mtm78

I killed a Shima last game with Tirpitz AP. Always shoot DD's when spotted a> they are you biggest threat ( unless you're a potato and you're sitting broadside to enemy BB.. and even then German BB's might be better of shooting the DD ) b> you get xp/credits based on percentage of hp you remove from enemy ships so damaging DD is a large increase in gains c> you're removing enemy ability to contest cap points. Having a terrible evening though... the ONE day I have premium because I redeemed PTS rewards and I can't get a win, just can't. Every team I get the team with the #$%#$%#$%#$%$#.

Wiws is a new game I recon Anyway, you're generalizing and when point out you're generalizing you're dismissive. Son I am dissapoint.

They will just use S key to reverse into 'proper sniping BBaby' position. What WG should do is a> allow cruisers to angle more successfully against cruiser caliber shells ( aka reward skill more ) b> increase rewards for tanking damage WITH allies in vicinity ( because otherwise sniping BBaby which get counter sniped might argue they are 'tanking' ) c> increase rewards for BB based on range it which does damage d> remove reverse gear from BB's e> make BB's more reliant on cruisers ( NO more BB's with cruiser utilities like defAA / hydro / radar ) and f> limit BB's to 3 per game. Ok ok, d was a bit of a Rest is dead serious Wrong generalisation, I stopped paying them any money and I am a whiney player who just wants a balanced game for every class

Pandering to BBabies won't work in the long run either. I've stopped paying for premium time and stopped buying new premium ships...

See, it's not profiles which cause ad hominem. It's the people who feel that their profiles are somehow 'wrong'. Since when is 33% more then 62% ​ Basically, everything you say is wrong. Everything That is why a meme would be better fitting for you.

Not as long as I can keep 100% win rate and any capable player can stay above 90% Maybe the new scenarios would be something fun idk.. but those are also quite imba's ( need to kill Izumo in a tier 5 / 6 iirc

I beg to differ. Plenty of people post things which make no sense, until you look at their profile. And it's not ad hominem if it's relevant and based on facts. Ad hominem means attacking someone by discrediting their attacker. Using a profile to point out flaws in someone's ability to reason balance issues is not ad hominem if their profile shows they can't. Avg tier 5.0 Highest tier 8, and with low numbers on those tier 8's. Tell me again how Yamato plays please Your highest tier cruiser is a Pensacola with a 47% win ratio. Tell me more about cruiser dodging Yamato shells please. Your highest tier DD is a Sims, with a 33% win ratio. Tell me more about those non existing gaps, please. You don't have the experience to be able to discuss actual balance overall. Maybe low tier balance, and then only from the viewpoint of a rather bad / mediocre player. You do realize that underperformance doesn't really indicate an understanding of current game mechanics, so how can you expect to be able to actually propose changes to those mechanics which would be better then current? @Tungstoid -> See, no ad hominem, just questions and truth based on his profile. edit: ​ Tell me max concealment from a Yamato

If it's to hard, WG also gave players a game mode where every ship is mirrored

^^ thanks.

That is a false assumption, the fight is fair since the enemy team has roughly the same composition. I'm not a unicum

That is why they should remove it from low tiers ( protected MM ) and just add a protection that new accounts don't face seal clubbers.. Ow wait, we have that but it doesn't really work ( I get plenty of new account against me when I played my new low tier stuff I had to grind ). And after it's removed, we won't get new 'why does tier 5 meets tier 7 omg' threads, as people are used to having to play tactical, supporting the right ships if needed, not making themselves be primary target if they aren't the right ship for that in the lineup.... with other words: learn how to play the game in an environment where NOT every ship is equal.

Yamato 2.0 Sigma.... Mogami 155 has what, 16km range almost... yeah about those memes... Btw maybe someone should tell him torpedoes also have rng in their spread.. eg they go left and right and leave those nice gaps in between After reading that, and the hidden profile, I remember now more clearly why arguing with hidden profiles is mostly redundant. Memes are better.

You can now report them for that using the "interfering with my game" option

Buff to bb only if wg doesn't lower overmatch impact, allowing cruisers to angle with effect against bb's more.

It is simply not possible to use arguments to counter your content because you don't have any. Just blah blah about it being DD which punish team instead of bb, without any actual arguments backing it up.

