mtm78

You're using the wrong hull.

I kind of think they DO care about their wallet, and let's be honest if you work at WG these games should be something you 'care' for as they pay your bills. Let's just hope they are also aware enough of the perception of development so far by at least a small part of their community ( which isn't 100% happy ).

The people who are indicating an issue with BB AP are far from the kind of people who cry their favourite ( or only ) class is not 'stronk' enough.

Why do people keep acting like I am the one who made that chart, I might have spammed it a lot but it came from the Murica forums It's to outdated anyway, it's best to preserve it in its current form as to indicate how the development of WoWs has looked like so far ;) If people choose to be offended by my posts, there is nothing I can do to help them with that issue.

I fixed the image posted earlier....

Posts in off-topic and fan recruitment area don't count towards your total post count ( or they shouldn't ), so the window licking and waifu's should make a small fraction of my spam. And my pony stuff I only share with @havaduck ...

How about WG makes me forum admin when I reach 20k

https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/dev/render/cycles/gpu_rendering.html That is assuming your ui was laggy because your cpu can't handle it. Anyway, sorry for taking the topic off track :)

I was posting on my tablet, I was trying to edit as the post I wanted to make was a lot longer but I lost my connection. You're right in that what we SHOULD actually be doing is asking WG to clarify in detail how the penetration and damage mechanics should work. I know shells can ricochet inside a ship due to different armor layers, but I'm not 100% sure on how the damage should be counted then. This mechanic of shells bouncing of internal armor layers is also not in the wiki so I can't look it up. I know there are posts about it somewhere, but even if you go look up all the info you can find, that info will be from different patches and we wouldn't be sure if there been changes in the meantime. Patchnotes only contain info which WG thinks is useful for us ( and tbh, with the amount of actual changes it's not that strange to not list everything ). If there is a change which only influences server behavior and it doesn't make it into the patch notes ( or it makes it in but in a form which is hard to interpret correctly ) the only info you can get on it is from the forum ( and other fora and social media ) which discuss the game. WG has said the numbers don't look off but they will look closer at the issue ( mostly how shells can get 'odd' damage numbers which don't fit the damages which could be expected ). When they come back to this I do expect them also come with a more detailed explanation of the mechanics at play.

because it's not ready to be tested by mere mortals, we might actually have fun getting Kraken's and turning our Yamato's into RN BB's with superheal, as well as getting a dpm which some cruisers wouldn't mind having ( meh maybe not exactly as I am to lazy to actually check the numbers but still.... ).

He survives a lot of games in his Kagero you see, even when facing a Shimakaze. That proofs battleship AP is fine. Ok, to get it back on topic -> there is a long thread with evidence on how BB AP is impacting destroyer survivability, there is a reason people don't switch to HE for DD's and it's perfectly visible there. Even if a single person would be able to 'never get hit unless it is their own fault', that wouldn't offset the evidence posted there. And it's not just in tier 8+, when I take out my Arizona there is never HE going to be loaded for anything unless I'm sure I will need it and there are no other targets which could possible show up within the time it takes me to complete the HE switch, fire my salvo and go back to AP. Sure maybe not the best example due to the slightly better accuracy than other 12 gunned battleships at the tier, but getting a devastating strike on a DD with AP isn't uncommon on those tiers either ( even if the chances are lower due to generally smaller DD's and BB with worse dispersion ).

Lag during what stage? Did you set it up to use hardware acceleration?

I concur You can all start calling me Lord ( Snow)...

From what I hear it is playable but they had to make some many small sacrifices to reality to fit in all the classes it turned out more arcade then Wows. But hey, it has subs right so must be triple A tittle

potential damage of a Shima you utter pathetic BBABY... Arguing BB ap is fine vs dd when there is ample evidence it is not fine.

To many Freedom Burgers

I might have mistaken you for someone else I know sorry I don't read German btw sorry, and to make claims about you teaching me to play DD's -> 'private profile' -> LOL. The private profile fits the opinion on DD's only getting to much BB AP damage when it's the players fault, it fits it very well.

Social skills suck, they should have never been invented.

We are talking about PEN DAMAGE. To test PENETRATION DAMAGE you need to test PENETRATION DAMAGE. Not complain about 'yeah but you might not hit it if it.....' because it's 100% irrelevant to what is being tested. And yeah, 50mm armor plating helps in arming the BB shells. I would test with Gearing which is not as armored but also fat and known to take full pen damage.

You could win a Bismarck with some campaign, even 'six year old kids' could be sailing one. Heck, even without the campaign, with the amount of sub 40% 'players' on tier X I'd say you're happy not seeing more stuff which makes you want to throw up in disgust. Though, to make the normal even worse, it's even summer holiday ;)

How many DD games have you played ffs, you're not making sense at all. Mhm, so above we have someone with no experience, and here we have someone who is not a very good player. Both reasons why their 'opinions' aren't really worth much. Overconfidence™, don't be the victim of it, stay scared of those BB AP shells!

Lmao. So we should stop complaining about battleship AP wrecking destroyers... because large things tend to damage objects they hit which is friggin totally unrelated to the ffin game but because some BBaby meta lover thinks it's 'logical' it precedes class balance....... Yeah how about

Thanks for the info, I hope I can work with it. If it's to noisy for me even after trying to quiet it enough for a 'daily driver' I might just keep my Minn Kota as well, certainly alone I can take both engines and just switch which on I'll use at the spot.

Is it wrong if I say this sounds vaguely familiar... and appropriate

If you had to look up Maja, you're more in line for paint 3d or something probably If you want something free, look at Blender. It's not easy though ;)