-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mtm78
-
GOOD players use teamlist to compose strategy in randoms ( or do risk assessment if you want to call it that ). Remove ship list and they will just play passive as they can't predict anything. You people might think that will be fun, but it will only be fun if you like seeing more passive play.
-
Yeah BabyKim got his terminology mixed up I guess
-
Did I miss a PN? Low tier all got ROF reduced in 6.3.1. edit: I guess you mean they got a loading time increase ( which is the same as a ROF decrease )
-
They have been late due to unforeseen circumstances before, but we always got the rewards in the end. I wouldn't worry to much about it now, just keep checking your email for when you can redeem them.
-
Which begs the question: howcome they are being nerved, did they really perform that good ( all of them )? I'm also worried about the mid high tiers, flamu isn't liking them and he's usually right on ship balance... well maybe he is wrong about all the French, he was wrong about the Dunkek Still, I really hope the reduced drag will give the AP some actual meaning. The rof is still terrible compared with Moskva though.
-
http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/77038-french-cruisers-looking-good/page__st__120__pid__1742396#entry1742396 Datamining is also a thing. Just as reading topics
-
3 seemed pretty good, that turret layout on tier 3 is... yeah ok. But it was indeed quite heavy handed. I hope you don't mind I am not looking forward to 60% BB population ( if GE BB's can cause over 40%, RN BB's with all the 'anxious anticipation' displayed on the forums should easilly top that with 20% ). Here's to hoping WG will finally limit MM so we don't get full BB games, and in between those fun games with 8 DD's per side edit: 'knowing ships well' is NOT 31% win rate. That is 'NOT knowing a ship well'
-
Molotov is better, don't really like her as she is fast but can't turn so it's quite the passive playstyle but those Donskoi gun's on tier 6 are nice for sure I hated Kirov while grinding her, which is odd as I loved her when I was testing her. Guess when testing people didn't know how glass canon she was so there was less focus. On topic again, don't understand the rof nerfs for the lower tiers but I guess they were overperforming to much in the hands of the ST's. Just hope WG realized they SHOULD overperform as most ST aren't potato and low tiers is sealclubbing.
-
Kirov STRONK! I mean, well... he says it is super strong! Don't forget Kirov has very STRONK AP, and that you need to maneuver and get into optimal position while going for citadels! I hope not, let's leave it as Kirov being stronk shall we? And if you consider that ( img ) stronk, it's easy to understand how the low tier French baguettes are also good.
-
Shima was my second tier X, Zao my first, Yamato my third. Guess it's not a OP ship thing but a IJN thing I also have a Hindenburg now btw Also. claiming Shima was ever OP is just... I do hear Udaloi is actually fun...
-
Indeed, definitely not needed at all.
-
Two days before I got Shima -> IJN torps nerved Now sitting on Trashkent and getting closer to Khaba -> Khaba nerved At least they aren't nerving my other new tier X Moskva
-
Stealth-fire - now available for BBs! [Video inside]
mtm78 replied to ForlornSailor's topic in Videos & Streams
Wew what a clickbait But yeah ofc that works, and it works for all classes sadly so I can't post some anti bb complaints here, saying WG should stahp spoiling players of other classes so much by making them better and better by buffing BB's so they ... ow wait... I think I got that wrong -
This only would make sense in a competitive environment not in randoms as they are campy enough already.
-
So , they are buffing IJN DD's turrent rotation speed ...
mtm78 replied to MurderousKitten's topic in Destroyers
Current is 2.5km and they are slower iirc... not sure, they NERVED them right before I unlocked Shima......... -
With removal of stealth fire, a nice addition to the game will be:
mtm78 replied to Kazomir's topic in General Discussion
Yeah cruisers OP right, that is why it's your least played class other then carriers Btw, my Zao would love Gearing reload... sadly it doesn't have it. -
So , they are buffing IJN DD's turrent rotation speed ...
mtm78 replied to MurderousKitten's topic in Destroyers
During 'happy days' of WoWs, IJN DD were feared for being the best torpedo platforms in the game... I wouldn't mind having those days brought back ( no that's not the old 20 km torps.. I will settle with 12km torps with decent speed AND good concealment ). -
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
They listened to lwm, she said Duca was a bad ship which needed to be played at range -
Blys has enough utility, it can cap and stealth torp, and it has good dpm even at the ranges where it can successfully evasion tank. As Nechrom said it wasn't a ship like Akizuki which relied heavily on not getting spotted.
-
You mean...
-
I expect Blys to not get buffed even if it drops in performance. Because I expect it will be still better then other DD's in it's tier, and WG will claim they don't want to buff a ship which isn't underperforming in comparison with others.
-
Content was the same. Neither did I. I just deny, without a shadow of a doubt, that the two 'cheats' that ..... 'guy' ..... posted are actually 'cheats'. The first was a video about damage saturation which was turned into a hoax to fool the 'stupid people' ( it succeeded ). The second was a video showing the usage of a well known 3rd party application which I described in an earlier post, which can do nothing in a server authoritative environment. Those 'cheats' both are not possible. Just as circumventing the server authoritative spotting mechanics. I will say it again: they are not possible. Which is the same as Blue_Bug said btw, maybe with lesser words. I also made a mistake in my post -> It wasn't 'all'. Hitbox skins don't need python access for instance. I'm an Aspie, being condescending will just tire you out ;) Scepticism is good, as long as it has a foundation. What is yours? What of the things I said about server authoritative gaming environments are causing you to be sceptic? ~~ It's easy to cry wolf, like that other poster, but in most cases there are no cheats in play. Even when there was a freely available aim assist, the consensus was that the impact was very low ( WG said the number of users was really low ). The biggest problem was that it ruined the environment, people saw aim assists everywhere, any time someone died you read in ingame chat that the other was a dirty cheater. Luckily this has gotten lots better when WG publicly forbid the usage, and then closed of python access. You can still develop python based mods, they have a wgAPI which is a WIP atm but it allows restricted access to the python game engine.
-
I don't buy those anyway
-
The armor is something which needs to be buffed, you can't have a ship with worse offensive capabilities then Moskva and also worse protection.. .ow wait... Needs 32mm deck armor at the least. Not sure how to 'fix' her as I am not sure what WG wants her to be. Can't be what she is now though as I think only fanbois would play her.
-
New trend: DDs now camping behind the BBs
mtm78 replied to G01ngToxicCommand0's topic in General Discussion
But I wasn't commenting on your stats, just on your comment that you didn't notice more campier game in mid tiers I think players like you is what keeps the game going, WG is not a charity and there are more then enough freeloaders already. I've spend quite some money on the game already as well, and while I am starting to regret it for some part it's still nothing I would ever use against anyone, on the contrary even.
