mtm78

1. 661 battles in BB, 102 battles in cruisers If you're so afraid of cruisers, you want to tell us you're not playing them much because you find them to easy/forgiving right 2. Your 'top BB' Nagato -> 52% wr 54k avg dmg Fuso 45% wr 48k avg dmg... my Nagato 71% wr 64k avg dmg Fuso 68% wr 62k avg dmg... Want to tell me to 'l2p' some more

To each his own I guess

Yeah us trolls wanting a fun environment for everyone and not just those who want to play 'kings' who can stump on everyone else... wew the nerf off us right?

Right. But let's start with capping their numbers then we can point out the numbers to everyone from even a normal meta and THEN we can nerf them as much as needed? I've given up on the notion of WG nerving them outright, so as long as they don't limit their numbers meta will continue to be broken. Ok, let's do this. And limit their numbers. In whatever order, as long as it's soontm Which is a problem why?

Mhm I haven't played my tanks in some time, but ok. I heared there been a lot of team killing going on with Fochwagon's... though I expect there are more trolls crying that it happens ( trying to pin that on 'toxic Foch' then trolls in game who actually do it. It's just not something 'trivial'. Copyright infringement strikes for censorship is a bad thing, even if it's just a threat.

Why do you need to get BACK to enjoying the game, did this somehow affect your enjoyment of the game at all?

We agree, as I been saying that WG should just limit the amount of BB's allowed per team just like it limits CV's. No nerfs ( at least not now, not when current meta to me seems so incredibly wrong with to many BB's and not enough cruisers ). Let's see some numbers from when there is a healthy class distribution before making adjustments to make certain classes stronger or weaker, as I don't think you can use current numbers to do so when WG claims it wants to reduce BB population.

Omg another one... BB's are not the problem per se.... the problem is the AMOUNT off them.

Yeah that's not the way to limit their numbers ( making them unable to do their job ).

That's video you should watch, not the first one

Can you cry more of those salty BBaby tears? Cry cry BB's are so bad to play cry cry let's hide my profile so no one can see I play them A LOT actually so I can cry some more about how they are really not fun to play cry cry.

Good you're not worth talking to anyway, at least not about anything related to this forum ( aka this game you're so afraid to show your profile from while you want to participate in balance discussions ). Maybe if you don't want 'drivel' you should stop posting it, and stick with factual discussions which resolve around actual tangible facts instead of salty tears. Don't you want to post about 'iffy smoke shots' while not having a replay?

All players play BB is quite the claim, maybe making it should warrant some proof? I think the biggest problem is not with those players, but those who play BB's almost exclusively. And trust me, we got quite a few of those.

You make good points, and don't get me wrong I don't blame Jingles for anything on the contrary I really think it speaks for him that he was as proactively involved in this as he has been And yeah, perhaps it's a good thing to let them sort out their own internal issues first, though I strongly suspect it's going to be swept under the rug ( that is what Jingles video seemed to indicate to me: ye it's bad, but upper echelon has assured us it will not happen, it was bad what was said but it's ok now ). Which would be 100% acceptable with me if some responsibility was taken, like: I screwed up, I shouldn't have made that threat, Foch I am sorry. And I don't mean the head of community management saying that.

I think they been quite busy, you know damage control and all that

finished video. I am satisfied with the Jingles part which states that the higher ups will NEVER threaten anyone again with a copyright infringement strike unless they actually break nda about something ( which would make it a legitimate strike ). What I strongly dislike from AdmiralHipster/Jingles ( but I can understand, he said so himself he wouldn't want to loose 300k subscribers ) is that he seems to forgo on the threat actually being made. Like; 'well it was said, but they wouldn't actually do it so it's fine', That is highly disappointing. The way WG is handling it is pretty bad, trying to slander Foch and attack his character.. well Jim said it all nicely right Go Jim

I <3 Jim ( I think.. still 10m to go in the video )....

Why the heck did you overlook the actual ffin issue.... Why did the threat occur? Who's responsible? He says it's not from the higher ups, so it points straight to Ph3lan as the one who overstepped and though making a copyright infringement threat ON HIS OWN MERIT would be the right thing to do.

SS, bow and stern all have their HP reduced.

1. It's not 'something being said', they are F A C T S supported with evidence ( like server population numbers,,, you know those things only trolls and stupid people would argue against as being 'FAKE news' or something ). 2. So you want to propagate the myth that BB's take more damage from 'things that spam them' then AP damage? Again something where we have FACTS for which clearly show otherwise? WG posted a damage distribution chart for all the BBabies crying about HE + fire spam, showing that BBabies take most damage from AP not anything else not even combined. But hey... 'FAKE NEWS' right So now we esthablisd that BBabies take more damage from AP then HE + fires, we also removed the myth that BBabies would need to camp more with fewer BB's on enemy team

They were the best shore bombardment platforms ;)

I'm on 2 strikes already I have to thread carefully Feel free to post what I thought was slightly controversial perhaps though

He does have a considerable audience. And I guess WG wanted to extent the CC status to him to SHOW everyone that they can live with criticism. Which is good, and I actually respect WG for it. They knew his content, and how he could tear down any 'decency' boundary if there was something wrong in his eyes. It was probably WG's way to show the community they are listening to critique and that it and those who out it towards them are still considered valuable parts of the community. I liked Foch getting the invitation, I liked it a lot. Did I expect Foch to change a little bit? Yeah I actually did. Or, well I should just say I didn't expect him to change in the other way around. Since the last video was pretty much a 'peak performance' for him, in the negative way though. WG's revoking the CC status is only natural. And perhaps Foch will pick something up from it, in the long run. Heck even for now his viewer count has skyrocketed due to his extended 'fame'. But the growth I had in mind wasn't in that department ;) Anyway, I do feel like Foch could have acted different, but that doesn't weigh up against the DCMA threat. It's not on the same scale. Certainly not with how WG is handling the situation, with first denying and then downplaying the threat. Man up, admit there was an oopsie, and atone for it. Then we can move on.

There is no grey. And I'm not really that young anymore ( nor old though ) and while I'm perhaps somewhat of a idealist I'm more a realist. And an autist, which might also mean the world is pretty black and white ;)

I have ~30 free port slots.. damn containers I had a Kongo picture first time.. I edited it because it was a bit 'explicit' Be happy, otherwise everyone would want to play CV's and your queue time would be horrendous