Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

mtm78

Alpha Tester
  • Content Сount

    19,378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    6105

Everything posted by mtm78

  1. No, we don't need more people playing for themselves over the team's interest. In fact, I would <3 WG to REMOVE XP and credits from losing team, to actually FORCE potato plebs to stop playing selfish and play for the win.
  2. Since players have no relation to WG at all, I expect much more ... uhm... blunt feedback. You know, since if you're not 'constructive' that's not really something they enjoy so not having any relation with them might actually give better feedback... This would be a redeeming chance, I think WG from making the release and initial reactions ( bad things.. ) , has actually taken the best option available to them. This project should be part of their new desire 'to get better at communication'. That is why I would advice people who bought it to see it through and to be part of this. Also, I never said ST feedback has no influence, but WG has themselves said individual ST will not always have an opinion which will be shared by developers or other ST. Think that was in the last ST recruitment thread.
  3. mtm78

    [OMNI]Fara: How to fix Graf Zeppelin

    It is not his triangle system, first one to explain CV's to me in detail was strangers and this is his talk ( he might actually have it from fara or reyte though ). Just saying, his 'system' isn't one player it's just how they ( CV's ) actually work as seen by the best players in that class. But as Ishiro32 has pointed out in another thread, WG has always had access to good CV feedback / suggestion, as some of the best if not the best CV players have been part of ST in the past and present. So having the feedback doesn't seem enough. edit: not even 1/2 way in, but he's already talking about balance paramaters on which I just don't have the expertise to comment since I don't play carriers. The parts I can apply to gameplay, I agree with what he says. 3 TB's with that drop pattern should not be easy kills to DD's for instance. Also his talk about plane utility makes sense.
  4. On the other hand, you will have the opportunity to take part in the balancing project if you don't go for a refund.
  5. mtm78

    iChase removed from WG-CC program

    Cultural differences might apply, in English it's quite common to judge a man's job by telling him he should be fired. That doesn't mean the guy saying it wishes ill things on the other guy, just that he did a very poor job.
  6. mtm78

    How much do you like WOWS?

    There is no value in this poll whatsoever since OP changed poll options half way through. Voting on it has no meaning anymore.
  7. Nah it's time to drop the limit to 3 to make a statement. Idgaf if people threaten to quit if they can't play their precious baby boats.
  8. GZ debacle = bad but will get fixed @Ev1n saying on stream we should get used to them being the most played class and flooding the queue's => cause to uninstall and move on, taking all those juicy premiums I would have bought, premium time I would have paid for to help me grind, and invaluable advice I would have given, away from WG Yeah I know, not much of a threat. But it's all I can do, and I will do so unless this statement is said to be a clear case of broken communication and WG actually still strives to restore NORMAL HEALTHY class balance.
  9. This longer way is actually better, as it allows owners to be involved in the balancing procedure. and if they don't want to they can ask for a refund. WG has gone above and beyond, but come on, they needed to so in the end I would say this is actually good for both sides. WG made a major mistake with how this was handled, now WG is saying they want to commit with owners to a quite elaborate trajectory in fixing it. WG benefits, feedback from paying costumers is probably less tainted as feedback from people who have an existing bond with WG ( ST / CC ). CC might not be as brutally honest as we'd like them to be because they feel they are in a mutually beneficial relation, and ST well I'm sure some people are actually 'impressed' with having that 'title' and not want to say bad things which might harm their 'status'.
  10. mtm78

    Clan stacking is work as intended?

    Suspicious behavior of clans in game should be reported to support :) Counting in is not suspicious behavior, but 'running away and not shooting on your clan members' could actually be crossing a line ( depending on replay ).
  11. So? They should be allowed to ruin the gameplay of EVERYONE ELSE? Babies should be kicked, limit baby access to 3 per game if you want to safe this game and prevent World of Megazao as cruiser.
  12. You really think those people have control? Pretty sure this game wouldn't be where it is now if that would have been true ( it would have been so much better ).
  13. Guys what they mean with: you need X amount of skill before being able to give VALUABLE feedback is pretty simple no? Jingles... entertainment, yes, you do NOT watch him to learn to play the game better ( though he does give very basic advice which ofc can't go wrong, like not sailing broadside to a battleship ). Average players have usually less understanding of game mechanics and are less capable of understanding balance issues. That is why you see so many salty unicums, they actually see the problems average pleb does not. ps: I highly support iChase's decision to at least for now not make use of the offer to return. I think WG needs to work with ALL their CC's right now to set up a behavioral covenant and then actually keep to it.
  14. mtm78

    iChase removed from WG-CC program

    Wait, the salt mines are not real? Mooooommmmyy they are being mean on the internet
  15. Like he was the first saying that?
  16. But it totally contradict everything they been communicating so far, that they wanted to restore balance to what it was during cbt with an optimal number of around 3 battleships or 4. And they said it's mostly tier 8 which is a problem and the numbers supported them. Now it's suddenly: get used to it, they will remain the most played class. Did they really just switch position or is this a miscommunication? I'm not even sure :(
  17. You know, I don't even care about flooding queues with them, as long as they don't flood my actual games..... ( aka WG limit BB's per side, and not to 5 but to 3 ).
  18. I actually said I have faith that her final state will be 'better' at least so I can't really help you in the sense that you might think I could <aluhat> Also, keep in mind I know ST is testing deepwater torpedoes as Ev1n told us about this and now you're saying you are still considering to buy a ship which is now broken but will get those new weapons when they are finished: you have insider information so I have even less reason to fear she never get's a good loadout </aluhat> I been playing Just Cause 3 though, guess it's keeping my need for mindless destruction in check
  19. I heared @Ev1n say on stream we should get used to battleships always being the most played class, and flooding the queues.... It made me cringe.
  20. Yeah but oligarchy has nothing to do with YOU bringing up nationalities or ethnicities? What, you're claiming WG is going to be invaded by Turkey? You naming a country ( inhabitants ) and attributing 'traits' to them is not a need contribution to this thread IMHO. This will be my last reply on this matter.
  21. Oligarchy per definition has NOTHING to do with nationality or ethnicity. Your comparison makes no sense at all. edit: So what, I'm supposed to NEVER miss a post on this forum? I'm being swamped already to keep track of everything
  22. mtm78

    Ban all community contributors

    Where should it be then?
  23. mtm78

    Ban all community contributors

    I agree. Then make Fara the only CC so WG will have no free advertisement except the salt from one of the top CV players who has been told to l2p his new shiny and totally finished Graf Zeppelin.
×