mtm78

No. ^^ Cammo's work by breaking contour lines. Symmetric camo doesn't work as well

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3946577-Hosseinzadeh-Klein-ruling.html That DCMA would have failed.

They don't seem very talkative though. In fact they just said: screw you, we noticed the thread we won't comment on it though just let you know that we appreciate the feedback, please let us continue to ignore it. edit: seriously I feel this will just be wiped under the carpet, or ofc just attempted to do so.

Looking at the performance / statistics, not really. Damage is underwhelming and fighters are from what I'm told to weak to have an impact. Strange seeing this btw, that WG pulls a KA back but thinks Enterprise with 11% higher wr as next runner up is perfectly balanced. ( edit: also Lexi really needs love it seems ) Or did you mean if they can 'play' it? Yeah ofc they can, ship is finished. Just the testing wasn't really finished it seems.

Ahh thanks didn't even know that. Nice to be able to put another face to one of the names :)

Yeah I meant of the guys being interviewed, idk left one is probably a German community manager?

Left one is ev1n, right one is Tuccy.

Stay tuned for another episode of ...

Are you drunk by any chance? I know it's early but I think Greece might have different customs. Belfast sold well before IFHE, and unless you're a complete *disabled person* it was broken before IFHE. You keep crying about 'you tester people' but you fail to actually look at evidence, you rather repeat your emotional stance on balance. You even disregard me actually owning many of these 'stronk' premiums myself. Can't actually see a problem it seems when Belfast win's 5% more battles as next runner up, perfectly ok for you? And that's AVERAGE. Meaning every potato which ever bought one is counted for that number, and trust me there are MANY MORE of those around as players like Quetak. Idk man, it doesn't seem healthy. Still even compared to OPFast average you have a very impressive win ratio. I expect a lot of divisioning, but heck I seen someone with a solo win rate on Belfast of around 75% I think so it's still possible. Also, Belfast is easy to get above normal results in, but to get the most you do actually need to plan ahead, know the maps and read the battles very well to adapt when needed. But if you can do that the ship is just broken with tier 8 concealment module + radar + smoke + hydro, even without heal and torps. Exactly. @Demencius having an opinion about something isn't an issue. But having an opinion and getting mad when you're told you're wrong, that is a problem.

No you didn't. You bought Belfast, IFHE is a captain skill / game mechanic. Also read my edit :) edit: 1. with close to 80% win rate you're actually one of the top players. 2. you're right, toolbelt is what wins games, I just wish I was as good at it as you ;)

Ikr.. *sadface* As above, you're wasting you're time. If you got nothing better to do be my guest, just make sure you don't expect it to have any impact.

1, That is evidence, you're the only one spewing nonsense. 2. Is there even an argument in that pile off rubbish you deem worthy of a bullet point? You trying to claim you're ENTITLED to thinking non ifhe Belfast is crap because you own one, and to share that without being called out on it? With evidence even? 3. We get that you like it as it is Totally balanced Comrade, nothing wrong with those numbers at all And it's not like this wasn't clear when you read the actual traits of the ship, and IFHE is NOT why Belfast is indeed broken, and makes people win games they should have lost. WG is against P2W, so they say, so I'd say you're arguing in a quite strange way. They need P2W ships in order to sell them? When they know this is actually bad for the game as people should be grinding lines and unlocking good silver ships instead of buying premiums and having the best ship available to them. Yes, you can even accuse me of this, look at my most played ship list. It contains a LOT of those premiums. I am not biased against P2W because I can't buy them, I am against overperforming premiums because I know they hurt the game.

I like the idea and applaud the effort, I just fear it's wasted. WG doesn't want 'blinking ships'. They feel battleship players should have ample time to aim and shoot at any other target, even when they are the only one's with actual meaningful armor, hp, and heal ( ofc this not the official public reason but I can't think of any other which applies ). 5 seconds might be to low though, 10s for DD's 15 for cruisers 30 for battleships sounds more fair. You can't have have 5s restealth on a DD with 5s reload, it would be an incredible buff to destroyers and franky it's not gunboats which are in need of buffs.

