-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mtm78
-
What if the potato's are in the divisions?
-
Reduce the view distance in the middle of the smoke.
mtm78 replied to Lt_Raptor's topic in General Discussion
1. IRL arguments in a WG game? irl BB's had a +-3% hit ratio, don't think it would be good for the game though. 2. Depends, you can push on smoke campers if you have the right ships and support. In short, smoke has a counter but it's teamplay and thus not really happening a lot. Either way, too many BB's in a game makes the game also more static and campy and it's a bigger problem due to overpopulation of BB's, if something which causes static gameplay should be addressed that's the first thing. We already have radar and hydro to counter smoke, we got nothing to counter the overpopulation of BB's at the moment ( CV rework might do the trick, have to wait and see ). 3. Why? why are RN CL's imbalanced because they need smoke? Just because you feel smoke is broken? See, the only thing adding validity to this point is first accepting smoke is broken. Which it's not, not so much at least, not with radar and hydro being available. 4. The whole idea that BB's have armor, hitpoints and heal ability while DD's should rely on RNG / dispersion ( with the upcoming removal of stealth firing ability ) is just ... kind of douchy. And this is coming from a DD player who also plays cruisers and also plays BB's, so maybe something needs a rework but there are much more pressing issues with the game as it is now ( BB population ). Smoke counters are already in the game, and they are pretty effective. -
Proliferation of rare "Premium" ships available via campaigns or via huge amount of FreeXP ("Missouri", "Admiral Graf Spee" and "Shinonome")...
mtm78 replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
I played two games with her now after unlocking her today. Both were pretty crap. Both times I had enemy gunboats which had their team supporting them, both times my team didn't shoot them ONCE while spotted ( well last game they did, but that was when I had like 100hp left so right after saying: "yes finally I can do some wo.." I died. I am struggling with a good captain setup for her, my Akizuki captain is no good because it has no EM and it has IFHE and no torp reload, and idk what I done with my Shiratsuyu captain as that one would be the best fit I guess... maybe I didn't look well enough, likely it was on my Kamikaze.. so I played both games with a Yugumo captain with only 13p and a quite bad skill set.- 54 replies
-
- Proliferation
- Premium Ship
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
His circles depict his own concealment and his 'render range'. But yeah the wording is a bit off, though I do think he got the basic idea on this right as it took a lot of people in another topic to explain the differences I just don't think he got what YOU are telling him, that in order to profit from allied AAA you should be reasonably close to AAA cover even while spotting. The way he talks it seems like he expects allied CV to cover him with fighters. Ideally this sometimes happens, but a CV will most likely use his fighters to make sure his strikes are landing ( intercepting enemy fighters and float planes ). Which is why the theory of allied CV playing air defense is nice, I should know I have asked on forum for more AS setups so I don't get spotted / attacked myself so often, but as all the good cv players have told me AS is basically only viable in competitive play, in random battles strike setup gives a much higher win rate. edit: tl&dr -> he is right, in an ideal circumstance the allied DD CV ( nothing to see here, I didn't mix up any classes no really I did not ) would cover his DD's from fighters. In practise, this is more often not the most efficient use of his fighters ( someone who plays CV's on high level and think I'm wrong feel free to correct me if needed ).
-
Reduce the view distance in the middle of the smoke.
mtm78 replied to Lt_Raptor's topic in General Discussion
He actually also plays DD's, not as much as BB's and his BB's already perform better, so my question to him is still -> -
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Indeed, I propose we all sharpen our pitchforks and demand a 1km buff to Imperator's gun range immediately -
The worst the reports can do is give you an automated chat ban for 24h, account bans are never done through the report system ( unless you get reported for botting and WG does a manual review to check it ).
-
Proliferation of rare "Premium" ships available via campaigns or via huge amount of FreeXP ("Missouri", "Admiral Graf Spee" and "Shinonome")...
