mtm78

You're the one making claims everywhere based on 'your logic', maybe it's time for you to stop making baseless accusations? Please PROOF what you're claiming, it's not up to us to proof you're wrong you And I need a vacation? Did you just cry you're reporting me to the mods because your baddie behind can't stop crying about evil divisions and clans?

Premium != more pen. What if premium means better sigma? WG can ruin their games in many ways, just have enough faith

Yeah support might be a bit swamped though with still processing the backlogged tickets from GZ ;)

Nah, my solo wr with them isn't that crappy is it You just need disproportionately more situational awareness in them to get decent results. Babies can just get decent result by rolling head over the keyboard.

Nah, it's same management higher up, heck EU doesn't even have separate WoT and WoWs managers, only NA.

questionable because WG has always claimed in the past the ideal composition has 3 battleships. So they are willing to screw their entire playerbase over the people who just want to disrupt class balance and sit in their big baby boat 20km from the closest enemy.

Limit BB to 3 per side -> no more BB blobs stacking AAA aura's -> easier to be dropped by carriers unless they stick with a defensive fire cruiser. With less BB's, cruisers are more free to roam and support DD's and be the jack of all trades they are supposed to be. DD's will have more support, but will also face more enemy cruisers, hence some ( torpedo oriented mainly ) will need buffing. BB's on the other hand DO NOT HAVE TO CAMP. Because unlike what the baby population claims, it's not torpedoes which makes them camp, it's not HE spam.. it's other battleships. I saw this wonderful game on stream the other day, Tears of the Cruisers epicenter.. only there were no tears... because there were no cruisers. Just battleships. They still camped. And those who pushed into center died due to focus/crossfire from the enemy BB's. BB dpm is not that crap, and when there are that many shooting you you die. Period. Now other point of balance -> Megazao's.... WG you're if you think that introducing better than cruiser concealment battleships with extreme HE performance is not making your game worse and more broken. You don't fix bow camping enemy battleships by giving other battleships better HE You 'fix' them by making sure that bow camping baby is VULNERABLE to CV and DD attacks... something you been working AGAINST since CBT. And you know, cruisers ( aka HE spam ) also can force bow camping BB's to move you know, so why the HECK do you need to nerf IJN cruiser fire chance only to later add BB's with better fire chance? WHY? You're constantly on your way to World of Babyboats, and that is fine with me. Just say it here on forums @Ev1n, about how we need to accept babies being the most played class. Tell me up front please, so I can stop caring for this game. --- Here -> shoot me down PLEASE. I would LOVE to be wrong about this, I really would.

I <3 seeing an broadside Iowa and Montana.... and then getting nothing but pen's on it. WG is making the game worse, not better.

But that mechanic only works because it is a free for all / koth game. I don't see it working in a objective based team oriented game?

Man, I even read something about subs again... right now I wouldn't be surprised by anything I guess.... waiting for reply to Dropsiq's thread....

I'm still thinking about winning that lottery finally...

I am waiting for a radial menu editor like in WoT.... the profiles I would make....

+-3 should be brought back! Would teach people this is mainly a tactical game.. or well it used to be.

If I see any IJN DD not going for a cap within 10 seconds of the game starting I report them People seem to forget, but usually it's the team's job to support the DD's... so no point in waiting what team does, YOU decide right away the cap's your team should contest. Unless whole team goes other way but you can always just switch cap then. Sitting still when game has started in DD gives enemy incredible advantage ( first intel on ship movements is probably even more important as cap pressure ). If you're in a radar cruiser it's ok to see deployment. Also, if you go afk due to real life issues, no problem but I will report you over it. How can I know your house is on fire? From my perspective it's AFK, and AFK has a report option, let WG sort it out. WG doesn't take action on the occasional AFK report, it's only when you get them frequently they will check your account.... and how many times can your house be on fire? That is the algorith which WG uses: frequency of reports. That is why you NEED to report AFK, even if you can't know if they have valid reasons. WG doesn't require you to know 100% sure he is afk for 'wrong reasons', it's not possible to know and thus irrelevant. WG takes this into account by ignoring reports until the number of them actually indicates a probable issue. tl:dr always report AFK. And NEVER sit still in your DD at the start of a match.

Because babies need concealment, it's because they are spotted so quick that they camp yo! Ow wait.... yeah I know, that doesn't make sense now does it...

Ouch

This is also why the proposition of some of making +-1 IF POSSIBLE in a dynamic MM is extremely unfair. So if I play during peak hours I get easy mode +-1, and if I have to work and play during off peak hours I get harder MM because 'screw you'?

No not you There is only one guy who seems to lose sleep over evil divisions increasing OTHER people's stats. ( he might not mention them here, he does in other topics and it's the only reason he cries himself to sleep over it ).

Why is that crybaby crying again about divisions being unfair, and AGAIN trying to state something as a fact when it's just his illusions? Divisions are uptiered just as much as solo players STOP YOUR PATHETIC CRYING ABOUT DIVISIONS FFS. Last time I played every time we took 3x tier 6 we got in tier 8 battles, and 3x tier 8 get's into tier 10 battles. Stop blaming being such a baddie on 'evil divisions' please.

I've had those, 2.x k xp losses with the enemy guy topping out at 1.7k base xp. I had them two times for sure, where I would have gotten Not Even Atlas. In 5k games. I'd say I'd earned getting a bit more xp for those two games, then again, I had over 2k base xp on a loss so... but yeah you really just can't accumulate that much without actually having played like you have to carry not just 11 players but the entire world I'm not even sure I ever got a score which would give me Atlas... can't remember that's for sure Would be fun, but WG isn't the company to directly insult their players.....

4.7m on my Moskva, not sure what about my Yammy but I think this is my record. edit: btw any site which can tell me this without logging into my client?

Find some friends and play in divisions, play some operations or pve?

I was hoping they were preparing a single statement to be given out yesterday, but it looks like WG rather ignores this topic yes. Sad.

Thanks, looking at it right now! You mean you're not really want to talk about other games being fun and balanced, with fun and engaging mechanics to boot? That's a shame :(