And yet, Sub_Octavian says players are unable to actively switch during a game between different ammo types.... so it's not like they have high expectations of players.

You can keep repeating nonsense but it doesn't become true just because you say so Nah, I don't see everyone crying about them, just you ( and some other individuals ). You're allowed to make one as well, try it out for a change you might like it. Your constant crying about non ifhe Belfast being crap might make people consider to not buy one Perhaps the problem here isn't with non IFHE Belfast being useless, or divisions being unfair. Now how about that quid pro quo?

I'm tempted to post some discord 'discussions' but I'll refrain since this is a gaming website. Also, and I can't say this from every CM I seen so far, she actually follows up when she says she does, and this is not something which has always happened. There are still Q&A and specific questions addressed to some people which are months old and which have not been replied to even when it was said it would be. edit: actually this was 'fixed' during my 3 week break, sorry CM's you did actually respond to month old questions and promises on follow ups Sadly, CM is 'just' pass through between community and developers, and I don't actually think we need to convince CM's.

Tbf I'm quite sure the rest is out off office ( not taking away and of your 'Edited' Kandly having some communication is always better as none.. well most of the time :) ). This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.

My attitude? Have you ever looked in a mirror? Keep crying about divisions being unfair to you, and how Belfast needs IFHE. Accuse others of not looking at the facts. Please do, it's making this day very entertaining.

Did they drop you on your head often? *edited* non ifhe 14p captain Belfast... so broken, impossible to play uhuhuh yea must have IFHE huh huh

Has he once actually not tried to do so? I mean his whole argument resolves around his 'opinion' and nothing is brought forth to validate it. Instead, if you don't agree, it's obviously because you get carried in divisions Ow, and 44% 1400 battle rank 1 is because of skill, and if you don't agree you're just biased. But I'm happy to return to topic: divisions are fine, find some friends and stop crying. MM should balance ships better, depending on roles in game not classes. There, topic ended. Now let's get back to him explaining to me how ranked battles work and how SBMM based on rank would be better than current MM, and how in general if I don't agree with him am getting carried in divisions :)

2.5k solo battles with almost 60% win rate. I'm not a baddie. How about equal terms, you been bashing my profile ( well attempting to at least, idk why you actually brought up divisions when my profile is public ) how about you share yours? Quid pro quo?

Lol I never specced IFHE in my Belfast.... Yeah such a terrible ship without IFHE right Ow my average damage in non IFHE Belfast is shy of 60k, and I only win 64% of my battles so I'm obviously doing it wrong.

Even iShill this time isn't defending WG I suppose Good video btw, highly recommended!

Dunning-Kruger seems to have caused permanent damage here. I don't play ranked because I don't want to end up with people like you in my team of seven on who I have to rely. It's bad enough in randoms with all the incredibly stupid incompetent players.

No he was just spamming battle button and eventually got carried His random battle win rate is in line with his ranked 'performance' or lack off... ow wait, that's off course because evil divisions and how MM is unfair and he's actually a great player? Common knowledge I was testing at the time of implementation. And I did not say anything about if I agree or not with 'first place doesn't lose star' in this thread, if you want to argue about that I suggest you go actually look up some of my post which touch that subject you might be surprised Sadly it is players like you which seem to want to imply that first place in team means someone played better. So if I took my Sims and you a Blys, and we did the exact same things in game, I am still better because I will get more XP just because my ship has a higher internal XP multiplier? XP mechanics are not exactly indicative on how well a player tried to win. You can actually argue that the FACT that there are so many baddies which actually only play to keep their star is hurting teamplay even more. Sadly I can't post account details or it would be very clear this player did NOT deserve to reach rank 1 based on skill, he got there through determination. PERIOD