mtm78

Always seems to happen when people come claim about how balance is bad because they ships they play the most aren't invincible. Let's get back to topic then: BB's need to be limited to 3-4 per team MAX

You're mistaken, last guy who complained about 'forum dwellers' called us DDorks and said we all wanted our Shima's to stay OP or sumtin Guess it's more the case of what a person complains about as opposed to the class 'forum dwellers' main in

That's nice indeed, but don't stay kicking puppies forever ok

Won't happen this patch, think S_O said 6.6.

Wrong, DD is about PREDICTING. Not dictating, not even close. Edit: ofc this is torpedo DD's and not VMF gunboat line but there you're also not dictating but kiting ships from range.

When RNG says yes -> wow there is so much luck in / I am having so much luck When RNG says nope -> wow there is so much RNG in this game / I am having so much bad luck Happy to see a new happy sailor, even if it's just because RNGesus smiled upon him

WG has commented on their client-server model more in WoT, it's the same engine ( some modifications ofc ). And as I said, BigWorld is a commercial engine there are enough resources around if you care to look for them. Not taking my word for it is fine with me, but 'waiting for WG to hold your hand' is not. Do your own research. The BigWorld development forums are closed and their license includes an nda, but there is enough information around. As to your closing paragraph, I'm very susceptible to facts and not opinions. Provide me with facts and I will adjust my opinion accordingly. Provide me with conjecture and bias and I will ridicule it.

His Sims is okish though. Everything else above tier 5 he got is meh... So BB not being a potato and sailing straight is not depending on other people's input? Well it does, I mean it requires BBaby to not use WASD.exe. And BBaby using right mouse button and deleting a cruiser even while he's properly angled, that's only because the cruiser was a baddie who doesn't know how to play? Pathetic argument. Really? Ow wait, low tier stuff yeah.... Stop making blatant statements about things you know nothing about. Wtf man, and this is a beta tester... Totally out off touch with reality.

What is actually funnier is that if I wanted to sealclub I should do it in Arkansas, it's clearly the better ship....

At least I stopped playing my OP ship when I couldn't meet tier VI with it, you're still in denial and calling your most played ship 'balanced'. No wonder no one takes you serious

What's wrong with those people right, still not actually seeing the frigging actual issues here.... paints a sad picture of humanity I'm afraid.

I had the same encounter with a Neptune, he cought me pretty flat and did 6k salvo but the moment I angled correctly it was <1k. As you say though, I think the guy was a shitter as his aim was terribad and I expect to eat way more dmg facing even EU randoms.

Remember guys, Belfast is balanced and it's not because I play it a lot

Mass affects draft. drafts and hull shape = friction. That's about it right?

Finally something we agree on Hardcap BBabies -> better game for everyone.

Afaik that's to a degree on purpose, since even a developer ( or, perhaps even especially a developer ) can not base balance on just his own experience. Everyone is biased, the one's who don't admit to it the most ( usually ). So using numbers leaves out any personal bias ( well perhaps when they set the actual figures they WANT in the game.. ).

Stahp feeding me earth and heaven... I would say heaven and hell but hey semantics right..

If they gave Mogami MK's range I would probably never play MK again unless in a division with a CV where I know my AAA will make a difference. The smoke on MK does not outweigh the beauty and the fun of all those 155mm shells. ps my 2 ( extremely low sample size ) did not see those instant deletion / stray citadels everywhere salvo's, but perhaps I was lucky idk Mogami A hull was always squishy but that was in my belief more the bad rudder shift making dodging hard. And, there weren't 6+ BB's in either of my game's so I actually could angle pretty well and track the BB's who were aiming for me.

I know I checked I also don't think it's a bad buff, I see a lot of especially Montana's which snipe and use the excuse of 'bad citadel'. If they kemp blue line after the buff it's clear they're just BBabies But hey, he's buddies with mon ami so I didn't expect normal behavior from him you know edit: btw, just to be sure -> only reason I don't mind another BB buff is because I've given up on normal MM balance, if WG continues this way nothing will change. They need to add restrictions to the MM for more classes then CV's.

So salty, I like it! *slow clap* Off course you would call it that, seeing you're the kind which thinks discussing balance and having a private profile is not conflicting in any way Ow and I can read, maybe you should learn to write coherent English 'kiddo'

I might have had something to do with that http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/76592-tool-a-program-to-collect-and-analyze-personal-farm-of-exp-and-credits/page__fromsearch__1 xD Nice to see him staying active right Site already was so much better than the other one, and now it will be even better!

Other two ships... you only talk about NCal, Iowa and Monty... Take away Monty and you keep two others? Yeah, looking at profiles is soooooo baaaaaad.... it's totally uncalled for! And trolling? You mean mon ami ThinderChief who's been spewing his nonsense around and lying about almost everything he writes? Wew.. talking about bias, guess you really don't like people who look at your profile ps: I can see why you hid it, sad choice I would sooner try and improve

That's more a CA class issue then just a Mogami issue. Any BB citadels CA's disregarding anging.

Asking for BBaby buffs for ships which are already KNOWN to get citadel placement buffs Ncal btw is NOT getting a buff, it already has a low citadel afaik. BB's shouldn't be able to sail broadside to other BB's..............