mtm78

Blys, ok you're right. Zao as well. But Akizuki? Lol, the ONLY upside of that thing is invisifire. And it's not about the ships which as WG has said a long time ago would be receiving buffs where needed, it's about the stupidity to cater to crying BBabies when WG on the other hand also says they find it problematic that there is a 40% BBaby population

WG, you did us a solid. Only thing I would have liked even more would be moving the captain to the higher tiered ship IF it had more captain XP then the 9p captain we will get now. Because I will still need to put the highest point captain on the highest tiered ship which will cost me either elite commander xp or doubloons. But other then that ->

Best example of a ship which would need several serious buffs. WG is catering to crying BBabies so much... and they wonder why there is a 40% BB population....

Ever looked in the mirror while saying that? You should practise. The ship was SOLD with tier 4-6 MM, unlike ANY OTHER tier IV battleship ( and for a darn good reason ). The artificial limit to max tier 5 is in fact therefore CUSTOM matchmaking

Because they spend time learning game mechanics and optimize their ability to aid their teams in winning more and saw the resulting increase in win rate, thus proving that as they gain knowledge about these things their performance increases alongside that increase in knowledge? edit: this game is not so much twitch reflex based, it's more tactical then most 'shooters' and while it's very arcade in game mechanics that doesn't mean tactical approach to games isn't more important then how high dpi your mouse is and how quick your reflexes are. I'm not even 'bad' at twitch shooters, but the tactical aspect of this game is what is the most interesting to me anyway. And I'm not even really good at it, I learn something every darn day, hopefully two things as most days I tend to forget to apply something I actually already knew as well

Lmao about the words 'confirmed' and a link to THAT site Much there man gg wp.

And here I was thinking I only had the English language sections selected for my 'view new content' page....

Actually it answers both.

Everything is 'broken' if they are your main opponent. Try playing some more games in a DD before claiming they are broken because they have.... something surely unneeded such the ability to reload their tubes during the battle Some of your other points are also plain wrong. No ship in smoke sees out, they can shoot at ships which are spotted by their team though.

I know this, I also watched video's from the US nuclear testing at Bikini atoll It was in response to the article mentioning "several ten's of km's". Time is compressed heavily in the game though

Yup... or post biased nonsense in this thread after playing 8 of their 2k games in a DD

Well my Trashcan has 70% wr so far ( in 10 games )... Udaloi was really meh though... Does Gremmy count?

[edited] Do not go editing a quoted post to make it mean something different - RogDodgeUK

We already had more chances to get Katori then US had, so please get mad about something sensible.... like we not having the same signal packs or something... but NOT about the Katori because that's just

One important note here - if your team is adamant on ignoring objectives you already lost because of them so OFF COURSE you then play to salvage what you can by farming as much damage as possible. That does not excuse doing so when others in your team are actually trying to win the game like Genai is advocating, because he ( or the 'he' in his 'example' ) would rather do damage then go for a victory, edit: and I will smoke allies when I'm solo playing, especially in the RU DD's I'm playing now since well I don't use the smokes for myself ( exceptions possible ) anyway

Guilty as charged, except for the getting mad if losing Hahahahaha. An excuse for the ffi border humpers? 'But but I live longer and do more dmg, feck tanking for the team I play for my own performance'? Perfect example of what's wrong with some players. So because WG can't track what damage you negate through smoking an ally you think it's not about winning? Funny. Also, the DD IS rewarded, he has a higher chance of winning which is the goal of the game Exactly! So people playing for personal performance are selfish bastards which ruin the gameplay by deviating from the actual intent -> winning games. Then he is a selfish bastard and if I meet him again I will gladly withhold any support ( and hope he dies really quick ). Lmao you're not even that funny but you're certainly trying to act like one. Inflammatory comment of the month right there. Why would it prove he is ' better ' when he's a selfish ,,,,,, which doesn't play for the team goal of winning the game. Only in your head.

On a more serious note, I've learned that some game studios have been using surplus inventory to strengthen their balance departments

Also, those people don't always actually give the most reliable answers about unreleased content anyway ;)

Guys let's give him a chance. Maybe he can surprise us and can come up with a reasonable explanation on why win rate ( solo / division / ship based ) isn't tied to skill over a larger number off games. I know, I know, many have tried and failed but he might actually pull it off.. Ow and more 'bad ships' in which i do reasonable ok in -> Fubuki 69& wr vs 50% server average, Tashkent 69% wr vs 50% server average... in fact I actually do BETTER with generally 'worse' ships Some of the known 'OP' ships I do actually only a little better in compared with server averages. WG did, don't you read the hints before the battle starts?

If you win ONE game, sure it's not about you. But if you win 60%+ out of a 1000 games, and someone else wins 40%- out of a 1000 games, that is what does indicate skill since with large amount off games both players will have had comparable amounts of games where their personal influence was decisive. There are other factors, division or not ( and with who ), but these can be checked. Also, there is enough deviation possible that someone with 48% might be equal or even better then someone with a 52% win rate. But when it's 10% or more, there is more to it then 'lucky teams'. Incidentally, it's always the people from the lower brackets which dismiss this idea... I wonder why edit: sure they do, they get the victory just like me. Infact I might be that guy ^^ You mean my Yorck with 65% wr ( server average 50% )? Or my Pensacola with 'just' 56% wr ( server average 48% )? I seem to do ok in them

Waiting for prices of 1600X ... might get that and move my sandy bridge to my sons pc.

Don't think it's going to do anything, most collisions occur because bad players don't have enough situational awareness and block better players from proper angling. Horns will just confuse the baddies even more.

http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/forum-480/announcement-3-world-of-warships-forum-rules/ Watch it man

Since the goal of the game is to win, yeah people who win more are better at it. Seems pretty straight forward no