mtm78 replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
It's free, didn't have to anything but play. I could have had it so much sooner if I played for the mission goals but I just picked missions based on rewards and played as normal.- 54 replies
-
- Proliferation
- Premium Ship
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
You act surprised? -
WG will you do sometnig with [edited]that play over 500 games in ranked and are on rank 5-4-10-9
mtm78 replied to Fizzy_Odin's topic in General Discussion
Maybe you got lucky in the first 2 seasons you played -
WG will you do sometnig with [edited]that play over 500 games in ranked and are on rank 5-4-10-9
mtm78 replied to Fizzy_Odin's topic in General Discussion
Your argument was that he died more often, who cares if he dies when he is doing something useful? -
WG will you do sometnig with [edited]that play over 500 games in ranked and are on rank 5-4-10-9
mtm78 replied to Fizzy_Odin's topic in General Discussion
Did he also LOSE more in those 31 games? Since dying while securing a victory doesn't seem to be a 'bad' thing right? -
Rewards for participating in Public Test 0.6.2
mtm78 replied to MS_Surface's topic in General Discussion
6.2 email linked to NA page for some reason, the 6.0 and 6.1 were EU I just double checked it but it's the actual WG site not a scam, and when logged in you get the same bonus page but with the .com site extension -> https://worldofwarships.com/en/userbonus/- 37 replies
-
- prizes
- public test
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
You're right, my bad
-
Rewards for participating in Public Test 0.6.2
mtm78 replied to MS_Surface's topic in General Discussion
Yes that is the page I was linked to twice ( 6.2 and 6.0 iirc ) with 6.1 linking me to an NA landing page.- 37 replies
-
- prizes
- public test
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
What do you think about the stats of the new premium italian cruiser and of the tier 10 french cruiser?
mtm78 replied to HipHopHippopotamus's topic in Cruisers
Shouldn't it have been deleted due to duplicate thread already existing? The thread which links to the ACTUAL source btw instead of the ripoff blog. -
WG will you do sometnig with [edited]that play over 500 games in ranked and are on rank 5-4-10-9
mtm78 replied to Fizzy_Odin's topic in General Discussion
Why do you assume damage dealt reflects skill? It matter A LOT where you did that damage and to whom you did that damage. Everyone can farm damage if that's what they think is important -
Proliferation of rare "Premium" ships available via campaigns or via huge amount of FreeXP ("Missouri", "Admiral Graf Spee" and "Shinonome")...
mtm78 replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
I hear she is quite good actually, but you do need a good IJN DD captain on her.- 54 replies
-
- Proliferation
- Premium Ship
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Rewards for participating in Public Test 0.6.2
mtm78 replied to MS_Surface's topic in General Discussion
Afaik the 6.0 link didn't work for me because it linked to EU redeem site which I already used when I checked the other link for 6.2, the 6.1 link I had went to an NA site where I was also credited with stuff. I didn't participate in all stages off the PT iirc but I got a nice chunk of free stuff so ..- 37 replies
-
- prizes
- public test
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Rewards for participating in Public Test 0.6.2
mtm78 replied to MS_Surface's topic in General Discussion
3 mails in total, 6.0 6.1 and 6.2, last mail was sent yesterday at 19:10.- 37 replies
-
- prizes
- public test
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Reduce the view distance in the middle of the smoke.
mtm78 replied to Lt_Raptor's topic in General Discussion
And why would you want to change a mechanic which makes your DD's lose more games then your BB's, when those DD's already win less games for you? -
What do you think about the stats of the new premium italian cruiser and of the tier 10 french cruiser?
mtm78 replied to HipHopHippopotamus's topic in Cruisers
It's one of Sebastian's shills trying to promote his rip off site. Expect many more threads from him linking 'news' from that wordpress blog. -
Rewards for participating in Public Test 0.6.2
mtm78 replied to MS_Surface's topic in General Discussion
Not even sure, I had 2 mails, one lead to an NA page I had to log into and which accredit me with some signals and cammo and the other was to the normal EU redemption page. I played in most recent PT's though and I haven't checked rewards in some time, on the other hand usually those reward are only active pretty short after completion of the PT session- 37 replies
-
- prizes
- public test
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Rewards for participating in Public Test 0.6.2
mtm78 replied to MS_Surface's topic in General Discussion
Thanks for the thread, almost forgot to check my mailbox- 37 replies
-
- prizes
- public test
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Proliferation of rare "Premium" ships available via campaigns or via huge amount of FreeXP ("Missouri", "Admiral Graf Spee" and "Shinonome")...
mtm78 replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
6 more pins needed for Shinome, Graf Spee was a cakewalk, Missouri is not something I'm even close to as I always use my free xp to shorten / cut out stock grinds. And I got so many free xp signals and cammo's but I never use them as I got so many others which seem more useful.- 54 replies
-
- Proliferation
- Premium Ship
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
