mtm78

Ghee thanks

If you think the topic isn't covered after that informative post mentioning the EU sale price, if you think MK needs discussions in any way shape or form, why did you just only tried to get some attention with a big bold font? Seriously, if your intent is to have a factual discussion about the do's and don't of MK play, or where the value of an MK in any competitive game mode comes from, or why the ship is 'fun' in randoms or anything like that which would add to the topic instead of just coming in, pointing to the floor and screaming it's not properly cleaned before running out again.

Yorck is playable, I mostly long range HE spammed with it since BB meta, and when ambushing stuff using terrain, if getting such a juicy broadside at close range, 210mm AP isn't to shabby either. Late game, for it's tier, a Yorck is actually not as squishy as others ( Shchors for instance ). We don't need more gimmicks, if anything the developers should start thinking on how they distribute those gimmicks ( stahp giving them to damage sponges aka babyboats ). Hipper is not living up to it's fame, it's quite grindy. Roon though, Roon is a good ship. Maybe peculiar with the turret layout but that's not new on GE line. Hindenburg imo is a beast. Sure it's huge, but it's also durable for a cruiser ( haven't played Moskva yet much, the other cruiser which is referred as a BB sometimes.. but I been straight up deleted in Moskva multiple times and that almost never happens in Hindenburg unless I know I'm taking a huge risk ).

The problem with this is that the repeat rate is too high, and I actually think there are people involved who want the best for the game in every way ( as their careers and the game are intertwined at least right now :D ) and not noticing a mistake as many times as it's been made ( if it's stupidity and nothing else ) is borderline malpractice ( can't think of a better fitting term, don't think it's 100% applicable though ). So I still think there is a reason WG thinks the current missions are fine, which must correlate to seeing growth numbers in line with what they predicted ( or something like that.... idk doesn't it make some sense?? ).

Well if people really wonder if MK is good, they should watch some of the competitive tier 8 games, or go watch some streamers talk about the *cough* benefit *cough* of 203mm HE compared with 15xmm after the introduction of IFHE. Then, it has range and it has smoke and insane AAA. Ofc, there will be a time when MK is meh.. yesterdays news caught up by new introductions using the patented PowerCreep™ methods. but that is probably quite a fair bit away.

The highest, better get some cream before buying! Remember, wholesale prices if you buy in bulk.

Buddy you still there? I just don't know, it seems like you're trying to speak

Yup, time to change it up and get cracking

Maybe the question should be: how sure are you it's only 0.1%? A-b-c are a 1-2-3 so if you'd ask me I'd let them be. Leaving us with another A-B-C A - WG doesn't want players to feel challenged in a way they can archieve, it's part of their World Domination scheme, luring people in feeling like what they do has no influence on anything anyway so why bother B - WG's grand World Domination scheme relies on the anger of people having unobtainable goals in life C - World Domination relies on people being apathetic No marketing department would keep doing something which they know to be bad for the game and WG as much we like to poke the bear ( ) is actually pretty good at marketing. So, they must see something we don't. Maybe we should ask them after the event if they are willing to convince us the mission design is solid and thus the complaints from people who fear they might be hurting the game they play and would like to be playing in quite some time perhaps, are in vain. Like: show increase in activity which can be directly linked to the event on all servers, and see if the regions with easier to obtain goals have a more noticeable increase in player activity ( which is the goal of these events right ?? ). If that would be true, maybe WG EU doesn't want it's player base to grow, or their prediction models might indicate the current player count is actually what they were aiming for? Idk, there must be some explanation other than: WG is stupid. Because as much as I don't agree with certain gameplay/balance directions, I do not think WG is stupid. They can be very resilient in making the same mistakes more than once though ( big organization also means slower reaction times... look at #FochGate ). But somehow, despite many critics, they have a game which is doing better than WoWp while imo the attraction to flying and airplanes in many people is probably bigger than the attraction to naval warfare. So yeah WG, why do you bother with these missions?

If you don't remember the forum outrage of the 'silent nerf' to USN 127 and 155mm shells flight characteristics....... then the buff preceded your presence. All ships got manoeuvrability buff, wasn't a ship or even class limited change, which made the rainbow arc USN shell's feel like they were nerved ( as they were the hardest to hit with ).

Meh if you have a slow turret traverse BB and he is facing wrong way it's ok to pop out from the island and take some pot shots. Ofc, you shouldn't do this when the Montana is actually looking your way, just because you're greedy and you want to get the kill shot on that PRAVDA Generalsomethingsomethingsumting.....

Hey you're both alien to me, humans and woman so don't go accusing me of putting in some divider there I think we should blame evolution for making it two very distinct species I just bought myself a Minn Kota endurance 30 and an inflatable Intex boat... but I own no fishing rods yet .....

I found it a long time ago as is, didn't change anything myself. And tbh, looking at the language, it's pretty fitting for Brit's vs other English speaking people more so than women and humans.

I gave your post a like in the other topic, it's a good writeup.

I just <3 the British way of saying stuff...

Jezus, I stocked up last week guys hoping this would happen. I'm selling them at a cheap prize guys and guys, get them in bulk for an even better price ->

Probably those bombs end up killing cruisers in one drop and being harmless against BB's, you know, for balance tovarish!

I don't like playing CV's but yeah those AP bombs look nice Regular line get's stronger bombs then E though iirc ( afaik )?

Let's just hope we all have our economies booming soon again, make EU + GB great again Anyway, cheapest bundle is €26,40, not bad if you don't have it yet.

This is the EU forum, stahp using pounds we don't use that here

Premium account doesn't influence base XP. That is why they call it BASE xp, everything else is compounded on it.

Only to BB's, the direct damage is what killed many of my DD's being cornered by a hydro running untouchable German BB.

Well if this is still that old bug, my hopes of it being fixed properly just took a nosedive :)

Hasn't WG been spoiling us forever Anyway, I'm not playing reguraly enough to get really worked up atm about missions, but this difference between NA and EU in requirements and rewards is .... quite steep. Still, WG is free to have different marketing for different regions, that I can understand. Just don't make it so bloody obvious WG EU is always the one spoiling their playerbase the most.