Always this... always the people who hide their profile use this 'argument' as why they hide them. Yet I seen no one actually being the victim of that with a public profile DUE to the profile. It might be because of what they are saying off course. Yeah, like the team with the most camping BBabies always losing? And this is why you think DD's should be limited....

Remember the 'joke' from April 1st ....

I got ninja'd sorry... Mods will clean them up I hope

Just illustrates how dmg farming doesn't win games which WG tried to emphasize with rewarding things which does win games with xp ( capping ). Or, there were 3 other people who farmed more damage

Don't bother with him, sometimes he's just like that

Krasny Krim

I remember the days when I could play cruisers and angle against BB shells. It was glorious / fun. Though it also meant that the BB's needed proper teamplay, it could punish broadsides but it would struggle with people rushing them to simply torp them. Both things I actually enjoyed in the game. If you do it in this manner then increasing accuracy could be tried in small steps

You said 5 DD's are as bad as 5 BB's just after I posted why that's nonsense -> bashing? Where? Or do you mean that doing balance discussions with a hidden profile is a prudent thing to do? ( sorry if double post, forum didn't allow more quotes in a single post ) ​http://www.twitchmetrics.net/e/91503-flamuw

I play all classes except CV's and I understand basic balance. You on the other hand, display a lack of comprehension. And that is not based on 'opinions', everyone can have an opinion, but on the supplemental reasoning or lack thereof. What you want is Unreal Tournament'99 ( perhaps even GOTY ) on water with ship models. You want this game to be a twitch based shooter. And in wanting to make this a twitch based shooter, you're forgoing on the existing game design, assuming that making the game more twitch based this would decrease the performance gaps between classes. What do you know about those? Are you one? Hit ratio is important if you take into account the playstyle. A lower hit ratio from someone who takes more risky shots can be better then a higher hit ratio from someone who fights at close range ( and does so with less effect/success ). Also, you say 'whole game is RNG'. Usually people say this who think they are better then their stats but they have had 'bad luck'. This is nonsense. Dispersion is the same for everyone over a large enough sample size ( alu hat theories left aside ). The dispersion for BB's is there because this is NOT a twitch based shooter, this is NOT Unreal Tournament Game Off The Year edition. This is a tactical game, with a slower pace of gameplay which does NOT rely on twitch reflexes. Try to turn it into what you're proposing will drive off more people then you realize. And it won't even fix anything, increasing accuracy will just make BB's even more powerful at close range, meaning cruisers have to stay at max range at all times meaning they can't support their DD's meaning BB's will still camp because they don't want to push without cruiser support. Don't tell anyone, but there is a Twitch vod somewhere from a streamer I was in division with, me in a Zao... which is known to be quite accurate, and there was a low hp enemy cruiser who I said I would 'finish off'. It took me minutes to actually sink him, minutes Sure I could blame it on rng, but the fact was that I was just shooting badly and he was evading correctly. Not to mention the times I'm in a VMF DD and wiggling like crazy and actually evasion tanking more damage then I do in my Yamato, you might think that's all luck but I see to many people who never dodge as well. So, are they always more unlucky? Or is there, as with aiming, actual skill involved as well? BB's focus the target on which they can do the most damage, unless there is a target which is actually threatening them. But yes, this is now cruisers since they are squishy and generally closer then the camping BB's. Or the Yamato will delete the Mogami in a single salvo, let the fire burn out and heal it all back? Like they were when CV's were in every game? When we had long range torps on IJN ( not just 20km Shima torps )? When BB's couldn't bow camp snipe from the back because any BB without escort was actually countered by a class which could do that? CVs need to be in every game or almost every game, and they should be able to punish lone BB's hard. DD's should be able to deter BB's to move slowly or sit still. I tried

Increasing BB accuracy is bs it would just make them stronger and that is the LAST thing we need The RNG in BB dispersion AND torpedo dispersion is there for different reasons. The dispersion for BB shells is there because they are to strong otherwise, and the dispersion of the torpedo's is there because enough BBabies cried about torpedo's being 'overpowered'. Yes, and that is good because at short range you're also the most vulnerable. 1) Idgaf. I want a balanced game not catered to BBabies who cry about anything which could potentially be a match for their ships. 2) sadly no argument there Lancasters don't fly off carriers