mtm78

CBT babies couldn't sit that far back, the CV would finish them off since baby needed AAA esort of it would drown. CBT babies actually MOVED with the fleet, because if they didn't a DD would jump them, and BB AP didn't work on DD''s.... good old times. CBT babies were making up much smaller numbers, with only 3 babies per team cruisers can do their jobs without having to rely on smoke or islands. In CBT, we had almost no babies with really good concealment, now WG will add a baby with better stealth as my Hindenburg / Moskva. And better HE, so the baby can deal with bow camping other babies better... yes, give babies that good HE so it can fight camping babies WG, THAT is how you fix your broken game.... You can't nerf baby boats to much, they just NEED to be limited per game PERIOD. No IF BUT or whatever, LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF FFIN LOLPEN BB AP ON DD'S XAXAXAXA, STOP MAKING BABIES WHO NEED MORE AND MORE DIAPERS ( cruiser traits... like really good HE and concealment yo ).

7/200 is 'empirical evidence' man wow Especially if in those 7 you also have divisions fighting other divisions of THE SAME CLAN... yeah this excrement really wants to tell WG I can't be trusted playing against my clan members, I'm such a dirty cheater wow.... Ow wait... Mods should close this thread ever since that 'subject' came involved it's been nothing but bashing of people in clans

Searchlight consumable... where are the starshells?

Who died and made you anything else then 'just another poster'

I'm very curious if we will get a reaction to Dropsiq's thread....

I'm not a fan of ramming Brigantines but gawd darn it looks pretty nice.

It is my example so it's that simple yes. In that example, you can clearly see why this notion is flawed. You can already earn more XP in the losing team as in the winning team. ^^ most sensible proposition in this thread. Reward actual excellence without hurting gameplay. I mean, good luck trying to 'steal' that much xp.

Yeah let's make BB's with cruiser concealment so we can finally remove cruisers ENTIRELY as there is no FRIGGIN POINT in playing them over Megazao's..... Also don't make me die of laughter with claiming babies will move forward because they are spotted later.

GE USN IJN = 3 USN IJN = 2 Yeah such a big difference! Anyway it won't come before cv rework they said, plan on 2020.

double post nvm

Turning out means enemy planes are in AAA longer and sometimes that could be best, if your AAA is so anemic that it doesn't matter I just turn in, if the cv is bad he might even drop to close. According to WG, battleships were the most commonly deployed class during WWII naval battles. I'd say they've given up on anything resembling semi realism.

But it's a useless board if you let them pick it, you just get yay saying fanbois.

Profile - summary, the little number right next to your name.

My old Sid Meiers !Pirates feeling is tingeling when I look at that.. well not really comparable but still :D edit: Just signed up for the PC beta

It's the same principle: people suddenly having personal objectives instead of a team objective. Gameplay is already a bit worse I feel due all the missions causing people to do stupid things in game they normally wouldn't.

Because we like killing Gene! But, I see it's alu hat time, so I'll just let you to it then.

Small example: You're close to your Kraken but enemy is threatening your cap. You need to go back and defend, but there is a low hp enemy you're likely to kill if you don't. What do you do? Screw your team 100% and go for your 'deserved' XP bonus, or do you try to win? If you say anything but try to win I will kick a baby!

It's also about toxic behavior. not only best case scenario.

The other way around You mean the mechanic giving you so much xp on a loss? Why show that screen instead of base xp? Did you get more XP on the losing team as people on the winning team?

Like hell it should. Kraken not, the kill securing would be even worse as now. High caliber might be acceptable though, one can never do lots of damage and be total selfish a-hole while doing so.

Ok back on topic. It's not like you can filter battles on solo 2 man and 3 man division, noooo got to shittalk others who don't agree with my baddy opinion based on my inability to play the actual game right Yes, there is a reason 3 max division is allowed. And 'clan stacking' has no influence on this as you still failed to provide ANY statistical evidence that it either happens more frequently AGAINST each other as with each other, and were you had been able to do so you would still needed to attribute malice to it greater than the FUN of people of actually SOMETIMES ... since it's quite rare you know.... get in opposing or god forbid the same team? But I'll give up here, you already said you think clan stacking makes the MM no longer random ( again claiming that MM stacks clan's in the same match and that is 'bad' without actually proving to do so ). I'll just end with a: who the HECK are you to tell me I can't play an online game and meet my friends in it by chance.

LOOK MOM NO BRAINS....

So you have no point as we just established it's already possible to get more XP in the losing team as in the winning team.

Yeah and in the mean while me in my Taskent like getting casually depleted of enormous chunks of my hitpoint pool by BB AP. Fun and Engaging I'd say. Ow and it's not just Tashkent.. which is NOT a Khaba with 50mm playing, even my Sims takes casual 6k damage from a single BB shell. Mid 2018 the game might be a BIT more balanced again, well not really since we have to get used to battleships being the most played class and flooding the queue......