mtm78

But tovarish, average player has same amount of brain cells as amouba, true story WG told me themselves. They can't handle such complex mechanics comrade, we rather give them AP which detonates in DD's as well.

I would trade having the old AAA effectivness back in exchange for the consumable which doesn't really do much more then cause squads to not drop straight... it will NEVER kill as many planes in a game now as it could during CBT :(

I should think before I write Let's lower CV damage -> BB lives longer. Even WG has said BB's are a problem, they live to long and do to much damage. So how about hell no. <angry martian mode> BB mafia crying to buff AAA isn't the problem, it's the 'developers' actually listening to the crybaby battleship players. Remove BBaby AAA, remove BBaby hydro, remove BBaby radar, remove BBaby better stealth as my ffin cruisers or gtfo. Make BBaby actually need to ask diapers from cruisers and not from WG. That way they might actually stop playing like amoeba's which rather sit in the back letting their team die than do their frecking job. </angry martian mode> Battleships are to independent, even while they still can't sail totally alone and not be instantly deleted they been given to many tools/buffs which imply they should be capable of playing solo to new players. CBT and earlier players remember how battleship was powerful but dependent on their team to survive and how this made more teamplay oriented gameplay. New players see a BB, see it has more AAA as a cruiser and thinks battleships should be able to deal with planes on their own. New player sees a BB with hydro, assumes battleships should be capable of dealing with destroyers without breaking a sweat. New player sees battleships with better concealment as cruisers, and looks at the other stats and naturally assumes that anyone not playing one of those stealthy battleships must be crazy.

= <3 I don't play her so much though atm, but if people want to go go club on tier 4 I rather take her now as Imperator. Usually the others are in Imperators and having defensive AAA from Yubari helps with clubbing CV playing seal clubbers.

I remember taking out MK and shooting at a NCal for 5 minutes. I did 5k damage, and RNG said no fires, with hundreds of shatters. Sure, couple of fires and whole impact goes other way around though. That is what IFHE 'fixed', no longer being reliant on fires. But, DPM only, with literally NO chance of additional fires, is a big baby buff. They should rather as making it a fixed -8%, make it -80% or your base fire chance ( or -70%, since +30% pen.. idk just arbitrary numbers which can be tweaked ). That way you will always have a remaining chance to deal DoT, no matter the base fire chance, and it would be a lot more FAIR for all ships affected. Now you might have ships with insane base fire chance which still remain viable for DoT due to remaining percentage, but something which started low might end up with a negative value ( Duca ). It's nonsensical. Then again, that's starting to make a lot of sense.

Len's turret angle's aren't that great, it's a good fight ofc but I feel I can beat Leni's using Blys unless enemy captain is just a better player as me.

Can't hurt to do it a couple of times though, just in case a WG screwup might actually be beneficial for EU players for a change

Same thing was said about Kaga though As a non-cv player I find it hard to comment on expected performance or specifics about certain carriers. But also, what I said didn't imply it's not trash. Just that this final config was afaik never shown on streams.

Yeah ok then.. leave it be at 7, buff other tier 7's to almost same level. I say ALMOST, because if you keep her you need to drop the tier 8 concealment module. Only than it could EVER be considered balanced ( and it still wouldn't really, due to smoke + hydro + radar toolbelt ).

Buff BB survivability even more be destroying their counter edit: OFC you're a BB main as well no comment would have been better.

Yes, this delay was never shown on streams afaik, just as the sigma change announced from 2.0 to 1.8 on the small gun Megazao.

I was still keeping up my avg damage and win rate when I played her after though, she is an awesome gun platform and can stealth torp with decent torps. And it has decent stealth for a gunboat of her effectiveness. Stealth fire might have been a nice addition to her tools but she isn't exactly 'weak' now either. The only thing which can really hurt you are Russian cruisers due to rail gun's and a Kiev for instance, I don't fear much else.

I'm more of the old gods of the forest

I'm awesome, it's just how I was born?

You are a 47% player with average tier off 5 ( which is fine btw ), explain to me how you think you can judge a ship based on buying it and playing three games in it, at a tier you normally not play, with tools like radar and smoke you do not know ( you don't play DD's.. well 45 games but still ) and you don't have any regular ship with radar. The fact that you're doing almost the same damage in a Belfast as in your Myoko is actually testament for how broken she is, being so different as anything you ever touched before and you're still doing the same damage as your highest win rate same tier cruiser. Also, strange that you claim you have 11 loses in a row when you have 3 battles in total in her. Did you just buy her because you think she might be removed, and now you want her to not be nerved?

I don't think it's a surprise to anyone I'm not liking this whole 'treat your players as being unable to properly select ammo during a game' approach with these dive bombers and upcomming different torpedo options ( it that even makes it through testing ). The whole game is going downhill if you ask me.

Kaga's drop pattern is easier to evade. ps: edit your opening post, being mad isn't worth getting forum infractions for ( don't use red text, WG staff / mods only )

The problem was that 3 squads and drop pattern ment it was to easy to deal with destroyers, you'd need to lower damage a lot of you want destroyers to survive a good cross drop... Not being a CV player myself I'd still recon 2-1-2 would be more fun and would be easier to balance ( even if it's not 'special' like having 3 DB's which either score jackpot or do jack all, and you have to choose your ammo BEFORE the battle starts -> WG logic --> you players are stupid and can't handle choosing ammo in game ).

If you haven't changed settings but have fps drops due to the patch, you should file a bug report. If you want to tweak your settings as to prevent slowdowns in frantic situations -> Effect's and post processing. Especially effects, post processing should actually be almost free but somehow my system doesn't like it. Having effects maxed out I get slowdowns when lots of ships are shooting/being hit/burning/sinking/exploding/torpedo's in the water/planes in the air. Lowering it one setting removes all slowdowns for me, while leaving all other settings on the exact same. I run +-60fps on i7 3770 with hd7850 2gb, and that one settings causes my fps to drop to mid 20's when maxed out ( in certain situations only, but those will get me killed if I get in them and I suddenly can't properly aim due to fps drops ).

Dido with USN smoke plox Ow wait, wouldn't that be kind of a Flint edit: btw if it turns out to be Belfast I will be seriously rolling on the floor laughing my guts out. First -> Belfast is fine, toolbelt is perfectly balanced for tier 7... all the way to finally: We're pulling her from the store. Just like BB AP on destroyers, from fine to 'high priority' issue. But my bet would be Saipan as OP(a)Fast is getting 'indirectly nerved/rebalanced' by smoke + ifhe changes... it's just that I never specced my captain for IFHE and have high 60's win rate nonetheless.

Must be a meta difference where Maas is just more effective due to it.

Impossible to claim this without actually playing solo and doing it on your own No no, don't come to me with damage done and kills and cap points showing you're doing your part, we want solo win rate. Until than, you can play with _FTD_

I'm actually more surprised Blys isn't higher on that list.

I can see where you're coming from Just for me it's different I guess, I been seeing and pointing out this BBaby catering for LONG time. But first I'm a nutjob, there is nothing wrong with class distribution. Then I'm 'annoying' because I keep pointing it out when in fact there really was no issue at all. And now we're long past that, they finally admitted I was ffin right all along, but they don't do jack all to fix it. Shima 20km torpedo soup? -> balance department is on it BBaby INFESTATION -> no no not an issue... ( 1y later ... ) yeah yeah ok it is a slight issue and we're working on it. 1 1/2 year later -> we're working on deep water torpedoes, you might see them next year.

^^^ please someone post a clip of the DB drop.