-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mtm78
-
SAIPAN is a clear cheat. Dot. Change Matchmaking.
mtm78 replied to RedOnly's topic in General Discussion
Go cry more because stupid posts are being laughed at. You defending OP just shows what you really are Cry cry cry cry cry cry cry my epeen is too small cry cry cry cry cry cry cry cry Link us to one off your 'smallest questions which got rude answers'.... I dare you edit: Yeah sure he did.... -
"It's a gamebreaker if you meet him, but not if you don't meet him" is a very bad way of balancing a game imo.
-
SAIPAN is a clear cheat. Dot. Change Matchmaking.
mtm78 replied to RedOnly's topic in General Discussion
-
How can you citadel a ship when you shot bounces off?
mtm78 replied to blindhai's topic in General Discussion
Not if you consider the edit I made. That question at the end of his post wasn't there, the whole topic wasn't a question it was a statement of arrogance. But hey OP has concluded he didn't know it and was happy he could actually learn something new. So case closed I guess. -
Bull. Belfast is BROKEN because is has radar + hydro + smoke + tier VIII concealment module. It's broken in concept. I know baddies who do OK'ish with Belfast but not much better, and that is because no ship actually makes baddies become actually good. It's like people who claim Imperator makes people better players. I have one, I do better in it then my account average but guess what... I do even better with Arkansas Beta then Imperator, yet I haven't seen a Arkansas Beta OP thread in quite some time. What is BAD about Imperator is the CONCEPT. 9 forward facing gun's and very good armor -> that is a CONCEPT, and that is what makes it easy to complain about Imperator ( because yeah it's to easy to do ok in, but it's not OVERPOWERED just broken in concept ). And I seen people with 50% win rate in Imperator... heck I even seen people with sub 50% win rate in Gremmy's... And RL is exactly the same. It's BROKEN in concept.
-
SAIPAN is a clear cheat. Dot. Change Matchmaking.
mtm78 replied to RedOnly's topic in General Discussion
He first tried his mummy and daddy to buy him a Saipan but they said he wets the bed to often for them to give him any allowance. -
SAIPAN is a clear cheat. Dot. Change Matchmaking.
mtm78 replied to RedOnly's topic in General Discussion
Edited. -
Lol, you play lots of BB's right Just as many DD's as BB's in 100% fine. Heck, even 2 BB's and 3 DD's is fine
-
How can you citadel a ship when you shot bounces off?
mtm78 replied to blindhai's topic in General Discussion
I know more about game mechanics then about actual historical naval warfare. And when I'm wrong, I will admit to that, sometimes I even eat my own sweaty socks or post a foot in mouth picture Sometimes people ask for mindbleach afterwards -
C'mon, it's just 16 pages, you can read the topic first right
- 636 replies
-
- battleships
- whinning
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
How can you citadel a ship when you shot bounces off?
mtm78 replied to blindhai's topic in General Discussion
No I don't but if I don't know anything I ASK I don't make drivel statements showing 'proof' with a screenshot when something as a mechanic actually totally eludes me as to it's workings. I am not rude, I'm just as direct as OP is in his 'statement' instead of a QUESTION to explain. That is rude. See above. When I don't know things I ask. Ignorance is never an excuse for not asking for an explanation. It's not me who is 'rude' it's OP in the way he shows his ignorance. And ignorance is FINE, as long as you don't present your own ignorance as arrogance ( as OP did ). edit: Ow and OP is a little ..... because this part -> ... wasn't in his post when I first replied -
How can you citadel a ship when you shot bounces off?
mtm78 replied to blindhai's topic in General Discussion
Not a question about something he/she/it doesn't know anything about, noooo just some drivel. If you don't KNOW SOMETHING, you ask a QUESTION. Or better yet, you do a forum search as this QUESTION has been brought up before. -
Problems with destroyers and portations against battleships
mtm78 replied to bamupa's topic in General Discussion
I didn't see any talking, I saw an awful lot of crying. -
Because they / I were / wasn't wrong Skill is broken, period. Saying it's fine because 90% of players don't know how to use it properly is saying overpowered ships which aren't being sold anymore are fine because not many people will have them. Just to be clear, Adler guy is trying to argue from the impact point of view, and then it might be tolerable due to the amount of baddies not being able to use it properly. I don't care about impact, I care about conception. And RPF is NOT fine. It's a captain perk made to negate actual player skill, a perk to compensate from actual teamplay, a perk to compensate for a lack of situational awareness, a perk which kills off stealth positioning ( flanking to get those nice broadside shots / volleys off ). If you think that's fine, we disagree
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Nah as he said... -
Problems with destroyers and portations against battleships
mtm78 replied to bamupa's topic in General Discussion
Well in that case -
Remember the 'endless waves' mode they had some time ago, idk what it was called. There the ships actually did spawn behind islands and in map corners and so on. I just don't think it's possible to script their behavior correctly when you also allow players free roaming over the entire map. But maybe WG can spawn some short lasting smoke screens and have the ships emerge from those, sure will still not be really realistic but probably more believable and thus less immersion breaking them having them appear out of thin air altogether.
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Didn't we just close those... But yeah, the amount of premiums which are just better then tech tree ships is getting a bit longer on every balance change or premium addition it seems. 1 -
Ye ye, played some more today, just a few games because I got sick of the baddies, but didn't see > 5 BB's per game. That's two days in a row. I'm starting to feel like WG has increased the weighing of the rule a bit And, as I said, OP lacked an actual picture when I posted
-
Problems with destroyers and portations against battleships
mtm78 replied to bamupa's topic in General Discussion
OP didn't put in ANY effort so far into learning the game, in fact he registered to whine like a BBaby about how his BB's are getting killed by DD's and CV's. And no, I didn't see him ASK anything, like: how can I learn to not be so bad? Noooo, the only thing he did was cry that DD's should be nerved, and that CV's should be nerved. Why do you think this warrants a constructive answer? Why do you assume OP will even be able to USE a constructive answer? Why do you think OP will even be back in the topic when he realizes the problem isn't with the game but with himself? You know what, get OP to come back and post he understands it's not the game but him who is at fault, and I will be as constructive as can be, I would even division with the baddie trying to teach him something. Until that, this thread is a lost cause only suited for 'poking the fun' out of a typical BBaby. edit: short version -> I'm not against you putting in an effort to write something constructive. I applaud people writing constructive things. But in this thread, I'm 99.999999% confident you've just wasted your time. This isn't a player who just met their first CV and/or DD... he has tier 8 6 ships ffs. And that's a shame, because if you're going to spend the effort I would hope it worth while. -
Some I expected a picture with this post...
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Balance, available at a premium store near you, for real money only Now who was it who said Fochgate was only concerning Tanks and not Ships? -
Problems with destroyers and portations against battleships
mtm78 replied to bamupa's topic in General Discussion
What???? So, tell me please... what 'issue' did OP make? You can't say: OP says 1 + 1 = 2 so we should discuss 3 x 3 = 9, that's not how normal minds work. OP whined and cried because he is a baddie, a terrible player, a $%#$%#$%, and he dies in his BB's so they must be weak and he shouldn't look at himself nooo it's the game. 'poking the fun', and a LOT off laughter, facepalming and finger pointing is all this topic deserves. -
My Imperator approves. My Gremmy does as well!
-
Hahahahahahaahahahahahahhahaha Bot's cheating.... hahhahahahahahahahahhahaha Wait... you're serious? Really? edit: Ow, on topic: mode is great, finally something WORTH being called PVE. Only 'bad' thing is sometimes it feels ships appear out of thin air ( actually they do... but ok... ), this does kill a lot off immersion.
