Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

mtm78

Alpha Tester
  • Content Сount

    19,378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    6105

Everything posted by mtm78

  1. mtm78

    0.6.3 Public Test Patchnotes

    That would only be a viable statement if we thought WG made sensible development decisions.
  2. Thanks for the laugh, it was nice reading all those lies again
  3. Yes, choose your ship better, don't use DD's with good guns just because WG put them in the game! Which just means, WG made an entire line which is just 'wrong' -> http://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:destroyers /sarcasm
  4. People who argue that RPF is fine because whatever reason just show how bad they are at seeing the large picture. Take a good player like flamu, he HATES the skill and he abuses it as much as he can. Because it is so powerful. The only reason that plebs aren't getting the same results is ... well they are plebs. The skill IS game breaking, it's the plebs which cried for it because they didn't like concealed enemies which make it not game breaking because they lack the brain capacity to actually use it properly. And yes, the same applies here, WG catering to the plebs, trying to make the game appeal more to the lowest common denominator. And in the end, the game will just become point and click, and the fans who were here from the start will have moved on because they enjoyed a tactical game, not a point and click shooter.
  5. Not really, BB population is still going up slightly so the number of DD's alone isn't enough to balance them out. We need CV's in every high tier match perhaps.... Or better yet, just a MM which caps classes so players playing every class can have a fun and engaging gaming experience
  6. mtm78

    0.6.3 Public Test Patchnotes

    Well the ship really needed it right, it's requires so much hard work to beat an Imperator Nicolai in w/r /sarcasm Yeah... great and really needed change
  7. That's without a doubt part of it.
  8. mtm78

    0.6.3 Public Test Patchnotes

    It's more telling where these kind of people use the term 'cancer' for. It absolutely disgusts me, to the point I think they should visit a cancer center and spend a day there talking with actual people having cancer.
  9. Those are some big pink colored spectacles. I see people getting corrected harshly yes, but not those with an 'alternative opinion', not at all. People who get more harshly corrected are those spewing 'alternative facts', you know the kind which claims there were more people at the inauguration of president X then at the one from president Y. Translated to this game, one such 'alternative fact' might be people thinking there isn't a BB overpopulation issue. but instead there might be to many DD's And even those people aren't insulted, just corrected.
  10. You know what really sucks when you use anecdotal evidence? That's there is no such thing http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/76816-has-wargaming-lost-control-or-interest-arguments-by-developers/page__st__80__pid__1724819#entry1724819
  11. mtm78

    0.6.3 Public Test Patchnotes

    Come on, we all know Arkansas Beta really really really needed a buff
  12. mtm78

    Matchmaking Chart

    Doesn't work, trust me I know from experience The frustration doesn't abide unless something actually indicates there is a chance, there is hope. And this patch won't be that one.. the only hope is the next patch after it.
  13. mtm78

    Akizuki, advice needed (HE, AP, IFHE....)

    Before listening to people, make sure they are in a position to actually give advice about anything.
  14. Because the site obviously can not store all daily datasets but aggregates them periodically.
  15. SF was never the issue really with Gremmy, it's fast, agile, 130mm stalinium and 8km fishes.
  16. Ow boy... expecting 10v10 Gremmy's really soon, with 1 BB and 1 CL per side to help with balance
  17. I hear my government might still have some here and there... esp. on the municipalities level Those are all off the grid though ( or so I hope... ).
  18. mtm78

    Balance changes

    So.. you look at that chart and claim HE + FiRES do more damage then AP? When has AP been nerved ... that is up to them.
  19. I would have no troubles trading long range broadside citadels with higher angled damage mitigation. Being caught broadside means you got outplayed, well not now with 40% + BB population, but when they finally manage to lower that you should be able to track the BB's in the game and make sure you're not giving broadside to a BB which is loaded and has his guns aimed in your general direction. Hope is something which keeps me from giving up. I mean I will buy back some mid tier BB's and keep playing VMF DD's, perhaps go up the GE DD line a bit as well. But it will be my hope that WG will eventually fix their mess that keeps me interested in the long run..
  20. BB population is > 40%, DD population is way lower. Facts man, facts and no whining like you You really think that when they finally manage to lower BBaby population, people will not play cruisers more? And with more cruisers, playing DD's get's less and less 'easy mode'. Ow wait, that might require actually thinking things through. Also.. Yeah... again, facts man, those cold nasty hard facts. Which equals the FACT that you are in fact a BB main. Just as I am a CRUISER main, wether you like it or not....
  21. mtm78

    Akizuki, advice needed (HE, AP, IFHE....)

    I have a 19p captain in her, I have two high point IJN DD captains atm, guess I will move on to a Nagato or something ( I liked playing Nagato... ).
  22. mtm78

    The sad state of the Yubari

    Nah rather go boost the ship you already have a 62% wr in right
  23. It's a damn shame WG doesn't want to give Jammin the decryption key
×