mtm78

With the accuracy we have, this would just bring more RNG into the game as hitting a tactically valuable subsystem would consist on 'luck'?

No it's not. Why did I expect this Surely it's DD's which are the problem right

Good let them leave.

Really? So that's what he said huh... pretty strange though as I can't recall this event at all

You are mistakenly taking this thread as 'constructive' when it was just a whine from some baddie.

As long as we have both gunboat and torpedo DD's there is no point in limiting their total to the same amount as BBaby boats. 3 BB - 4 DD rest cruisers + the lonely CV now and then

I think the storage doesn't really matter but it's the gallery plugin WG uses on the front page which resizes the images.

That report option is the best thing WG added to the game since CBT!

Duhhhh Because they are forced to because BBabies don't do their job.

Best and easiest way to limit abuse ^^^

I uploaded a replay once where I was reported and got a chat ban... only because I was disagreeing with someone ( a Chappy iirc ) on which cap would be most optimal. No swearing, no name calling nothing, just: you would have done better in the other cap -> chat ban. And that's exactly the issue. People ABUSE the report option because they know it works. And as long as they abuse it often enough, eventually you will get to a point where you have a 'history' of reports. None of those reports are manually checked though I you report people who call you a potato the problem is not with Corvi but with you. Chat is NOT there to sit around the campfire and sing kumbaya my friend kumbaya.. It's also there to talk about tactics, and what people did wrong. Being called a baddie is what actually made me think: I should perhaps at least try to improve, and guess what: I did. Being called 'bad/potato' is not an insult as it's usually just a fact. Like last game in my Tashkent, I had noobs in BB's, especially our Yama + Curry division being as bad as they can come. So when most BBabies were dead or dying and a Tirpitz started to blame 'our DD's' I called him a bad player. Guess what, top half of our team was filled with DD's and cruisers, and all the BBabies were last. Should I be reported for calling them bad? I guess you think so.. I don't.

Strange, I don't have that bug. And you're still getting a report, for the simple reason I can't tell if you're having 'whatever' issues, or you're doing it on purpose, or you're pressing battle KNOWING your pc loads into battle late every game. If you're late, you get a report. I had mod issues yesterday, couldn't load into battle tried twice then tried in safe mode but that was so late into the game it was basically useless. If I gotten reports for that it would have been 100% right since I should test mods in pve or training room if I'm not sure they work.

Well if critique is what we're doing, I really wanted to be able to enlarge the submissions.. I don't think that's the resolution they were submitted in... and if you REALLY want to judge models you need to actually be able to see the amount of effort put into applying details.

50% BBaby population at tier 8 is cooling down..... ​Again stating the wrong cause and effect... you're hopeless.

If you're 1 minute late with a DD you're getting a bot/afk report period.

Because unlike BBabies,. cruisers don't have the armor to get focused by multiple enemy BB's Blaming cruisers is flamuW, it is the BB overpopulation which made it impossible to be aggressive with cruisers. ​ what do you know about personal stats? And talking about growing brain's, well it would look better if you could actually support that claim with something.. just as the rest of your 'opinion'. Sorry if this sounds harsh but it's getting very tiresome to see statements like these.

Voted! There are some 'interesting' submissions there, but only one...

Yeah sure, those nasty crying DD and cruiser players right 'Even I'... hahaha wew... Btw -> Citation needed! Since this is what you base your whole 'thesis' around. And PLEASE, don't tell me 'it's just my experience' or I will burst out in laughter. The theory is sound, more tight spreads make it easier to dodge those stray shells always being magnetically pulled to your citadel. But it would also mean getting into < 15k where you have mear second to dodge you just die instantly. So how about: no and get off your high horse. Or play some more games, and grind higher tiers.

Tell WG to fix my Type59, I miss that tank... guess everyone can own a Maus now though ^^ this. Though I wouldn't call Belfast OP, I would just call it BROKEN. Remove concealment module or change utility toolbelt so it can't slot smoke + radar just like regular tree.

Tbf the agility buff applied to all classes iirc ( the one which people continously mistake for the 'nerf' to USN 127 and Cleveland shell trajectory ). But yes, lowering agility would make BB's more reliant on their team which is a good thing.

See.... people cry about +-2 because they don't WIN as often as they think they would with +-1..... Guess what whiners, enemy team will also be +-1. +-2 is fine, perfect to teach people how to play a tactical game and not UT'99 on water with ship models.

Actually that would just mean enemy team get's all caps and you lose without having done anything.

S_O is still an employee, and I don't think he has the freedom to post that even IF he actually would like to

I'm out of likes, but just wanted to show this is indeed worthy off a like