-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mtm78
-
Ofc the player matter, that doesn't exclude the need to balance ship type's though.
-
So that's the explanation for the success of World Of Warplanes
-
Depends on how lucky you are, historical hit ratio's were way below what we have in game, but the effects of a single hit are irl I think a bit more then what we see in game
-
paint.exe comes with every windows version since win95 iirc Not that you need to, don't think anyone would not believe onesided matches happening when they put 3 OPfast's and a hydro DD in one team against a team without radar. The problem is, if those Belfast were NOT in a division, the MM should have not stacked them all in the same team.
-
Better give out more tinfoil hats, mostly to that 'mate' of yours. It's a nice try though, I mean you actually had people wondering about it.
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Lol... it's a premium, expect regular line to be worse in comparison. Compare Lenningrad with it's same tier line DD -
That the personal opinion of people. Which was well known before you bought her. Actual average P E R F O R M A N A N C E however says she is fine. And that means way more then anyone's personal opinion. Doesn't mean flamuu is wrong, the ship isn't good. But there are enough bad players playing to not punish the ship for it's weaknesses, and enough decent players playing the ship to make use of her relative strengths. Sadly, you don't fall in that category.
- 38 replies
-
- Dunkerque
- Battleships
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I keep seeing it being called 'the passive meta'
mtm78 replied to ilhilh's topic in General Discussion
48% BB population at tier 8, mostly Bismarck and Tirpitz. Kind of explains the scenario you described ( except for meeting the Iowa's and occasional FdG ( where are the Missouri's btw? ) Haven't played much lately but I don't think this is true. Zao is as viable as it was with a slight reduction due to no longer being able to stealth fire, and strangely enough I kind liked Hindenburg anyway.. and Moskva well only a few games so idk how much I like her yet but she is certainly 'playable'. Thing is though, they are playable if you long range spam with them, you can't close distance, need to keep range between you and excess amount of BB's in game so you don't eat lolpen citadels to often. Exactly. -
Ow this could be a lengthy discussion... if I thought it would have any worthwhile effect. But I suspect you're going to feel offended if I offer evidence that the only constant in all your games is you, as opposed to the only constant in for instance my games, is me. This would automatically lead to the argument that if this is the only constant, that taking into account enough individual games, the difference in performance would correlate to the difference in player skill. Also, WR roughly correlates roughly with damage as well, for individual ships it is very probably that someone with higher average damage then me will also have a higher individual win rate, again given enough games in that ship. Sorry, I said I wouldn't because I expected you to claim it's all bs anyway, and that because WoWs is a team game your statistics don't show your actual skill. I will try to listen to myself more next time, deal? edit: Nope.gif. Average stats come from how well players do WITH the ship.... you know, the ship actually influences the outcome.. like a lot... And you been shown evidence that what you're saying is bullocks. She is amongst the best performing BB's of her tier.
- 38 replies
-
- Dunkerque
- Battleships
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I keep seeing it being called 'the passive meta'
mtm78 replied to ilhilh's topic in General Discussion
So let them leave....... We don't need BBaby 'not interested in optimal game balance' *&$^^&$%&^$% ' players '. Others seem to do perfectly fine with the MM as it is, maybe it's more a player ' skill ' thingie? -
Bow tanking is really kek in that thing
- 38 replies
-
- Dunkerque
- Battleships
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I keep seeing it being called 'the passive meta'
mtm78 replied to ilhilh's topic in General Discussion
No unlimited bait works? -
Master of Orion is a WG title ( well the newest one, and next one's unless WG sells the rights ).
