mtm78

Because you're saying I can't play AGAINST or WITH people I know? Again, citation needed. You don't have any actual data to base that on, your 'few hundred observed battles' have no statistical meaning at all I can tell from actually counting in, those screenshots you see are actually rare occasions. Rare enough in light of total battles played it's statistically irrelevant. You want to forbid me from ending up in games matched with or against people in my clan, based on the notion it MIGHT be unfair in some way or not, and you're asking me to why not do it? Really?

I know, life and let life Just without any more money from me :)

Yeah I know, just like introducing battleships with better as cruiser concealment and HE performance to deal with other bow camping battleships.... I agree a lot more with the old vid

On Russian server you get rewards for high karma, premium time iirc. Not 100% sure as I haven't kept up with RU forums in a long time

I was just thinking about fish in general, a nice haring or anything a bit fatty would go down pretty well right now

Because we don't post the times when we're stacked AGAINST each other or end up in different matches. Maybe that is disrupting your understanding, have you ever tried 'counting in' with friends on teamspeak? Try it, then we shall continue this discussion See above. Ask WG ;) I know there been people sanctioned for actions in battle involving clan members on the other team, I am just not going to open that can of worms myself. Uhm no, as we just established your whole chain of thought ( logic isn't the word I would use here ) is wrong so any conclusion you bind to that is invalidated. You are. Unless you want to provide evidence of wrongdoing? I would repeat that 'logic' is not the term I would use if I were you, but I fear it might be in vain. You know what, if what you say is true, you should have no problem getting a few friends on skype/discord/teamspeak whatever you use to talk with people you know, and do count in's trying to get in the same battle. Show us how many times you succeed. You know, try to back up your 'logic' with some tangible evidence. And even IF you manage to do this, and you won't, you still haven't proven any causality between people who cheat and people who are in a clan, since you can also do this outside of clans. Heck SCRUB community is multiple clans due to ........ 30 man limit.

I don't think they will have smoke.... We all know Russia at the time already had black hole technology and could warp spacetime around them.

It's the same with team damage 'meter' actually and it will also drop off. I mean I haven't been chat banned in a long time... not playing much certainly does help as well though

Soon™ you can even get a cruiser/battleship hybrid at tier X, I think it's called a Megazao

Ding ding ding we have a winner!!!!! And that is the whole problem. They don't care because it has not enough consequence for them. Or they don't care because they are the OTHER kind of players, coming here to buy premiums and access time gated content while ignoring this whole 'grinding' stuff. It's not like those campaigns have actually improved gameplay, on the contrary if I see someone do something really stupid now I don't immediately question gameplay abilities. No, I actually think: 'Ow he has this mission to kill two DD's, so he is rushing in will try and kill the DD's, fail and leave us with 1 ship less with nothing in return'.

Citation needed You do realize a lot of SCRUBS for instance might be in totally different countries? It is quite obvious WG has said there is nothing to fix. Citation needed on the 'why' still. No it's not important at all, in fact it's a non-issue. And it will stay a non issue, unless you can show us that citation about how big this problem is, the frequency in which it happens versus the frequency people just end up against each other anyway. AND, then YOU need to PROVIDE ACTUAL EVIDENCE, that this is generally facilitating 'cheating'. I will help you a bit: WG says it's fine unless you have in game situations where people actually play WITH enemy team. If you have such a match, send the replay to support AND THE PEOPLE CHEATING/RIGGING will be dealt with. This whole 'counting in = cheating' is just an attack on clans by people not in one, and WG has told you whiners before you can keep whining about it but it is the way it is. Report actual rigging, and stop crying ffs.

Ow man I was just joking, no one expects window licking to be the secret to clan stacking anyway don't worry the secret is safe.

Idk man, I mean I actually READ people saying Bismarck was the greatest BB ever build and would probably best Yamato in direct combat.... that's still beating the teaaboos complaining about their tech tree so far :D

Damn lucky I wasn't in that match I would have outed you for hax, hags and even window licking!

... so my minus 10 were actually TEN people wow... nah jk, I do think Corvi once got a -11 or so in one battle edIt: I'm not at 0 btw, haven't been in awhile. Guess I stopped trying to help the baddies with not throwing games I almost won for them.

If your sarcasm is on the same level as your forum contributions I think I understand why you don't get many reports for it :D

Now you mention it, that does look like a good size fish. Makes me kinda hungry atm

It's in the twitch vod of the GC saturday stream, can't literally remember what he said but it came down to saying we should get used to battleships being the most played class and flooding the queue's. Which is 100% contradicting what Sub_Octavian said about wanting to restore class balance to the ideal number of 3 battleships per side per battle.

Yes I am, I'm the bane of babies, the opposer of overpopulation and the restorer of class balance .... *insert halo smiley* Or well, maybe I just want a fun game ;)

No. You let your team die by staying back. Listen to better players, stop making excuses, stop ruining our games with sniping, be a man, grow a pair, stop being a baby, I can go on for hours like this, trust me I really can, don't believe me, yeah I bet you do, you should really, babies are evil ok, burn the babies, drown the babies, get the babies down to 3 per side and all people will know eternal bliss and happiness, so I have spoken

There is on RU server, you actually get stuff if you have high karma ( read: if you rig enough with count in's to boost your Karma high enough ).

It's supposed to be protected MM pool, meaning that even when playing low tiers you're NOT going up against the freshest of the players. And even if it were so, I should deny myself fun because WG might lose a new player who can't take taking a beating in one of his first games? Heck I know a solution: FIX THE BLOODY GAME, so I don't feel tempted to play tier 2 premiums in order to have some 'fun'. And MOSTLY, tell @Ev1n to clarify his comment during stream, if he's serious about this being World of Babyboats you guys can have fun without me. ( edit: btw just making sure, I can't get that statement out of my head, it bothers me more than anything I could point out right now about my gaming experience yesterday... )

I don't think it can, I tried my best however :)

Go complain about carriers, it suits you better And yeah, now tell me why seal clubbing might still be fun, what's 'different in those low tiers'? Ow and no, besides player skill ofc And you know what, if WG wants to make this World of Babyboats, I would GLADLY help them drive away new players