mtm78

Strike? More like a homerun

Yeah yeah just like ur a top 200 guy right

T4 is seal clubbing, my Imperator would not like me to lie about that. Tier 6-8 are not seal clubbing. Tier X less forgiving might be true relatively speaking, in fact I actually said this myself. But that is mechanics, dpm / range / dispersion. Not player skills which make the difference. There are just as many tomatoes on tier X as anywhere else, WG has even made that more likely by selling premium cammo's so they can fail on tier X without having to play lower tier premiums. Offering personal anecdotes as evidence... well at least your profile is public right :D

Brilliant, acting like tier X is the only 'skilled' tier out there. There are MANY players who don't like tier X gameplay and who will kick your behinds if you 'come down' to the tiers they play. You aren't that good mate, stop trying to act tough on the internet it's not working.

I just woke up ( it's holiday, kids are at their mom's so I got nothing really to make me get up in time to be a normal human being. ). I need caffeine ;) They use WG API, maplesyrop afaik crawls accounts?

It is the exact same data, I just highlighted the wrong column due to formatting screwing me over and me not thinking straight. There are too many tomatoes to make even OP ships perform like that.

Ahh I highlighted the wrong column guys, that's NOT win rate will edit post

No, Kaga 76.96 Saipan 73.97 Belfast 71.16 Yes, all 3 premiums with a +70% win rate :D

Player Average for Ships [ at 2017/08/19 ] nation class tier name players total battles average of rates battles win draw lose exp damage caused warship destroyed aircraft destoryed base capture base defense survived kill / death agro damage spot damage hit ratio US CV 7 Saipan 237 17532 73.97 62.10 0.12 37.78 1588 56933 1.16 27.77 0.00 0.00 78.41 5.37 146817 55974 0.00 JP CV 7 Kaga 266 20471 76.96 59.34 0.23 40.43 1395 69239 1.42 16.33 0.00 0.00 70.11 4.75 166090 48624 0.00 RN CA 7 Belfast 1330 94647 71.16 56.96 0.11 42.93 1441 48832 1.01 1.61 0.00 0.00 39.69 1.67 582598 10815 34.20 edit: forum still doesn't keep layout intact sadly, I underlined win rate for the ships, Kaga is leading the pack than Saipan than Belfast. Kaga is way to new to be pulled I feel, and Saipan can disengage fighter. Also, I wouldn't be suprised we get another USN premium carrier someday. edit2: underlined proper column

Can we use http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/index.html? edit: stahp being a ninja

I would not use warships.today if you can avoid it, I don't 100% trust their numbers ever since they been glitching after the IJN line split ( before never any issues ).

Can someone record an AP drop and post it, I seen people stream GZ before but not sure if this was in final config?

He answered you before you even asked

I found this already -> Anyway, clicking on the Twitter account shows a post without mention of a 3rd ship which overperforms and will be banned. Not that I don't believe you guys, all 3 ships I see being mentioned are excellent candidates, though my bet is on one of the CV's.

I read part of the thread, it was started by a ST from NA? Missed that post. Typical WG though, announcing stuff like that on Reddit before own forums

Ow but I will. In fact I already do.

Why the HECK is a SUPERTESTER posting on Reddit on ship removal's?? I read 'mentions of specific mechanic' and thought it was an official announcement but it's just a supertester breaking his NDA?

Radar Edin is super rare though, so in fact the only real radar ships are second and third from bottom. Which only emphasizes your point, it's not radar as a mechanic which is the issue. Also, you can't really judge the mechanic based on average stats, the times I see radar ships sit at max range not even near caps to actually make use of their radar disqualifies using average performance, I rather just use gameplay examples from how it should actually work. And even then, just as you say, radar isn't broken as a mechanic ( even if it would be nice if you could break detection using islands / solid objects ). Radar actually should work as a catalyst for teamwork both in benefiting from it and countering it through focus. Radar as a concept is good. Putting radar on a destroyer which is also by far the best gunboat at it's tier is arguably.... questionable.

55% you're an average forumite 49% might very well be the avg win rate of all accounts.

Being Dutch I expected you to be not so narrow minded Guess that's what happens when you're from 010 and not around 020, no pride ( parade ).

^^ Radar is a pain in the but, but you need it ( unless smoke is nerved really hard anyway even for small guns and not just the babies ). MM sometimes dumping 4 random belfast in one team and 2 Yorck a Schors and a Fiji on the other, that is more of an balance issue WG should be able to solve.

You do realize you can actually filter on solo and division play? You also have 5k games, want to know how many games I played in CBT? 11xx ( you can see them in my profile, I forgot exact number but eleven hundred something something. With my current that's 6k games. I wouldn't really call you inexperienced, certainly not considering how much this game is NOT the same game as it was earlier. Meta shifts constantly with each patch, more so with bigger one's like stealth fire removal. Statistics are quite nice to track progress, and WG thank god has given us ample tools to do so. Local WG profile pages might not show it all as well, but use a good 3rd part one like warships.today or wows-numbers.

I had a brainfart I think as I read the original quote wrong. Sorry for the confusion, yeah the big guns are now more accurate. 1.8 would likely still be enough with 4 more gun's though.

Sigma going from 2.0 to 1.8 is a nerf in dispersion grouping not a buff.

Small sample size ;)