DD spawn positions

    Agreed. I had BBabies complain I went to the other flank because both our DD's spawned there and no one was coming to our side.... like I would take my Donskoi and go spot for them edit: before BBabies get their knickers in a twitch or something, I got no issues hanging around the BB's and helping them with my radar against DD's but these BBabies actually pinged the map 10-15km in front of them and said I should go spot there Well... how about nope.gif followed by a kkthxbai.gif.
  2. mtm78

    Potential Cheat for Ranked

    Read topic like these and fear for the future of humanity. After realizing you can't fix humanity, have a laugh and just continue with what you were doing before
  3. mtm78

    Potential Cheat for Ranked

    LOL at calling official WG employee post crap
  4. mtm78

    Do battleships need a little help?

    Sure. Unless a BBaby makes another whine topic, then all bets are off
  5. mtm78

    World of Warships Sound Poll

    Those tentacles were nice.. wrong genre but nice anyway
  6. mtm78

    Do battleships need a little help?

    Don't forget to ask the data showing Belfast is 'balanced' as well
  7. mtm78

    Potential Cheat for Ranked

    Omg another one of those whine topics ffs.... Counting in is not cheating. And there is a 20 or so second randomizer for ranked matches so even if you press battle at the exact same time it's no where near as often you might end up in the same match as with randoms. tldr: stop crying
  8. mtm78

    Do battleships need a little help?

    idk either, there been community proposals made but all of them have flaws. I personally think it would help a lot of we had some tactical tutorials in the game for all classes. And perhaps even a system where 'good team play' would be actually rewarding. Take the current karma system and make it so people who get complimented on their plays actually gain something ( reports should not remove anything to prevent abuse ), remove the 7 daily report / compliment limit so people can always vote for someone to be rewarded for teamplay. And SHOW in the end screen if/how many compliments someone has gotten. I believe if people see their actions are being rewarded they will strive to do them more often. Not that this system is not without flaws but hey it's currently the only one I can think off which is semi viable.
  9. mtm78

    Hr. Ms. Tromp

    WG makes both games, if they can add Swedish tanks in one game they can add Dutch navy in WoWs ( even while it would be low priority with the Italians still missing, the British only having a CL line and the French only having a single premium ). Btw, according to you, Poland wouldn't 'need' a ship as well. I welcome you to go tell that to people in the Polish section on the forum Satisfying a community request is also part of game development, which is what this thread is about.
  10. mtm78

    Do battleships need a little help?

    2 contradicts 1 That is the main problem with BB's. I seen to many 45% BB's which still end somewhere in the top of their team because they live the longest and thus are able to get some kills on low hp ships and rack up some damage over time. Heck I even seen BB's which in the end game did an absolutely stellar job with shooting at enemies. But their win rate sucked non the less. Because, BB's are very important for winning games, their positioning is a deterrent to enemy cruisers, and not keeping the enemy cruisers from slaughtering your DD's is quite detrimental in relation to winning games. And most of the bad BB players are incapable of understanding it is THEM, that they are responsible for their bad win rate. Because, they aren't constantly ending up on the bottom of the team. They seem to conclude from that, that they are doing it right, and that they just keep getting bad / worse teams.
  11. mtm78

    Is Flamu Right About The Mogami?

    You play to win, anything which therefore wins games is 'playing for the team'. And he seemingly isn't bad at it either
  12. mtm78

    Is Flamu Right About The Mogami?

    In that tier X game in the review he got first blood by sneaking up on the enemy DD, idk but I wouldn't call that camping in the back
  13. mtm78

    An open letter to Wargaming

    That is also hard, some ships are designed to brawl and some are more suited for medium engagements. I wouldn't push an Amagi to brawl with a Bismarck for instance.
  14. mtm78

    Hr. Ms. Tromp

    Just like the Swedish tanks played no role in WWII and WG added the Swedish branch to WoT not long ago? You could have read the first paragraph off post 16 so I wouldn't have to repeat myself but hey
  15. mtm78

    An open letter to Wargaming

    1. Winning or losing has no effect on credit income. 2. Yes, give more incentive to farm damage and get cheap kills on damaged enemies when the game is already lost because BBabies camped on the blue line while their team was dying fighting over the cap zone's.
  16. mtm78

    Is Flamu Right About The Mogami?

    I sold Mogami after those changes... it was my n1 all time favorite ship, still is if they give it the same treatment as they did with Kutuzov.. which I bought right after they nerved Mogami There are few people I would rather have on my team, I kind of like winning games
  17. mtm78

    410k Damage with a Leander?

    ^^ this. There is just no other way. Or well I can post my 600k dmg results as well and then not tell they were training room battles with inactive bots
  18. mtm78

    Do battleships need a little help?

    Since when is it 'overextending' when you can use your smoke? Overextending in a DD is being caught without smoke, or by a radar cruiser which negates your smoke.
  19. mtm78

    Hr. Ms. Tromp

    Ow and Swedish tanks were influential in WWII?
  20. mtm78

    Do battleships need a little help?

    So that is why you perform so sub par with your German CA's? Because they can't spam HE? Ow wait they can. Well they can for me that is. Really, don't throw stones in glass houses, calling people clowns without actually having anything to substantiate it. German cruisers are AP centric right ( well... ) so why don't you do well with them, they should require true 'aiming skills' right?
  21. And we thank WG for that since it's a game and should be fun for all classes. Or do you want an historically accurate simulator? Then I would play nothing but CV's and send all those BB's to the bottom of the ocean through air strikes without them even getting close to spotting my carrier.
  22. mtm78

    Hr. Ms. Tromp

    I don't want ONE, I think we could be a minor nation with several ships. I just don't think we're high priority. Look at WoT, Swedish tanks been added recently and how 'old' is WoT by now. But, while knowing it probably won't happen really soon, I would appreciate if WG gave the Dutch some recognition in the form of a premium ship as soon™ as possible. And yeah, I would like it to be a DD, as I think Isaac Sweers would be a fun ship to play. Dutch cruisers would probably play a lot like VMF one's, with accurate long range gun's ( and probably better AAA? ), while Isaac Sweers could be more like Blys depending on which gun configuration it would be implemented with ( and also good AAA, the stabilized bofors were pretty cutting edge ).
  23. mtm78

    Matchmaking Chart

    Exactly! So the Myogi can learn to be part of an engagement in support of his own tier 7 BB and not be the main target of the enemy Scharnhorst. Teamplay remember...
  24. British CL line is in the top 3 for tier VII and up, and is only the least performing at tier 5
×