Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

mtm78

Alpha Tester
  • Content Сount

    19,378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    6105

Everything posted by mtm78

  1. Farazelleth been quite clear: I bought this SO YOU GUYS don't have to ;) Dropsiq on stream said it's a bad ship just due to having DB only, and I'm sure Flamuu already said this himself as well prior to the last changes as he just doesn't like db only CV. None of them had a way of reviewing the final state of the ship before it went to live though.
  2. Yeah I linked iChase review and Notser saying to not buy it,Edited I wonder, is WG NA removing LWM's forum review or is it just WG EU trying to censor things? This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.
  3. WG why you removing links to negative video reviews from your own CC's? Are you sure you're doing the right thing here? I would think it over. edit: what's next, removing ST comments which say the release shouldn't have happened? You can't rub this under the carpet you know, it WAY to late for that.
  4. Edited Review still up at least partially. This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate content
  5. I was about to comment that WG off course cares about their reputation... then I realized I have absolutely zero reasons to actually believe that myself anymore.
  6. NA was warned in advance, I expect almost ZERO sales there after all the CC feedback. To bad EU got it cramped down our throat without our CC's being able to put out a warning. It doesn't really matter how you try and word it, something is not finished, and this should not have been sold this way.
  7. This is about selling an unfinished product, not p2w. Edited This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.
  8. If CV UI is not finished, why are they selling premium CV's without explicitly mentioning that the UI isn't finished ;) No matter which aspect you end up with blaming, it's still not a good release from a customer and from a PR standpoint.
  9. That's the point right, WG said they want simple and clear mechanics for players, yet they rush this for Gamescom when it's clearly not finished unless they lied about making clear and transparent mechanics. Notser EXPLICITLY mentioned a testing round for the drop indicator, I don't always our NA CC's but they deserve it thoroughly this time.
  10. WG legally is covered, all streams with the non gimped and unfinished mechanics had a big WIP on them. But, considering how you have statement from people that the ship is NOT finished and it was NOT intended to go on sale but required another round of testing, and multiple CC's who will support this claim. the rule that if you played a game you're stuck with the ship :-> I would let a lawyer look at that if I had bought it and wanted my money back. I'm pretty sure you can disband the agreement because what is delivered is not what you could expect, but I guess it might depend on local laws. Don't just assume you won't win, consumer protection laws and lobby groups are VERY powerful.
  11. Aka not finished, thank you :)
  12. How about 'finished'. Notser mentioned in his stream about the next round of changes which were supposed to be for TESTING and not release, like a better drop UI. This release is rushed due to Gamescom to milk more people, the ship has NEVER been shown in any stream in this final config, CC's are MAD at WG because they feel their viewers might buy a ship based on their most recent video's of it and this is NOT the same ship which is now in the store. With that statement from Notser about the testing round, sounds pretty believable to me.
  13. Edited? This isn't about powercreep., this is about rushing a ship to make to Gamescom when everyone is saying it's not finished, and WG EU going -:> we can milk more Germans if we sell it anyway, the fallout will be limited so we can just screw with the people who pay for a broken/unfinished product. I didn't buy her and I'm glad, but even if I HAD and I HAD played with her I would still SUE WG to get my money back even if you can't return prem ships after playing. This is just a disgrace, nothing more nothing less. This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inflammatory remarks.
  14. mtm78

    Is the CV player is the team Babysitter?

    Blocking massages does not block quick commands or map spam, just chat. Yes, something which was fixen in wot Agnes ago is not straight implemented in wows..
  15. mtm78

    Is the CV player is the team Babysitter?

    "Right click -> ignore messages" no longer working in game?
  16. mtm78

    Gun Bloom & Spotting time mechanic

    Make it 40 seconds for all I care, BB's shouldn't be sneaky breeky anyway. 40 seconds also is fine for all BB's, as some have longer reload as 30s. You wouldn't want BB with 35s reload to 'blink' because it fades for 5 seconds right :)
  17. I would +1 but I'm out :D ps last sentence made my sides shake violently enough to cause some passing off gas.
  18. Man, feedback has to adhere to forum rules anyway so why try to attach morals or 'feelings' or poor CM's just having evil bosses, on how people should shape their feedback? Giving flak is ok, as long as you do it according to those rules ( this also limits 'flak' a lot, maybe that's enough for you to just agree ). Ow btw 1-2 Schone gooaaaaaaalllll 2 goals in 60 seconds
  19. I'm the same, WoWs was my main game. i mean I played FTL and other indie games at times, and oldies like BoTF or Descent Freespace 1/2/mods. Currently taking vacation from 'main games' and that's mostly because I'm not sure if I should switch or not :( Time will tell
  20. damnit you missed my edit ;)
  21. So who DOES need to be raged at? Or are you a 'happy customer' edit: and before you mention: ofc no one deserves to be raged at, but who should be the target of feedback? Hint, they are actually paid for that job :)
  22. Do I need to quote myself? It's entirely irrelevant what they think unless what they think is actually part of their communication. And any CM which communicates with community how they disagree with their boss does not keep their job. Hence, back to square one: it's irrelevant. CM's are just pass through, never bash them it's both incorrect as well as entirely pointless ( again ).
  23. A community manager ALWAYS supports company decisions or he/she is out of a job. If he/she REALLY supports them is irrelevant.
  24. It's probably because you're addicted. No I'm serious, your brain is so used to start the game and get it's small and diminishing dopamine release due to familiar and semi exciting gameplay. Take a week long break, then first read the forum post from developers and then tell me how much there is left to keep you? I'm still watching streams, but my desire to start the game has gone with the way the balance is being handled.
  25. I don't think we can expect out of office hours statements from WG EU. Maybe tomorrow morning.
×