mtm78
-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Everything posted by mtm78
-
But RN doesn't have defensive fire, anything you don't shoot down will drop accurate ordnance that is why US and then GE ca's are 'better' AAA platforms.
-
Leander 52.77% wr 33k dmg Budyonny 51.70% wr 34k dmg Fiji 53.27% wr 43k dmg Shchors 50.68% wr 49k dmg Edinburgh 51.56% wr 42k dmg Chapayev 45k dmg Neptune 52.03% wr 56k dmg Donskoi 51.52% wr 53k dmg Minotaur 51.39% wr 73k dmg Moskva 51.33% wr 79k dmg https://eu.warships.today/vehicles -> 2 week timespan, all pvp, min 1000 battles Yeah... there is something so wrong with RN CL's, they just can't stop winning more games then those UP HE spamming VMF cruisers I was with you all the way, right up to that point. Flint -> bad for the game. Belfast -> bad for the game. Heck even Leningrad is bad for the game if you make Minsk a worse version in the tech tree aka pay for advantage ( just like Belfast ). But there is nothing wrong with RN CL's except for the low tiers where they are terrible ( performing amongst the worst of all lines... amongst, not way below others just... on the low side ).
-
Anything which lowers amount of BB(abies) is a good thing, more DD's being released and more cruisers/baguettes is
-
Did you read the review? This is a FUN ship, not competition for my Gremmy
-
I wonder why they lie about manual checks, are they really trying get people to believe there are people checking reports in real time at 3 in the morning ... And actually the response was, to one of my own threads: no you didn't do anything in that match to warrant a chat ban, but you had so many reports that the system is still working as intended because you had so many reports. Like: if you get 100 false speeding tickets, you should still lose your licence even if the tickets are not valid
-
Or WG could introduce the Dutch cruiser, low tier Dutch cruisers already mounted Hazemeyer stabilized L/60 Bofors
-
That happens only when you complain about getting a chat ban due to the broken system
-
Excellent review! I want this, just for the epic memes which will surely come with it Also it will probably be cheapish
-
US and German ( manual AAA on the high tier GE CA's is said to be awesome... ). Wonder why you ask though, not many carriers around recently..
-
Someone help me getting rid of the ARP voices, please
mtm78 replied to JapLance's topic in General Discussion
You called? -
the client works you just need to edit the xml, I could link to modpacks which do this automatically but I am not sure they work on Mac ( WG modpack does and it has the multi server mod, but the RU installer isn't translated yet so I'm not sure how you would feel about using it ). http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/21275-tip-how-to-change-server-and-play-wows-on-all-servers-eu-na-ru-asia-using-one-game-client/ edit: just to make sure, DO NOT download the file from that post, the xml file is outdated. But the method described is still valid ->
-
Pleb, I got my first chat ban today in weeks... so many excrement filled teams past two days it's horrible. Guess the new patch brought back a lot of the baddies wanting to try the new ships without actually knowing how to play the darn game
-
Constant CTDs after patch 0.6.1 (continuing with 0.6.2)
mtm78 replied to Aotearas's topic in Archive
Did you check your log files if they might contain some hints? -
Stealth firing removal: also for Premiums!
mtm78 replied to Sams_Baneblade's topic in General Discussion
So that's why good players use stealth builds on their BB's, so they can get within 13km of a cruiser without being spotted ( Montana.. yes tier X BB with 12 406mm gun's which are quite accurate at that range ) -
But that's the thing, DD's are SUPPOSED to counter BB's so yes they have to be dangerous or you might as well remove them. And to many DDs is not fun, not even for the DD's, but that's not any more true that to many BB's is not fun for cruisers ( except maybe Zao and which ever cruiser excels at long range he spam ). I'd rather see both, limits to classes as well as some encouragement for players to play their ships in their role. Also not sure what you can change on ships to encourage teamwork
-
Kind of a weird statement to make no, since undisclosed changes are actually likely to have happened, thing is they are probably insignificant and therefore not really noticed that much
-
Still? Even after all the nerfs, that's STILL the excuse BB's have to camp? It's having six or more BB's per side, making cruisers play static as playing aggressive would be stupid. WG themselves said having 3 bb's per team is the max in ideal circumstances. With 3 BB's cruisers can be played more aggressive and deal with those DD's the BB's are so scared off. BB's cause camping, not DD's and not CV's. Well sure, DD's CAN cause camping IF there are a shitton of torpedo boats. But a bunch of RU DD's causing camping? Never really seen it tbh. Bunch of IJN DD's AND having your own DD's not screening, sure THAT can cause camping. But that's not the DD's fault, it's the players fault in your friendly DD's.
-
Stealth firing removal: also for Premiums!
mtm78 replied to Sams_Baneblade's topic in General Discussion
Yes that would be as retarded as claiming open water SF is a game breaking issue.... but no, they won't remove smoke... if you can be spotted in smoke, wth would it's use then be? So no, it just affects concealment penalty after firing. -
These are just bad players, nothing to do with CV's. Staying with support doesn't mean you need to stay near your spawn, there is no correlation between those two things at all. That is very true.
-
CV's were to strong sure, no one is denying that ;) And yeah some people still grasp the concept of teamwork, but it's far from as common as it was during earlier times mostly because it's less of an absolute requirement ( because CV's were more powerful you really could not do without the support at all ). I btw survived quite a many matches even in CBT where we had those broken CV's, a lot of them 'being broken' ( even in bad players hands ) was that the one's they were dropping on were equally bad at evading. And yes, now having a CA with defensive fire does make a bigger difference. Which wasn't the point though. Point was that someone claimed CV's making people camp, and they don't. CV's kill stationary targets, the last thing they do is make the game 'campy' they punish those parking behind islands sitting stationary
-
You must have not read any of his previous posts then
-
Should work, it's available as stand alone in other modpack and it works there ( doesn't use modAPI btw ).
-
Be honest, the scrubs are always alive! It's just that the weekend has the same effect on them as a full moon on werewolfs
-
I am sorry but no. And that's not just me, but some of the top players on the server saying this
-
So it look like this -> Those are Mech's WoT is very arcade but they are still tanks.
