mtm78

It's gamefolder\profile

How about Fletcher? Ow wait, isn't that your most played ship? It's always easy to find 'balance issues' in ships you don't play right?

The ONLY tier X you have is a Gearing with 32 battles. What qualifies you to demand nerfs for anything? How about we change the thread to: :"Fletcher needs a nerf"?

Ow btw Philjd I thought your statement about Tirpitz improving over time was relegated to in-game Tirpitz not 'irl'. Sorry for the , it makes a lot more sense now I understand you were talking about the real ship

If you say so, since you seemingly have spent the effort to find it ( how else would you be able to tell how much effort it takes ) you know more then me Seriously, if this is like the aim-assist, it's more the windowlickers who would want to use it thinking it's a replacement for skill.exe then the good players ( though.. rainbow mod sounds actually useful for DD's and cruisers... xray is useless as that info can be had with tapping map key quickly and using 'navigator' mod which shows bearing of selected targets ). I still hated aim-assist though, mostly because it made entire community toxic, everyone who killed someone was suddenly a 100% cheater edit: That would be nice, but it's RU anyway so I would rather see an official statement from WG on this on EU forums..

Two built in ways to find out -> 1. Start -> run -> Resmon ( MS's own resource monitor ). 2. Use 'Process Monitor' from System Internals ( bought by Microsoft ). I don't know from my head but if people can't find it I will check tonight. edit: Link to ProcMon -> https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/processmonitor

If you catch him throwing 'cancer' and other diseases through chat then yes. If you do it because you don't like him, you're the problem not him. To many times I get reports for chat abuse when I didn't deserve it ( way more then when I don't get reports when I might have deserved it.. ).

I don't play CV's but any new line would be nice to see. Though then again, a lot off mid tier games have two cv's and there are still 100+ BB's in queue at all times

How can you tell how many crap players are already using it? And how many more will use it now, since it's allowed by WG?

Looking at professional sports as reference... you might be talking for a very small minority. Rules are in place for anything competitive, heck even amateur sports have referees for a reason ;)

Well if it's 'legal' and it gives an advantage, not using it would put you at a disadvantage?

Yeah, saying that this BBaby catering is driving players away doesn't clearly mean that it's better if they don't do it right We seen you crying that people should stop accept BBaby meta and stop 'whining' about it So, you want to take back those sentence? People should NOT accept BBaby meta, and they should NOT stop complaining about BBaby meta? Then just say that clearly..........

What a load of bullocks, they are even going back on their previous statements regarding sights which change elevation. I remember 100% the reasoning they gave: it gives a free spotter plane ( even though it didn't increase range ofc ).

Well WG needs to work on their communication, since last statement implies no other things are not allowed but I am 100% elevation changes were illegal at the time. Maybe they changed policy, or more probably the statement was a half truth.

I don't think Donskoi is on par with Roon but I grade her higher then Ibuki. ps: find a broadside target ( which isn't shooting back... very important little tidbit there ) and shoot AP.. I had > 10k dmg salvo's on BB's and cruisers.

No no, this was EXPLICITLY forbidden. Any sight mod which changed elevation is not allowed, I was around when this was discussed and I remember this with 100% certainty.

Please no, those usually result in either lemming trains of kemp spawn fests.

Still, if Worchester would be worth the grind I am sure existing players will go back to regrind. I mean heck I believe that with Groz most people just not found the tier X worth the grind. Nothing to do with going back and regrind as a concept, just with the ship at the end of the line. Also, if they do PvE scenarios right I am actually quite sure people will like playing them. Afaik that modern tank game almost runs on PvE scenarios no? It's just that WG will have to 'get it right' from the start, or very close to it or people will not show interest at which time WG would probably claim it a failed experiment and stop development of it.

What? I mean like... WHAT? Now besides RPF we have an actual wall hack and it's allowed And a mod which shows how to dodge shells more easilly... and it's allowed...

Wth... you say: stop whining about BB overpopulation, and NOW you give a reason on how to actually do a LITTLE something about BBaby catering ( you know who BBabies are right.. those who play BBaby boats almost exclusively and who claim 'it's fine' ), in response to a post where I say the game would be better off with a HEALTHY balance ( something WG has confirmed to actually WANT as well )?? Why is it negative if someone says the game would be better if with a healthy class distribution? Why do you post ways to somewhat limit BBaby catering yet find that someone saying game should cater to all classes 'blinkered and negative'? Do you think before posting? ps: there are enough premium CA/CL's, it's just that tier 8 is for most people economically the most attractive and guess what, BB's are overperforming on tier 8 in comparison with other classes, and tier 8 is the highest tier premiums are to be found.... You think people rather play Eugen then easymode Tirpitz or Alabama? pps: I will NEVER -> ​but thanks for confirming your BBaby status mr. 68% BB games

My RU-FU is weak, and google translate is not that trustworthy. But I can ask a RU speaker It does make sense what you're saying, but if you look at concurrent player numbers it's not that far reaching to believe that new player additions are not that high. Edit: btw, maybe more people would replay the line to get Grozovoy if most people not regard it not worth that grind. Now, WG would probably not admit to that either as it's bad pr to have a stagnating player base.

"... and there aren't many new players - " is quite clear on what it means. Namely, there AREN'T MANY NEW PLAYERS playing the already implemented lines. Which is exactly what the posts you quoted thought it meant: there are NOT many new players coming to the game.

Did you consider you may be a compounding factor? If global difference in win rate is 5% and it's higher for you personally, that seems to indicate the exaggerated issue isn't with the mm.

It is quite influential how much support DD's get. Plenty of games where I had DD advantage were lost because of spawn camping 'players', many games where I had the DD disadvantage were won because the team actually focused enemy DD's. The only exception would indeed be in domination, having less DD's there is quite decisively a factor. Also, when MM put's two capping DD's ( low concealment ) into one team and two gunboat DD's with higher concealment into the other team it can really suck. Especially if the team with the capping DD's is semi competent and actually helps their DD's when they spot the enemy gunboat's.

You have 57% win rate, no need to hide those stats Even baddies shouldn't hide them, no one will point and laugh at them ( unless they want to get involved in balance discussions which they always seem to do... ).