mtm78
-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Everything posted by mtm78
-
Lagging when viewing smoke - which settings address this?
mtm78 replied to BruceForce's topic in General Discussion
Try lowering post-processing? Running to high anti aliasing? Animate small objects -> turning this off can give a performance boost ( but it will limit what you see, plane squad's for instance will be shown as a single plane no matter how many planes are in it ). There used to be a nice guide for the settings, which did what and which you could use to tweak performance. -
Japanese cruiser torpedoes - Dire need of rebalance.
mtm78 replied to Kazomir's topic in General Discussion
Wait.. another special snowflake who thinks DD's / torpedoes are unrealistic, but forget to complain about his BBaby class hit ratio which is tenfold or more then what it should be.. Gawd, it's weekend isn't it? -
I think it's time we start a GoFundMe to buy WG EU a brain...
mtm78 replied to Zogash85's topic in General Discussion
But guys, WG is just spoiling us!! -
If it attracts players why not? If it's not damaging to the game like the opinions of those people playing just one class which shall not be named, I don't see any harm in it.
-
Notice this thread covers a bugfix, why is it still a relevant thread with current patch then?
-
Sadly that condensed version is basically everything you would hear for those 2 years. ps some forum profiles are unable to jank my chain, others on the other hand....
-
If this thread doesn't deserve real likes I don't know which would. This forum template is still hidious imo, but the most annoying are those announcements and turning them off was the best thing WG did in quite some time forum wise ( after getting S_O to post on EU forum and engage in Q&A as much as possible ). So when I saw them back I thought I was seeing things wrong, I wasn't logged in properly, I missed a setting in my control panel or something... then I saw the thread and finally realized it wasn't just me
-
You got to ask yourself, do you feel Overconfident™ enough?
-
Makes you wonder why WG tried to hide from us doesn't it... Anyway, I'm reacting to posts which is like... not trolling. Trolling is actually engaging the discussions ( so yeah, that says a lot how I think about the people I sometimes react to ).
-
You're behind on facts, last iteration actually BUFFED the secondary range on German BB's Still lost some HE dmg and fire chance iirc though :) edit: damn, well screenshot say more, nice ninja :D
-
You would have gotten a sincere like my dear sir <3 The comment wasn't about OP, it was a different thread with a user which posts has now gone invisible. Guess mod's canned the message just when I tried to 'like' it.
-
Edited
-
Thread about balance... +
-
Even so, it doesn't change the fact that enticing the selfish non *Edited as much as possible to play for the objectives is a good concept not a bad one. Dismissing it because the actual *Edited not suddenly getting working brain cells is like saying you won't impose a speed limit because some people will still drive to fast ( well, for argument's sake it's pretty close no? ).
-
Sense, I found none. Guess it's a 404.
-
WG themselves actually enjoy and are proud of their models, if there are errors in them they like them to be pointed out. Sure, I rather have new game modes or the new command menu, but correct models is also something which attracts quite some players.
-
Well with that I would contact a CM and ask him to forward it to make sure it's read by the right people ( or post in a Q&A thread and hope it get's answered ). Certainly with existing configurations it should be easy to pinpoint mistakes and hopefully fix them.
-
No I was just wondering if it had any use to post actual photo's or schematics, but as the hull's are fictional that would be hard ;) I mean if they are not fictional hulls, and if the AAA emplacement isn't fictional, then pictures of the ship class in real life should make it easier for WG to see what they did wrong or how it should be. But I assumed fictional due to your first example, it seems pretty obvious that range finder obscurs a lot from the bridge ( or well the part of the tower which has actual windows and to me looks like a bridge instead of an observation deck like that above it ). I just assumed that wouldn't be a real ship design ( unless the perspective is misleading ).
-
No it wouldn't, but not everyone playing selfish is in every case also an idiot. So by making sure the selfish people actually play for objectives more with economic incentives to do so is a good concept not a bad one.
-
All the hull's you've identified are fictional upgrades right?
-
Because he plays only BB's.
-
Anyone else sick of IJN DD getting Nerfed
mtm78 replied to runawayfast's topic in General Discussion
.5 SkyBucks at the most imo. Anyway, he isn't getting a naval simulator from WG, I don't see the point in complaining about 'realism' only in favor of his beloved battleships. It's not like we ever see him post '30% hit ratio for a battleship should be impossible, in real life they had 3% at most!'. Which is quite telling. -
Anyone else sick of IJN DD getting Nerfed
mtm78 replied to runawayfast's topic in General Discussion
Haha I am mr. DD EasyMode but I can't actually play them myself so I guess I don't have enough skill to play the ships which should require the least skill according to me hahaha Then I will tell them to read irrelevant stuff about real life and try to convince them it's how the game should be as well! Maybe I can turn this arcade approximation of naval battles into a proper Greek_Patriot™ Naval Simulator ( patent pending ). ...... See how much value you just added to the forum? -
Is this possible? Landear did not sunk with 7 torpedos
mtm78 replied to Luis_Veloso's topic in General Discussion
I concur, Kamikaze R is the best torpedo boat tier for tier imo. So if it's so easy, who are you so bad in it? Don't you have enough skill to play the ships which need the least ( according to you )? -
You're such a special one aren't you? I know more testers who've quit or been kicked off forum because they didn't 'defend WG' enough But hey if you don't have any actual arguments I guess those comments is all we're going to see from you.