-
I keep seeing it being called 'the passive meta'
mtm78 replied to ilhilh's topic in General Discussion
Try google... or here -> http://www.funnyjunk.com/Bait+stay+night/funny-pictures/5890165/ I was told it's out of date to many times as almost all the boxes are ticked already. And I don't want WG to be reminded of the boxes which are left -
He considers it the weakest tier 6 BB, and that is mostly because of the armor. It has the weakest bow, and the most 25mm plating ( it's HUGE ). So, you can't really avoid taking damage with skill ( aka angling correctly ). Which is what puts him off. The guns are also meh, but still afaik he said on stream the biggest issue with the ship is the lack of damage mitigation ability. That being said, if you look at the average performance, the ship is doing fine. That is because sadly most players are FAR from flamu's level of competence. So they don't even KNOW the actual weakness because damage mitigation is something which didn't come with a picture tutorial. And they play mostly against more 'average' players, who don't kill Dunkek's on sight because they don't know how to take advantage of the weak armor values. I remember him meeting enemy Dunkek's and actually saying: yes thank god, give me more damage and xp pinata's In short: it's the average player base which makes this 'bad' ship perform actually quite average. But OP doesn't fit in 'average' even.
- 38 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- Dunkerque
- Battleships
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Bull... they already have easy mode PvE But I do like PvE missions being added soontm ... ouch Maybe WG can give a team battle even where all maps are bastion
-
Liar. Liar. Show me where flamu is crying for his money back? Or to have it moved to tier 5? Ow wait, that was just you. How about you l2p? Your Fuso and Wyoming had decent WR, but yeah as I expected you got carried to that ( abysmal avg dmg in both ). When you can actually play, you can start crying about 'broken balance'. Until then, you can keep crying about broken balance, but everybody will just make fun off you.
- 38 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Dunkerque
- Battleships
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well duhhh, obviously you should continously check behind you if some no brain ******* behind you isn't launching his 6km torps at enemies 10km away.
-
You should check the proper threads then, and not the pinned one on top of gameplay. WG's Express modpack is updated at most 2 days after EU get's a patch ( because NA -> EU -> RU patch order ).
-
Chinese vessel suspected of illegaly salvaging WWII wrecks...
mtm78 replied to mtm78's topic in Other
I don't want to go into nationalities. perhaps the title is a bit to much? I'm just happy to see something being done, guess it's just that CN is the biggest country there with enough commercial activity which would make illegal salvage on large scale both economically as well as socially viable? Don't really expect the practise to be stopped, the incentive remains large since there is enough economic value in steel, and patrolling each and every wreck site continously is just not possible. Punishing those caught might have a deterring effect though. -
.. has been detained by Malaysian authorities Just remembered I read something about this earlier but it was on a Dutch news site so no point really in linking, but I found this English article as well -> https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2017/05/237943/chinese-vessel-suspected-destroying-sabah-ww2-shipwrecks-finally-caught Sadly not the ship which illegally salvaged the Dutch and English wrecks ( or maybe it did that to.. who knows... ) but I'm still happy to read something is being done against those people.
-
Perhaps the 'bad players who don't listen to advice / don't actually do anything useful / don't try to win the game / don't try to improve themselves' shouldn't play this game, after all they clearly have no interest in how it should be played? Not to mention the people falling in above category who compensate for this by clicking report each time it's pointed out how much they suck at playing the game.
-
Team, why are you all on 1 line, we have cap A it's B and C we need or we lose and they are up to 700 points already so why are you lineriding the 1 line? -> -7 karma ( idk how many for chat reports )... Also.. HELL NO. No manual checks are done. This has been claimed so many times it makes me want to punch my screen. Chat ban is AUTOMATED. Only if you get reported so many times, or when you have a WG employee in your game when you break the rules.. then they can give a signal and influence you bans. But the automated system just counts how many reports you get and hands out 24h bans when you break a threshold. Now, people who receive longer chat bans ( didn't even know it was possible in WoWs really.. ) those are given out manually e.g. with human involvement. 24h chat bans are NOT given with human involvement. And ofc, they claim this is 'working as intended'. I had a thread here with a replay where I got a chat ban right after due to reports in that game and at no point ever did I do anything which would warrant a chat ban. But according to an employee, the system was still working as intended even if I said nothing wrong *insert epic facepalm*.
-
I keep seeing it being called 'the passive meta'
mtm78 replied to ilhilh's topic in General Discussion
edit: See above, he knows he's just bored ;) -
Indeed. Give all tier 8 cruisers heal to start with
