mtm78

Also given the same armor as CA's at the tier ofc, since it handles like a sluggish CA the only benefit it had was the concealment....... I think WG is wrong, very very very wrong, with catering to the BBabies constantly.

11AM PST = 8PM CET

It's still more fun if we can watch from the perspective of both teams, even if it's 'not serious'

I don't have to. Go buy an Imperator in the store,,, edit: damnit, nvm don't reply I'm just here for the

This should be streamed just like the tournament battles to be really funny, without multi twitch we will always be missing something Why aren't you multi casting the event WG?

My Imperator doesn't agree with this statement. I myself don't agree with a lot of content in this thread but you got enough antagonists active already so I will continue with o/

I was going to watch but then I saw your profile and realized you lied about being a true potato

I also find this funny -> .. so why didn't he say sorry when you did actually point out what he missed

1. you get pink from doing team damage / team kills 2. 3rd party sites -> https://eu.warships.today/player/522015801/Jimbomaxi 3. There are issues sometimes with certain payment providers, try using another ( paypal? ) 4. Low tier RN CL's are 'challenging', line improves with Leander and mostly Fiji. Bayern is not bad, guns lack pen at range due to shell drag. Gneisenau has only six gun's but does well at medium to close ranges ( it has torpedoes ). Bismarck is the best brawler BB ( with secondary build ) and FdG and the tier X are also blessed with great secondaries.

No links to WG stating you will get banned

It was posted in this very thread and many others like this one where people 'claimed' it was a 'cheat'. Not my fault you post in a thread without reading it first now is it ps I'm a pleb not a super unicum edit: let's turn this around ... Links to where they stated this? Ow wait....

It was a struggle, from tomato to potato

CBT I was a tomato. I had to ASK my team what was best for me to do. Slowly I learned, till there was a time where I asked what to do, got told something and actually thought: you know what, that's not bad but I know something even better. @OP Maybe you're not getting the support you ask for because you're not proposing / executing the most optimal strategies. Start with being humble and ask players who do better then you, you might improve.

You have some serious problems with either reading or comprehension.

Yeah WG EU should have mirrored it sadly we're more likely to get a mission to land devastating strikes on cruisers

MM only takes into account ship type and tier, no player data is considered. Sorry man, put the alu hat away.

The fact that it CAN happen isn't the same as it happening always. Having DD's all going for one flank greatly increases the odds of it happening though.

And guess who's job it is to get this initial scouting info ( in absence of a CV in game )? No one with a brain would choose to head on engage a superior force unneeded. Which brings it back to initial scouting.

Tbf Scharnhorst can beat most tier X cruisers as well. And the Karlsruhe in another game get's to bully Tenryu and friends ( tier I and II are always protected so V can see III as lowest tier even in +-3 ). Mostly though, the Karlsruhe also has a tier 7 BB on his team, he should never be the most attractive target for the enemy one.

Normally I fully read your reviews... But in this case: tldr: it's BROKEN. DD with radar should never be added to the game period.

Now DD's.... Do I need to repeat myself as well with pointing out the actual origin of BB's damage? Hint: it isn't HE, it isn't fires and it isn't torpedoes. Now you' re just trolling. Limiting DD's but wanting to limit BB's is just.... You do realize that IFHE is actually a nerf to BB's? You know, reduced fire chance for higher pen ( and thus higher damage salvo's ). And unlike HE or fire damage, AP pen's can't be fully healed. ------------------------------ You're looking to fix a problem which isn't there. HE is not an issue. Fires are not an issue. Static gameplay is because of to many BB's. Static gameplay is because of bad players. Static gameplay is because of good players being caught in a bad meta. And your changes won't fix this. This isn't real life. And in real life, carriers would do a lot more then contest the skies above. In real life BB's became extinct due to carriers for a reason. ------- Sorry for two posts, can't add more quote's to a single post

Clan tag is very applicable to some of the content in that post... I thought so to, but he plays all classes. Not even 700 games in though Nope.gif IJN already has more then high enough concealment range. Yeah, more RNG automated to replace player skill Give every BB Bismarck secondary damage, that will be balanced© right You do actually realize that the most damage BB's take in a battle is from AP shells? You know, those things other BB's tend to shoot at them? And DD's are supposed to be BB counters, stop trying to limit their effectiveness ( will continue on this later ). BB's take most damage from AP shells ( geez did I have to repeat myself here again... guess it will be a recurring theme sorry ). To the whole AP blahblah.... You mean you want cruisers to ' manouver ' and shoot AP at modules or something, or to ' get the BB's broadside '? How about not making BB's even more powerful then they are already thank you.

I wish we had this emote ->

Exactly that is what I meant in that bad DD's are more easilly forgotten because even good DD's might die 'randomly'. DD's which ignore objectives are terrible, no argument there. But I see less of them then sniping BB's. And CA's which don't do their task same thing. All classes need each other. BB's should be feared by enemy cruisers, forcing them at some distance so your DD's can play the objectives, and CA's need to support both the DD's and BB's where needed. CV's need to do their damage and their initial scouting. If you take one of them out, the rest suffers. BB's are just easilly blamed I guess for the reasons mentioned above. I don't think BB's are OP or UP, well some are really strong on their tier but as a class I don't have any issues with BB's ( or any of the other classes, though with CV's well I don't play them so I shouldn't talk about them I guess just seems there are balance issues between IJN and USN and I think CV's should perhaps have more limited MM range as a tier 8 CV can't drop tier X CA's / BB's much before being out of planes and a tier X CV up against tier VIII BB's / CA's is playing easy mode ).

Undeniably true, I am a terrible Shima player. Guess my main problem is and will likely always be my positioning. Which in Shima, seems to be key point. With most other ships I can still have decent influence even if I am in the 'second best' or worse position, while with Shima it feels like it's either 'the right spot' or 'useless'. But, coming back to BB's for a moment; there is a reason people complain about BBabies ( and rightfully so ). You don't actually see that many 'buff CA / DD / CV' threads in reality, but it seems almost daily we get one about how BB's are not 'working as they should' by someone who usually has hidden their stats. Adding to that, in game, if you have a bad DD, he probably dies early and people forget about it. If you have a bad BB he snipes from max range, survives the rest of his team and sometimes even goes 'wow another noob team' in chat because they died due to their BB being a blue line sniper. This creates salt, in excessive amounts even, as the blue line sniping BBaby then goes on claiming he wasn't the worst in the team so his low win rate is due to 'noobs' on his team constantly who die while he is still alive. In short: there are bad players in all classes, but a bad player in a BB brings more attention to himself. Same with CV's btw now that I think about it, with how influential they can be, having a bad CV vs a decent one makes people remember bad CV players more ( as those also tend to live long, and people have ample time after dying to watch and ponder on things like: wow if we had a better ( insert class name ) player we would have had a much higher chance of winning this game ). Bad DD's and bad cruisers are more easilly forgotten.