Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

mtm78

Alpha Tester
  • Content Сount

    19,378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    6105

Everything posted by mtm78

  1. mtm78

    Blind ship drivers

    Lol at ranked attracting more 'skilled' players... get over it man jezus.
  2. ..and to stop people from posting ' CV are OP ' / 'BUFF BB secondaries!' / 'NERF HE AND FIRE DAMAGE' threads the whole time.
  3. Impressive hit ratio
  4. mtm78

    MM engine fix

    Because RANK doesn't equate to SKILL in any way, certainly not before you reach rank 5 or higher.
  5. mtm78

    MM engine fix

    It is only broken if you don't accept that there will be games you lose no matter what you do. This is due to random MM, and it works as much against you as it does for you.
  6. mtm78

    MM engine fix

    True. Most players don't really division with ships which boost each other they division with ships they are 'grinding' or which they find fun to play. Not everyone plays to win as hard as others ( which is fail I agree, trying to win is the least you can do right ) Play the ships more in which you perform better? Most people have these ships, Bismarck is one of if not the best tier 8 BB, it might be your go-to ship. Or, try to find some people to division with, having 2 people with you on voice coms does wonders for synergy in game ( which reflects in win rate increase, especially if you as Ghostbuster_ eluded to pick ships which compliment each other ).
  7. mtm78

    MM engine fix

    So why are complaining again about being on the losing team to often
  8. mtm78

    MM engine fix

    Indeed it was your Bismarck, the hit ratio was correct though which is what counts right since you trained so much on aiming? edit: And app? You do realize you have public profile right -> https://worldofwarships.eu/en/community/accounts/537464392-aviaxis/!/pvp/ships/?bestShip=lexington
  9. mtm78

    MM engine fix

    Meh WG allows +-1 tier difference, and Neptune get's tier X anyway all the time ( it has the same MM range, only with two tier X's you would have a small chance of getting into a tier X only match ) Skill based MM won't happen, look at for how long people been asking for it ( some people, not all ) in WoT?
  10. mtm78

    MM engine fix

    Why do you think premium, 19 point captains, wasted time and money actually ENTITLE you to winning? Winning is skill based. You 'training on shooting' should give results. Except you did not train on it. 20% hr in Colorado, 25% on Tirpitz and 24% on Iowa for example. Guess you need more training. We have the same MM as you yet we are not as often in the losing team, what could be the difference now really? You think WG has a 'speciul' app like this one for WoT -> [edited] hint: they don't, the above image is a 'hoax'. edit2: looking at some of your ships in detail, I think your issue is in positioning. Your survival ratio in especially your cruisers is really bad. This to me seems to indicate a lack of situational awareness?
  11. mtm78

    weaknesses in the game.

    1. lolwut another buff to the class which according to WG themselves is already way to easy/popular to play? 2. see 1. 3. Meh, WG has already stated they are working on graphical improvements. 4. See 3. 5. See 3, in addition WG has stated we have cyclones which affect visibility. 5. see 1. Happy?
  12. mtm78

    MM engine fix

    You know what all those teams have in common? It's a three letter word made up from an Y an O and an U
  13. @stanton "If you're purple in DDs and nothing else. You ain't purple." I find your signature amusing. You do realize WTR per ship class is normalized to their average performance right? Or did you just mean purple win rate?
  14. I don't see me clocking in many games in her, she is just to slow to be fun ( to dependent on the rest of the team, can't react to changing situations fast enough ).
  15. mtm78

    Kings of the Sea...only four teams?

