mtm78

ftfy

Not playing to win but to farm, now that's very 2010 if you ask me.

e-peen? Who the heck cares about who wins more, it's only relevant because it shows how wrong people can be. Someone who lacks the skills to actually play the game and comes to complain about a broken class and has a public profile isn't ridiculed, he is confronted with how it's him who is failing and not the class balance. That it boils down in many cases to 'l2p' or 'gitgud' is NOT the problem of those telling it you know..... Heck in my clan chat every time I complain about something I'm told to git gud ffs Stats are used because facts are more important than emotional impressions. If you're the kind which doesn't like that, you're obviously not a facts kind of guy which is fine with me. You ALWAYS have to analyze stats before saying anything based on them. My seal clubbing is legendary, yet some people still seem to think I'm on ok'ish player. Maybe I am though, my stats are public so when I talk about balance people can see my perspective. There are people who have different opinions because they have different perspectives and that is fine, but actually letting others see that helps a lot in any discussion which is based on fact finding except on emotional references which usually result in chest beating and inability to see other people's point of view.

#AlternateFacts

New player, no experience in WoWs, comes to forum. Opens thread 'Cruiser role in current meta'. Person A is saying: use cover as much as possible, don't mind the BBaby maffia crying about how it's cowardice. Person B is saying: sail close to allied DD's to the closest cap available, don't use priority target it's overrated skill. So how should this new player reflect on these conflicting statements unless they can see person A plays 3 classes and has 60%+ wr, and person B plays one class and has 48% wr? Balance discussions with people with hidden stats are mostly laughable. Exceptions are discussions about preference, which is non factual from the start. But if you want to claim some class as being broken, you better not hide your profile while doing so. edit: Lol... tell that to WG We actually had a forum reputation system, WG stated is was being abused ( and it was, but not to the point it lost it's actual usefulness ) and removed it at the same time as they introduced the +- system in the actual game. Also, a popular opinion might still be factually wrong, forum rep system is still worse than having open discussions. With this statement though I'm pretty sure I'm dealing with an underperforming player as someone who disregards facts in discussions is unlikely to have the ability analyze gameplay situations.

Truth hurts m8, don't take it the wrong way. Saying l2p while having a hidden profile wouldn't be 2010. rather 10.000BC evolution wise Not saying you're actually a baddy who's opinion can safely be ignored, I don't think this is the place to stat bash even if we had access to them, but 'l2p' and 'git gud' comments from anyone without a purple signature aren't as effective. Just letting you know up front

I actually like the new premium IJN DD, might need small buff's to torpedo concealment ( slight ) but it's stealthy, fast enough, agile enough, and even with only 3 Akizuki turrets has enough DPM to not auto lose a DD vs DD fight ( at the VERY least ). The torps are a bit underwhelming but still. The biggest problem is that IJN speciality is not as rewarding ( spotting ) or reliable as always being able to reliably deal direct damage ( like with lower dmg but good concealment torps ).

Nah you couldn't.

Someone post the roadmap he will be very happy to see most boxes been ticked.

And I don't know how to propose a ruleset which would fit every game situation. So, move it to the players. If a target is called out, any damage done to that target for the next 20s is rewarded more. Problem would be everyone would be pinging everyone all the time

Then stop trying to use sense while arguing with someone who only plays BB's ;)

Thinking about what I said, well it is wrong. Dmg can be farmed yes, but not all damage farmed is bad. I'd say that damage done in order to help with the objectives is actually crucial. What I would like is for dmg which is done in support of the team to actually be awarded more. As this is almost impossible to automate with rules as you'd need to many rules to cover all game situations, I'd propose to boost the XP/credits awarded for damage which is done on targets which are called out by others as priority.

You know what takes skill? Your performance in a Kamikaze R! The most easy DD to play and you have around 4 out 10 games won in it? So in a ship which you say you don't need skill, you do so bad it shows you have less skills than required to play a ship which requires no skill?

But it's easier with 3x3 forward facing turrets, you don't have to think about places to turn, gun traverse and silly stuff like that tovarish

Public window licking, some say it's a serious offense, some actually think it's probably just harmless ( / brainless ) behavior....

Yup she is by far easier to do competent in. Which is why I don't understand seeing people with ~50% in her, it's not like Gremmy which while being also broken still required some skill to use. It's my most played ship, but I'm not afraid to admit it's mostly because I played her when I had a bad game or bad batch of games, and you can play Imperator with one hand basically and still do fine. Two hands and a brain... lel.

Ow don't worry, we know.

So wait, people who say the mechanic is stupid are paid by WG? I don't think I ever seen @Exocet6951 say anything to indicate he defends WG with much of anything.... Wait, I'm a 'tester' right, so why is my signature not praising WG's development roadmap? I'm so confused!

Armor is troll, gun's are ok, the thing which makes her to strong for tier 5 max is the turret layout in combination with the armor layout. You always have 9 guns to work with no matter what you do ( unless you're bad and you go brawl with glacial turret traverse ). Most people overestimate the Imperator's ship characteristics imo, I do better with Arkansas and no one recently been calling that to strong ( probably because no one is playing them much ).

Buy a Harekaze, with the 100mm gun's it's a good ship

+10 for not crying cheat or haxorz in tittle. See above for answer why it's indeed possible. http://i.imgur.com/cRdsNHO.mp4 BAH can't embed video's unless it's from YT.... stupid forum template.

Shhhhh come on, public window licking is a serious crime! On a serious note, I think Amon_ITA might be on to something. And honestly, without taking into account players online, MM is fast unless playing on very odd hours and while that isn't as important for the longevity of the game it is important for my enjoyment. I even bought a ship lately.. giving money to WG. Guess they restored some faith lost Not saying there aren't any issues, but since there seem to be people who even LIKE some things I have issues with, I guess that it doesn't really matter if I think things are bad. What matters is how much money is being spent, and since most checkboxes on the BB bingo / development road map have been checked, there isn't much else which can go terribly wrong, like a CV rebalance or putting radar on new BB's.....

Beyond more than just you @Exocet6951

Yup unless you do enough damage to actually kill enough ships to offset the cap disadvantage but this is rare as cap points surprisingly enough ramp up quite hard... Maybe it should be even faster just to ensure people actually are forced to contest the cap zone's ( more 'structures' play -> more teamwork -> less 'farming is also good yo' opportunity to argue to their point )?