mtm78

So that is why it had such an abysmal immunity zone for 38cm shells from Bismarck? The armor was lacking in places. The belt armor was ok for a ship her age ( though that also means she loses about 10% of her armor efficiency from what i read ). But deck armor was not. And her FC system was severely outdated ( refit would not just be defensive, her offensive capabilities would be upgraded probably more then her armor ).

Can I still complain? I don't use diseases I just tell BB's with full hp and a spotter plane at the end of a match how ffin useless they are. There was a time I was getting chat bans every day.. I uploaded a replay and made a thread for getting a chat ban because I was telling a Chappy he could have done even better if he didn't go to A but helped with B -> chat ban. System is broken, period. Now, Corvi is quite toxic no doubt, I mean people using cancer in chat should be banned ( just as those using it on forum though.... and that's also not happening any more it seems.. bring back BBV plox! ).

You're whole post reeks from hate to people who do better at the game then you. ... why is it unnecessary to reward people who do well in the game? You think only baddies should get rewards, to keep them interested? Lol, you think you get to tell people to not discuss things on a discussion board? Ha, you're funny. Uhm, you really would be swayed by a simple linking to profiles which joined later than me and who are better at the game or will you still ask for more 'proof' that there isn't some tampering going on somewhere? New players of the same skill play on lower tiers and gain the same win rate as existing good players on higher tiers while gaining XP on their captains so that when they move up in tiers they will have competitive captains in comparison with existing good players since there is a cap on the amount of points you can put on a captain. If you think this is not possible, why do you think people reroll to get better stats They are baddies. Period. It's you who connects some emotional value to it, not me. And yes, I would not miss a few baddies leaving, since I also said it's not just them leaving but also the good players. So if ONLY the good players left, that would actually be worse for the game... Yes I was talking from my own perspective. I'm an individual you know, I don't represent a bigger entity ( well, maybe those with half a brain.. at times ). No, that's the criterion of a players worth to WG. I am not WG, I care more of the value of players on my team to actually understand how to play. Different perspectives of worth, both equally valid. You sound like it's about you, or 'WG's lacking policy since they focus to much on 'good players''. You don't even realize that WG isn't considering how well you play, they consider how high tier you play ( mission / campaign requirements ). And you know what, that's not because of 'skill' but economics. So maybe you should think again about what you're rambling about as it seems you're projecting your inability of doing better on WG having 'wrong priorities' leading to benefits only for 'better players'.

I resent being called lucky, it was all skill no luck! And stupid? Ow boy now you done it, I'm going to press that report option 7 times just for you, because I'm not stupid I'm just easilly offended on the internet! ....

BB's are effective enough already, and don't need buffs? Sure if you want to make a proposal where the game is balanced and BB's have less RNG be my guest make it... USN BB's already got a buff to their close range accuracy and it IS non linear at close range.

So toxic man, wew. You should be perma banned on all games for calling someone a lucker!

So you admit to abusing the report system, how nice Wait for a certain person to say you're toxic and the system works as intended, even if you get false reports leading to a chat ban

Hood was a BC, it had a VERY small immunity zone against even Bismarck's shells. If you want to claim otherwise, please link me some references stating otherwise?

Assumptions are bad mkay. Baddies leaving wouldn't be as bad for the game as loosing the good players which are actually the advertisement for the game. Name me ONE streamer with a below average win rate and a healthy viewer base? One YT content creator then? Mhm... guessed so. Either way, I know a lot of those nasty 'unicums' which are taking breaks or outright leaving. Stop hating people who do better then you, it's looking quite sad tbh. I know many people with > 60% wr which joined WAY later then me. I also know beta testers with a 44% win rate. Sorry, you're statements are wrong. Maybe you should like uhm..

Well these Unguided Projectiles were WG's big ' new ' weapon system, I just guess they made them bad because public wouldn't like it if they gave BB's actually workable AAA consumable. For me it would be a big no no, I don't want more BB's having cruiser consumables. But, in this form it's ' useless ' for long drops, but with x25dmg in that small bubble, any CV which makes a mistake and tries to short drop or drop with a DB squad while df is active will pay for it. Not sure what WG should do tbh.

Didn't they fix that by making the gun's not fire at the same time but with a very small delay per barrel? Or was that the French quadruple turrets?

I posted about that in the other thread, 2.1km max range on specced AAA setup... so it basically only counters USN DB's wait.. 1.5 base + 20% aft + 20% AA range mod right? Not that anyone would spec it for that not when it's still useless.

The rng is not something I like, but if you remove it it means those who can aim will see large damage increases. It's the most frustrating part of playing BB's. If you want less rng / dispersion, stick with cruisers.

You think you should be doing more damage?

Even flamu get's chat abuse man, you should watch his streams it's funny as hell. Usually those are the people ending in the bottom of the team in the scoreboard off course Look, with BB meta you are FORCED to snipe, simple as that. I was pretty aggressive when I started playing, it was glorious. Brawling ships, getting those juicy AP citadels. But then BBabies flocked to the game, and we got more BBabies per game then cruisers. That means cruisers who play aggressive in the open are just damage pinjata. And that's not just French cruisers.

That Baltimore and St Louis probably had so much fun!

qft, Hood should have never been the lead ship engaging Bismarck, it was only done because she was the 'flagship' and because PoW was not in real fighting condition.

Still applies. Nothing worth crying over on the forums.

Only 2 tier 7's and you're crying? Wew.... Yup that covers it.

Bro do you even twitch bro? Bad guns my arse. Don't go on what other SAY, go WATCH good players play the ship Well yeah, but broken premiums cause harm due to excess salt from the ships it encounters in her imbalanced broken state.

But enough is enough, it's like people who complain that Bismarck should be a tier X because it's the best BB ever built ( I recall reading that on this forum ... ). Wouldn't she be in the tech tree? And WG can mix classes, South Dakota class is tier 8 just as North Carolina class on the USN line edit: also see my previous post, I'm not saying she should be tier 8, just that if the teaboos have their way with buffs she has nowhere else to be than in tier 8. With superior you mean; "in need of lots of allies to beat ze Germans" right? We all know it was teamwork which won the war, not just Earl Grey no sugar teaboos ;)

You do realize the Hood pre buff was already doing excellent in a good players hand? So my comment was not intended to be read like: it was not competitive and needs refit, but that IF people cry about wanting a refit to be implemented in the game she would have to be up tiered as she would be faceroll on tier 7? Normalization change is faceroll.. but fuse buff is even more faceroll... make BB AP even more effective against DD's plox WG we need less DD's ok Yeah, if you think ' anti bias ' is going after the people who are ACTUALLY going against the teaboo bias asking for buffs to ships they haven't even played yet The Brits are the whiny one's here, not the one's pointing out they are prematurely crying and being worse then the wehraboos.

Stop being such a teaboo ffs I wouldn't mind having a post refit Hood... at tier 8 edit: as to people crying; go watch someone good play the ship on Twitch and stop those salty tears.

Hi Why do you write posts like this all the time? ps stahp using red text, it's for moderators only.

Community team generally doesn't work during weekends You need to buy more premium ships if you want WG to pay them overtime