mtm78

-------------- Being reminded of it on a frequent basis in this thread.

Nothing wrong in that screenshot.

That's what I did for a long time, though that ofc doesn't help if you want the gold to convert free xp or buy premium ships in game

It was the original topic, so it's only right to link to it But I still thank you since I hadn't noticed the other topic and I would've missed it if it wasn't because of you

There is ONE person I know who had his gold transfered, everyone else who asked through a ticket to support was denied. Guess that one guy was just very very lucky

.... That chart if from WG you......

Only if we use the premise that the MM Z_Onkel has gotten in those ~1.7k games is representative, he might be an outlier. I would like to see this data from WG though, I am sure they have some tools which track these statistics.

That just indicates that you team killed someone 3 games before. You keep the status for 5 games UNLESS you do any team damage ( even touching an ally slightly with your ship counts as team damage when in this state ).

ty, code worked ( didn't check in game what it gave but I trust you ).

Looks like a healthy dose of l2p is needed.

Type59 could easilly be sold now without breaking the game.... it's pretty comparable to 252y or even Patriot or Liberte and they sell those .... The only people still thinking it's somehow a magical I win button are those who don't have one and who think that because it is still no longer sold it's anywhere near her previous status.

Incoming shells... what client renders and what server actually calculates aren't 100% synced so even when someone extrapolates shell trajectory from the game's rendering engine it isn't reliable info. Torp tracks, once torpedoes are spotted they keep being spotted and it's easy to draw a line across their path. It's not allowed but I don't find it that game breaking. Moving aim points -> the internal one which used WG's own code was removed and python access was closed. As with any game, it's always possible to intercept dirextx draw calls and thus get the ship models and calculate an aim point based on it. So yeah, it's not impossible there are still cheats out there. But WG is actively banning people why they catch using them, there been large ban rounds on RU cluster, or well there was info made public by RU cluster about how many accounts had been banned and I would hope this policy is the same on all regions. It's just that EU never makes those numbers public. There are no cheats which can do what you describe. Visibility is handled server side, nothing is done client side. In smoke, they can not see you. What they CAN see if you shells exiting the barrels. It's not that hard to land shots in smoke. Even when you move in your smoke, especially now since more and more people actually shoot into smoke and have learned how to do that. Or even just shoot with the idea of hoping to hit... The EU and RU client is the same, if they can ban people on RU cluster based on having detected usage off illegal mods they should be able to do the same on every region. But WG never makes public banlists available, certainly not in EU.

I wish more BB Kevin's were like you.

T59 had protected MM when released. Also, WG nerved the frontal profile ( disguised as a 'suspension fix' ) so it was easier to pen the frontal weakspots. The old gun also had less pen but much better gun handling. And most importantly, there was no gold ammo for credits. Basically, if you enemy team had tier 8 heavy tanks with stock gun's, you could bully them like no tomorrow. Angled Type59 was the best armored tank at tier 8, it had / still has a really good turret to ( for the time... powercreep is a real thing in WoT even worse than in WoWs ). Also, Type59 was a Chinese clone of a T54, bit worse in most parts but it was closer to the T54 then the T44. edit: wait... did I somehow end up on the wrong WG forum today

Pictures say more then a thousand words ( in this case for instance ). ps.Just because you don't like images doesn't mean you have to lie about it, makes you look really sad kind of like the picture above. We will see when it hits live.

11.4km concealment iirc

The extra dispersion would increase their chance to hit

It requires more team play then we have now, and while I like teamplay, I don't think making DD's more dependent on the rest of their teams is the best way of creating this. The class which isn't know for their teamwork isn't DD's. edit: it's also strange, BB's can't be required to stay near cruisers for AAA, but DD's can be required to have proper support... makes me think... well my signature says enough

Well he is from the Q&A team so he should be better qualified

You're doing yourself a big honor by doing so, leave the actual communication to Sub_Octavian

More dispersion = more RNG. Can't really twist that into anything else.

Mid tier BB's, especially stock one's... They might lack range, but it's never been range which made them dangerous right. So them being less visible isn't affecting things is just a silly comment if you'd ask me. Konig has 15km gun range stock, how many cruisers at that tier will be happy when it's no longer spotted from much further when it fires it's guns? Directly? Nope not much. But let's see what happens on live. I will stop arguing now, i think it's clear what I been saying going on now will just draw things out to a point I am no longer comfortable with

But but that's what BB Kevin wants from the game, how can you argue about that?

So BB's not longer being spotted beyond their gun range is something which doesn't affect them? If affects EVERYTHING, every ship in the game which would fade into concealment in many cases ... well except BB's ofc... and which now have to keep their guns silent for 20 seconds to escape the focus fire. I think the change will lead to game's being static. I think the change will lead to way more games where one team has absolutely no chance of winning because they don't have people willing to play the objectives. I think they should make DD's and CA's have less bloom time then BB's, I think they shouldn't BUFF BB's again with decreasing their concealment penalty when firing. I think that adding RNG to shooting at targets which have a concealment module mounted isn't the right answer. I think you claiming that the concealment system isn't a core game mechanic is a bit silly, and I certainly think you know that even IF it would only directly affect less then a quarter of the ships the others ships would still be influenced indirectly. AFT removal just lowered the possible engagement range of CL's, making CA's comparably stronger ( well until IFHE came ). But I can think a lot of things, apparently everything is fine You keep making edits to posts after I read them, it's so.... refreshing... You do realize Sub_Octavian even said this in the Q&A with flamu which was... like... this week?

They just did it for me Ow and WG takes me a lot more serious then everyone here is taking you for btw, else Sub_Octavian would first respond on this forum to one of my posts for instance. I don't see you getting into ST either. Or well, I don't see you being taken serious about anything you say really.