mtm78

What kind of argument is that... Based on? What is 'your' alternative then?

Yes, use FP is wish and manage repair and heal correctly.

Again, look at why you don't seem to benefit from this 'broken' mechanic and only seem to get punished by it. Unless you can show ships which 'spam he+fires' even in YOUR hands would do so all the time, it seems a bit misplaced to complain being on the receiving end of it. Ow wait you just cried about being in a game filled with he spamming DD's and cruisers... yeah right. 42% and climbing boy, keep dreaming

You must be new here Well tbf, GE DD's were buffed, before their concealment debuff was larger than their fire range. And they buffed top tier IJN torps last patch, slightly ( but probably still quite significant in impact ). Ok serious reply then, if fires are so OP why are they not giving you those OP results? If you're arguing about performance factors, it's eluding me to why you're arguing fires are to powerful when the ships which benefit from that trait are not even doing that well in your hands? Is it that you are only suffering from the receiving end? If so, the answer would be increasing your situational awareness and prevent being focused down by HE spamming cruisers which bait your repair party without you having a way out.

Yeah speed boost on them would have been much better right Because every time you cry on the forums WG delays them. Ow, and the Italians want a word with you And the French... and heck where are my VMF carriers who won the war for us? Yup, those pesky numbers again... clearly a trash ship.. ow wait, you want average? Really.... please stop crying so much, it's sad. There is nothing wrong with that ship, just as there is nothing wrong with the DD and there is nothing wrong with the CL line ( from tier 6 up they are among the best in the game ).

No it was just that concealment debuff wasn't tied to the gun choice but hull. So 203mm on A hull would have had same concealment debuff as 155 on A hull, but when you went to B and above the 155's had the same debuff as the 203's.

See above. That is the actual definition of something which overperforms. edit: Either that or remove the tier 8 concealment module.

cry a lot. Want a tissue? Why my nation has smoke cruisers, why my nation cruisers are amongst the best in the game? Why do I need more skill in my nation cruisers? Why can't I play them from second or third line like I do with all my other ships? Why can't I have an 'my nation cruisers are exactly playable in the way I were already accustomed to' button in this game? Ow and Stop worrying and learn how to play them, you might find they are actually among the best ships in the game if you have the skills needed to play them correctly. Also please stop embarrassing yourself further.

Yeah, god forbid the Germans having actually having some skilled captains right...

I hope you're not expecting anything sensible...

I like your signature

Ibuki also isn't a DD hunter. If you want to hunt DD's go play VMF DD line ( leading to Khaba ) or get a USN DD.. or get a RN CL. CA's aren't for going after DD's in current high BB population meta anyway. Ibuki is also a long range HE spammer. Zao has kinda trollish armor but it also plays best at range certainly at the start of games. When the numbers have thinned a bit you can go toe to toe with ships in closer ranges but don't play like that at the start of games. If the hectic cqc combat is what you like, take a gunboat DD / RN CL ( though those are quite smoke dependent ) or stick to lower tiers. Without IFHE you rely on fires. My dmg is all from before IFHE, and most of it was on BB's. Mogami was my favorite cruiser back when AFT worked up to 155, it was the ultimate tier 8 BBQ ship. edit: btw, some people do play Mogami aggressive, and they think it's 'fun' to kill a DD and then die... so it's not really impossible to go after DD's.. but you won't get consistent good results playing like that.

Well the 40% accuracy module goes in practise mean that your effective dpm is comparable with a 6 gun variant.. or close enough. And the torps are really bad angle but you can sometimes surprise people with them when ambushing them behind islands. You can't really use them otherwise as Yubari is a floating citadel ( even more then other tier 4 cruisers ). The idea of an alternative hull you can unlock with doubloons doesn't sound bad at all, you should propose it to WG directly in one off the Q&A's

Function over form at it's finest. Configuration will be fun, better then Mogami Izumo with the C turret facing forward instead of backward. Imagine if they actually built them with all 3 turrets superimposing It will be most interesting since gun performance should be a lot different then other RN BB's, with a lighter shell fired at higher velocity. But she won't be able to fire all 3 turrets without giving enough broadside to get citadelled I recon -> Even worse since the AAA we get in their place is so abysmal ( 25mm IJN blerghhh ). edit: idk how I put a Mogami in that sentence

No ship beats Yuubari though.. Even in game she's quite the looked

Yeah IFHE really made fire chance go through the roof... Also, please explain if fire's are so OP why does your MK suck so much with 20k average damage

I'm stealing that gif

It might be just me, but I don't really find any of the higher tier BB's pleasing to the eye. After Kongo it's all basically downhill, and while I know that even older designs were always function over form it feels like it does get worse the further up the tiers you go. With cruiser's it's not as fixed, I love Zao's appearance and I even find Hindenburg as 'pleasing' to see... infact I think Hindenburg looks like a mini BB and I kinda like that. I will not like Hood from what I've seen, it's just to bulky. Might play really nice, but she aint no looker.

Flamu just uploaded a Mogami game, I would start there. Basically it's a very high dpm glass cannon which turns badly, so don't go chase DD's in it but stay at range and use islands as much as possible ( esp. in the BB heavy meta, and especially now tier 8 is uptiered so much ).

Yeah, horrifically bad ship man wew, 100% proof of the anti RN bias WG has

I averaged 54k avg dmg on Mogami with 64% win rate, it's nice to know you had no problems using C hull on yours though Hint: we're talking about optimal configuration. Yeah sorry you're correct, C hull is just small AAA increase.

Pff Nelsol and Rodnol never were 'aesthetically' pleasing.... I still want them though

Mogami on PTS was fun, and yeah defo take C hull since it has more hp and better rudder shift.

Why doesn't forum have -1's again? Would be much easier to give this thread the response it deserves... It's more like -> edit: also, ofc people cry about lacking range when they lack situational awareness

I would just like to point out how seemingly teamkills also count towards your XP as the Yamato in question got better rewards then 3 others in your team. Since you were 3rd, it's strange to think this all happened right at the start of the battle btw.