-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mtm78
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Ahhh, color me surprised :) -
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Historically accurate I bet.... -
Option to turn down or even tuen off the new fire & smoke effects?
mtm78 replied to IanH755's topic in General Discussion
To bad, would have <3 to read original post I don't have issues with the smoke, if you do try complaining to WG. They are likely to tell you smoke is becoming a problem, it lives to long and it does to much damage. Then they will introduce more smoke, just for balance. -
Option to turn down or even tuen off the new fire & smoke effects?
mtm78 replied to IanH755's topic in General Discussion
Those are my settings, I don't have any issue with these settings and the new effects. I haven't tried with, but not ticking 'Reduced fire effect' when having multiple fires on your battleship sounds like a likely cause. This fire frame effect scales with the amount of fires on your ship, more fires -> more smoke. Otherwise, general 'effects' preset and quality greatly influence how smoke is drawn. Higher settings will probably make more transparent smoke edges. -
Option to turn down or even tuen off the new fire & smoke effects?
mtm78 replied to IanH755's topic in General Discussion
I would have at least expected something like: .. I mean, show some effort before asking for the answer right? -
Nah I'll rather reply here, this is a public discussion board after all. You can however request the thread to be closed by a moderator Instead of threatening to fully quit, you just should have told WG you will keep your wallet closed. Money talks, free2play helps inflate player count but money is where you show your level of 'appreciation'
-
Option to turn down or even tuen off the new fire & smoke effects?
mtm78 replied to IanH755's topic in General Discussion
It's a bit like a tier X player asking how to open the big minimap, or how to follow your shells and torpedoes -
Lol 130 battles guy comes and tells us we need submarines.... Guess what 'guy' ->
-
Option to turn down or even tuen off the new fire & smoke effects?
mtm78 replied to IanH755's topic in General Discussion
He plays WG games -
RNBB fire spam self fulfiling prophecy
mtm78 replied to Admiral_noodle's topic in General Discussion
I felt a bit bored, I was adding text to another one as well but no need to post it yet It also helps knowing certain people's posting habits / history, the image applies man sorry As to the HE vs AP discussion, you people seem to be missing the point: it's to easy to get decent results using either on almost all targets. There is almost no need to switch ammo, they are forgiving to play and lazy people can snipe with them for most of the game before enemies will become a real threat to them since they hug the blue line. And WG wonders why battleships are so 'loved'.... but hey at least they don't have radar or defensive AAA right! -
RNBB fire spam self fulfiling prophecy
mtm78 replied to Admiral_noodle's topic in General Discussion
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
You mean even dispersion benefit isn't limited to babies anymore.. what a surprise -
RNBB fire spam self fulfiling prophecy
mtm78 replied to Admiral_noodle's topic in General Discussion
Well yeah ofc but when do you actually... Yeah indeed Would be nice meeting one once, like meeting a unicorn it would be magic I suppose. -
RNBB fire spam self fulfiling prophecy
mtm78 replied to Admiral_noodle's topic in General Discussion
1.5k battles, other posted is still wet behind the ears, safe to ignore ;) -
Nah, the players are just as guilty as WG, not more. Yeah players are the one's actually thinking: mhm, here we have ship A, it's pretty effective and easy to play! And this is ship B, it's perhaps equally effective, but I can play it without much effort at all. But it's WG who puts them in the game in that state, so shared blame. Actually, nah it's just WG's fault, you can't expect different from players. So your BB doesn't suffer much from other BB's? How refreshing! Also, QE doesn't have super heal. Sadly wotapi.ru is down but -> http://www.vbaddict.net/servers/world-of-warships/ Sadly only shows so far back. And no, I actually played ONLY this game, and YES that is getting less and less. And it won't stop until WG get's their act together. No more moniez from me :)
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
Fara wants a competitive game where he can choose which carrier suits him the best for a given match up / map. Instead WG wants to give him another gimmicky CV which will work in randoms because plebs, but has no spot in competitive as the 'gimmicky' things are always something which can be countered. Wouldn't it be nice if you could see competitive games and see more as one nation's carriers being actually considered? -
Why allow mods the show speed and direction?
mtm78 replied to JohnNightOwl's topic in General Discussion
You mean that when it wasn't declared illegal and everyone was free to use it? And in those few days I used it because I wanted to know what the frigging fuzz was about, I think I even posted that it somehow doesn't really work as people kept using mean WASD hacks, before realizing that it only helps those who can't aim to start with? If that's what you mean, yeah maybe. Yeah, those half a dozen games I might have played with an at the time legal modification, that really messed up my stats I don't think it ever left, well the 'commercial one's' that is. Guess you could just as well stop playing altogether. Ow, and don't go play WoT either, they have this thing called Warhack or something Nah I did, I talked about it on forum as well as at the time it wasn't a forbidden modification and WG was allowing the mod to be shared on this forum ( for a limited time before getting to current stance about aim assists ). But in total I played maybe 5 games with it. He wants to brag about his 'performance' while playing vanilla, and everyone who uses any kind of mod might as well use the aim assist as they all 'cheat' and haven't gotten their stats in the 'honest way'? -
So WG, let's discuss the changes in the game and your plan.
mtm78 replied to C4PT41N_0BV10US's topic in General Discussion
Another weekend of being ignored by WG, how great and surprising -
Why is this meaningless excuse of a distraction ( it worked pretty well btw ) still active when Dropsiq's thread isn't even on first page.... You minions keep bumping the wrong thread. do I need to cut your allowance again?
-
RNBB fire spam self fulfiling prophecy
mtm78 replied to Admiral_noodle's topic in General Discussion
Even if you do that it will likely be still to many potato's in battleships queuing and infecting the game, how about doing both? Imho starting with 3 limit ofc -
RNBB fire spam self fulfiling prophecy
mtm78 replied to Admiral_noodle's topic in General Discussion
I don't have enough games without 5 bb's per side that's the problem. Probably will take a month or two before RN numbers drop... if ever... -
So WG, let's discuss the changes in the game and your plan.
mtm78 replied to C4PT41N_0BV10US's topic in General Discussion
Pretty convinced at this point WG will just continue to ignore this topic for as long as possible, and sadly I expect just some 'we are monitoring the situation' kinda answer...
