-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mtm78
-
But you can not learn PvP gameplay in PvE, sure you can learn to smoke allies, how to angle and how to lead your shots, but you're missing the human element on those enemies. Win rate in PvE says nothing, teamplay in PvE says almost nothing, as long as not to many die within a minute you can solo carry PvE games. Heck I have a 100% win rate in PvE for a reason ( stronk team's always carry me ). I got nothing against PvE, heck I want WG to extend on PvE modes. Give me proper escort missions, heck give me ASW missions if you really want subs in the game. But you can not equally reward PvE and PvP, because they require less effort. PvE was added as a training mode, as a way to test new ships. It was not intended in it's current form to allow players to progress to tier X by soly playing PvE. WG has already made PvE more profitable because there are so many more people enjoying PvE then they anticipated, and that's a good thing. But the rewards shouldn't be increased even more without PvE actually evolving into something more worthy as a game mode. And I say that because while it might not seem likely to you, but heck if I knew I would be able to progress to tier X doing easy mode in the same time as it would be while doing hard mode, I would do it not always but for lines where I just want to get the end game content. I can always go back and play PvP with the intermediate ships later, there is no need to do the hard mode PvP to do the grind ( other then PvP grinding should actually improve how you play over time ). How would that feel for people who grind PvP, and do hard work trying to win as many games as they can in PvP as winning gives an XP boost, when I do maintain ~100% win rate in PvE?
-
I will watch it when I get back from this afternoon from my daughters swim class Thanks for including the replay, next time do it in the opening post though
-
So you agree with what I said, nice to hear
-
I don't feel victim at all when there are 'only' 3 friendly BB's. I know I can gang up with some friendly cruisers and take on any isolated enemy BB who thinks he is Rambo incarnated. edit: though that being said, there are to many lolpen citadels on properly angled cruisers.
-
They are NOT. It's EU wehraboos playing tier 7 - 8 - 9 German battleships which is causing the issue. This just proofs that WG can not balance in game class distributions through performance.
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
This should be posted in the news thread not the discussion thread, people might miss it otherwise ( and it certainly consists of news ). -
So don't division tier 7 with tier 8 PERIOD, if WG doesn't threat mixed divisions as all the same tier as the highest in the division, people can abuse it to get better matchmaking. The tier 8 could avoid getting into tier X for instance. And that is RIGGING. Rigging is bad mkay
-
hahahahahahahahahahahah You're forgetting how easy it is to get those numbers in coop vs pvp
-
Did WG adjust over earnings? Don't remember seeing something like that in the patch notes.
-
1st game. Not to shabby, went for range bur ended up rushing two bb's and finishing them off.
-
As long as people have a 45% difference in win rate... hell no. Remember you get more XP in victory.. you want PvE peasants to be privileged for playing easy mode? When WG get's around to making PvE challenging to the same extent as PvP then sure... until that time, it's a training mode. Training mode's are not supposed to give equal rewards period.
-
Ow those language barriers need to be shot on sight! The tier 9 isn't bad either.. first game ->
-
Yeah getting bugs is good... This however is a not a bug, it was crying about mixed divisions not being able to rig matchmaking. He then switched to 'MM unfair balance' to make the argument less pathetic. Switching two tier X cruisers has NOTHING to do with 7-8 divisions cry cry coming into cry cry tier X matchmaking cry cry.
-
Wth you rambling about, where was this about gamemodes? It was about letting people grind equal rewards for less effort in PvE vs PvP. Heck I been asking for PvE scenario's for ages..... you know, actual challenging missions on PvE like the escort mission they spoiled us with for Halloween....
-
Well WG did just buff IJN torps on top tiers, so there's that..
-
Baguette isn't terribad, only one game but it was pretty decent.
-
You mean crap players aren't playing there?
-
So you want -> Ok, why not, PvE same reward, but then PvP get's a 50% wr requirement
-
Time played Ye we need PvE people grinding to high tiers and then joining PvP and be useless for their teams. 49% vs 96% says it all.
-
And that is FINE, since BB's shouldn't counter DD's anyway.
-
Lol OP has 96% wr in COOP.... and 49% in actual PvP.... And he wants the same rewards....
-
Lmao pve same rewards.... PVE is easy mode..... 100% wr is not uncommon... same rewards... wew what a [edited]request.
-
That is more a case off..
-
It's an excellent idea, if you don't like it, don't mix tiers within a division.
-
I almost always poi on pts, never gotten insulted for it
