mtm78

That is why I said: in most situations ;)

You're so funny You go play multiplayer team based games for your own advancement man, see how many team members will be happy with you.

I feel like a douche when I take out a BB, I rather stealthfire on those who do so I shall cleanse them off their sins with my HE rain

Easy to say for someone who only plays USN DD's where shell arcs make stealth firing not really viable in most situations anyway

But no preliminary buffs will be done, because WG never designed/balanced ships with stealth firing in mind WG's balancing department.... come play Akizuki with me when it is always spotted, show me how I should play it effectively when it has no armor and turns worse then a cruiser

Removal of stealth firing will also make the game really crap for Akizuki for instance.....

Bit short but hey considering you need to highlight quality plays....

Bull the mechanic is perfectly transparent ( pun intended ) and the only people being 'put off' by it are BBabies which don't CARE about other classes, or players who want a straight up shooter without tactical depth added by mechanics such as stealth firing. Both of these types of players should imo NEVER be catered to, period.

Nah, Takao / Atago and all other nations ships for the most part have 'forward' facing torpedoes, Zao has 'bad' enough arcs to making using torpedoes when rushing something the same as saying: hey, I'm uh going to uh show you where my privates are, please don't kick me in the nuts. uh cuz that uh would like uh hurt me a lot uh ok.

I will keep my Blys and Gremmy as they are good compared with other same tier DD's even with global removal of invisi fire. I will keep thinking the balancing department is clearly being run by the same 'players' as those mentioned in the Cambodia thread..... so that will most likely mean I would encourage everyone to not ever spend another dime at this game.

Which coincidentally, he never actually links to, if he mentions it at all that is. Also, to the guy claiming Zao got forward facing torpodo's.... Atago / Takao have FORWARD facing torpedo's, NOT Zao. Thank you. You go charge a BB and try to torp it without exposing your citadel. Ow wait...

I also don't find the shell arcs that great tbh... Though it does have quite troll armor as long as you can get them to shoot at your angled broadside you can bounce a LOT of things ( except Yamato ofc ). That being said, I am actually finding playing Hindenburg more fun then playing Zao Also looking forward to battleship Moskva a lot

Tbf this was said beforehand ( that you need to be quick with signing up ). However.. maybe you could ask the admin's if it would be possible for team's which apply and are denied to lack of available space, be given priority for admissions for the next tournament. The question can always be asked, I don't know if they will do it but you could try something which could lead to something constructive

And the big armored and equipped with heal ability BB's are the most efficient cruiser deleting ships in the game All classes have things they are 'best' in, or else what would be the point.

Setting + value to 0 still makes you top tier every time ( which is not really fair and would not work since many people will elect to never be uptiered ). So how about it allows settings +2 FIXED like it is now, outside of protected MM ranges, and allowing an additional 1 higher 'challenge' tier so you can set it to +3.

Indeed. It's normal human behavior to emotionally bond with something in your direct environment. Seems to part of normal human psyche. Glad i'm not normal though

Not according to WG's history of saying: BB's are problematic all at the same time they nerf everything which is intended to counter them \ What 'problem'? It makes BBabies cry?

Ow then how about hell no? -1 or -2 should be fixed lmao wanting to prevent downtiering because you always want to be be top dog? Hahahahahahaah Now, willingly give yourself a tougher challenge by getting a higher battle tier that's something else.

It would make statistics worthless without adding 'average battle tier spread' to tracked statistics, but other then that it would be fine with me really, as rewards in XP / credits already scale with the ships you engage. edit: with the added explanation below all I can say is: hell no lmao.... Also you're contradicting yourself -> Btw I don't think anyone would ever want to play +4 MM with current ship balance, especially since the chances of being a likewise ship on the enemy team would be very low

He actually made me discover something though, the difference in my 'weak' ship performance is imo mostly caused by being less center of focus. Being in a Yorck instead of a Myoko, people tend to focus the 'stronger ships' when they have equal opportunity. And if this 'weaker' ship is also constantly presenting the most minimal profile, they tend to just shoot the easier and 'more threatening' targets. I think I should buy back some of those ships

They did say that I know, they said it even some time ago already. But they also indeed said they would monitor impact and adjust ships which suffer after the change as needed. This can be dismissed as being not worth anything due to not having trust in either intent or ability of the balance department ( /me is guilty as charged ) or can be taken at face value indicating someone actually trusts things the PR machine spits out ( just like no ships ever being designed with stealth fire ability as balancing factors ).

http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/75344-trails-of-wows-accounts-selling-leads-to-kambodia/page__pid__1678950#entry1678950 edit: OP should replace his 'source' link with a link to the actual ffin Q&A instead of advertising for 'that' site

That relates Akizuki to long range support only, as it doesn't fix the problems it has when fighting at medium or shorter ranges while constantly spotted ( atrocious turning/dodging ability ).

I'm slowly starting to think this thread is here to promote a YT channel