    During team battles, there were many of these 'loosely found groups' competing. Yet no one really came close to a certain clan which a> has members picked from the best of the best b> actually trained in team compositions. I agree you could find players who are not organized and who perform at comparable levels in randoms but the added discipline from training is not a trivial matter imo. Now if you found a group of skilled players and signed up for the next tournament, and trained with them beforehand, that's something else as just jumping in with total strangers. And at that time.. ^^ A bunch of ronins would have a tough time getting into the final rounds. edit: Ianal but afaik it shouldn't be a problem if you signed up a group of players from different clans or no clan affiliations as long as those clans are not already competing? You should ask an administrator that question, it's not a bad one as you might be right that there are people maybe in clans which are not competing while they do want to, if the organizers would allow a bunch of people from different affiliations to sign up and compete it might increase interest. That being said, I'm pretty sure there is already more interest than there are spots free in the roster atm
  16. mtm78

    weaknesses in the game.

    1 -2 - 6 makes me think you're a BB main... amiriteoramirite?
  17. mtm78

    Kings of the Sea...only four teams?

    Shhhh... that's the reason clans are officially only 30 people big right ---- Looking forward to the tournament, hope doing something constructive helps take my mind or rl stuff
  18. mtm78

    Fires needs a heavy nerf

    I would hire you in a heartbeat. edit: I just remember, iirc I am not allowed to post images of the Iraqi information minister, think I got a warning for that once before...
  19. mtm78

    Imperator Nickolai - time for some changes

    New Yorck is squishy as hell, it's no challenge. Kongo at least hits back hard but it's equally punishable if it doesn't angle properly ( well NY is even punishable a lot when it angles correctly that's how squishy she is ).
  20. mtm78

    Ranked battles and AFK players

    <off topic>I been told you get to keep Alabama ST even when you quit ST.. but that might be an ex colleague trolling the hell out of me </offtopic> So which is it, a 'less casual' or an actually 'competitive' game mode? Heck I would even ban people from randoms if they load in late in most of their games.... There is a reason we have min requirements for running the game, and joining team and objective based multiplayer games knowing you will be a detrimental factor to your team seems ... weird. Yes, that also includes people with 40% win rate, I also don't understand why they play when they should realize their terrible at it, but hey at least they got Dunning Kruger as excuse! Someone who is actually decent when finally logged in has no excuse to not recognize his constant deprivation at game start has a large negative effect on everyone also 'lucky' enough to be on his team. The biggest issue I have are late loading DD's, they are the worst of all ( and CV's... most other classes are less in need of not being late, a BB which is a minute late might not be in optimal position at the same time as the others but due to excessive ranges on them he will still be able to have a decent impact... and cruisers are usually not decisive in early game but become more decisive when the game drags on ). DD's on the other hand, even in standard, are supposed to give timely information about enemy fleet movement, if they don't the whole team suffers instantly. Now imagine that in a competitive game mode. Meh randoms are ok, it's not like an loss due to someone loading late would be more frustrating than some of the general levels of play of those who actually load in time.
  21. mtm78

    Fires needs a heavy nerf

    Did you ever consider running for president?
  22. mtm78

    Imperator Nickolai - time for some changes

    You farm to much damage, that win rate is appalling Not really. Sure speed is, but not protection. 3x3 forward facing gun turrets, with no superstructure, with really good sigma, that's the protection. Sure, German BB can withstand the same pummeling if not more when broadside... but Imperator does never have to show that broadside due to turret arrangement. And it lacks the superstructure the other ships have, so it takes far less damage from HE spamming cruisers. The only downside to it's protection is it's weak torpedo bulge, but again the sigma makes dealing with DD's somewhat less impossible then it would with a similar tier IV BB with the same turret placement even ( not that there is any yet.. ( and I hear most probable suspect for regular tier IV VMF BB having 2x3 + 2x3 in a more conventional setup ).
  23. Would make certain ships even stronger then they already are ( *cough Imperator Nicolai *cough* Koning Albert cough* ) I don't think removing manual drops on low tiers is any way to balance things at all, CV players need to learn that skill BEFORE they meet New Mexico's not during.
  24. I had time to spare
  25. mtm78

    Imperator Nickolai - time for some changes

    Ditto, sorry if it got a bit heated it just felt like you were downplaying the ships performance and like you were saying that the old MM would make her perform in an intolerable fashion. In the end, it's up to WG to make a decision.
×