-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mtm78
-
Check, check, check. Ow, you weren't asking who bought those exact premiums ( though then again, I also have a Lowe and a I think every Matilda variant in the game ( two of which are premium ). Edit: Imperator is OP because it has 12 forward firing gun's at a tier where people normally aren't really experienced and therefore they don't plan ahead as well. With the turret config and turret firing angles you're almost TOLD how to angle your ship effectively. It is a quite easy to play ship. It also doesn't feel as derpy as most other tier 4 BB's ( reasonable stable grouping on the shells ).
-
An Iowa with radar... is no normal Iowa :P edit: unless you're a no skill baddie which doesn't know how to take advantage of it, then it's just another Iowa with another button which does something *but I'm not sure what it does so I just randomly press it*.
-
No submarines, but this game was so good back in it's days -> http://www.myabandonware.com/game/the-ancient-art-of-war-at-sea-9v Can't get it to run anymore, not even with dosbox. To bad, I've been playing my 'classics' a bit and what do you know, gameplay DOES beat fancy graphics
-
No. It's not pay2win, as even baddies in a Belfast are still baddies. But, it certainly feels like pay4advantages if premium ships are straight up better as their tech tree counterparts. Gremmy / old Gnevny, Leningrad / Minsk, Arizona / New Mexico. Harder to make that claim with Belfast since it's tech tree counterpart is also the strongest CL tier for tier in the game, but Belfast is specialized in winning games by ganking destroyers with radar equal to concealment... and yes that's just broken, ESPECIALLY on a ship with smoke. And yeah USN CV's vs IJN CV's is a long lasting 'issue' for WG. Not sure they will ever get things done right.
-
Anyone else think this is getting alittle boring?
mtm78 replied to DBoZ_Skyline's topic in General Discussion
But you don't see this in the game itself, so it wouldn't cause so much 'discomfort' :) I've seen teams with divisions from the top clans just melting, and teams filled with joe average's dominate better teams. Some new battle mode which would put players in leagues could be 'nice' but we will soon™ have clanwars. Now, MM not taking into account basic things like ship roles ( does it have a radar.... ) now that's something they should put some priority behind fixing. -
Anyone else think this is getting alittle boring?
mtm78 replied to DBoZ_Skyline's topic in General Discussion
You're just if you think rank equals skill Stop crying. -
Yeah because babies need more diapers How about we only change the broken stuff instead of adding more broken stuff into it?
-
We all know they will make an exception for the Italian line as they wouldn't know how to use stronk ships anyway, they are most likely to be held in port the entire war \ /enoughcountrybashingfortodayandbtwIloveItalianpleasebuymeaFerrari!!
-
Baddies and newbs trying to ruin a game further which once was a boatload of fun
-
But that's normal for WG games, they have to keep you grinding right. Can't have it that you grinded a line last year and it's as good or even better as something new right, why would you grind the new stuff if the old stuff works just as well.
-
I can semi understand total shitters and people who never played ( could also be a shitter but that has to be determined still then ), but people who actually played this game, and still asking for subs..... Yeah, you're asking for a baby counter. Good luck, not that I think we NEED submarines, we just need WG to stop nerving anything which makes their babies cry for fresh diapers. Submarines don't fit gameplay period, and no I don't care we can CHANGE the gameplay to suit subs... go away, far far away ( and don't come back unless you learned subs are bad mkay ).
-
Discussion thread for "some interesting info around the world"
mtm78 replied to Deamon93's topic in General Discussion
True, in fact I think this will be extremely frustrating ( I hated Fuso for same reason -> vertical dispersion aka shots going long and short aka straddling the target ).I mean I also <3 Fuso for when she get's it right, but it's why I dislike playing battleships in general, to much variance for individual rolls/rng and low rof make it .. frustrating... even if overall performance is pretty broken on most babyboats. -
Idk, try doing that with low tier VMF Suicide range torps aren't made for smoke saturation, though if you can get close enough without being spotted the torps are quite nice.
-
So WG, let's discuss the changes in the game and your plan.
mtm78 replied to C4PT41N_0BV10US's topic in General Discussion
Weekend is over, let's see how we will get ignored today -
Wait, there are people who have no issue with the D? The D is the first thing on my mind waking up, wondering how I'll deal with the D on that day, and the next, and the day after that one. The prospects of constantly having to deal with the D is taxing, I can feel my youth slipping away with each night I lay awake worrying about the D. Maybe we should get rid of the D all together, just as health care precaution?
-
Anyone else think this is getting alittle boring?
mtm78 replied to DBoZ_Skyline's topic in General Discussion
I have purple wr wew... but I'm not a unicum I even told Sub_Octavian that when he accused me of not being able to see through average player eyes just because I don't agree with his statement that dd players lack the single working non intoxicated brain cell to actively switch ammo in game I don't think you have more than 1% real unicums, just have to forget about win rate OR just check solo win rate exclusively. -
Are you sure it is on their end, as you seem to be the lone guy crying wolf when most of the sheep have updated normally ( ... ) I did have an issue like that before, but others updated normally at the same time. Might be a load issue on WG's server, or it might be a routing issue somewhere, or a hop with high packet loss. Might help to try to run a network analysis check with the update server ( run a tracert, pingplotter, WGCheck network diagnostics ).
-
Anyone else think this is getting alittle boring?
mtm78 replied to DBoZ_Skyline's topic in General Discussion
So that is why I all those 'winrate' 'unicum' and 'PR rating' numbers in stream tittles on twitch, because they don't have an influence on how many people watch and might sub so they can put food on the table ( meh ok most streamers need day jobs but still I wanted to nit-pick ). -
RNBB fire spam self fulfiling prophecy
mtm78 replied to Admiral_noodle's topic in General Discussion
But, they shoot their broken torpedoes from stealth, how am I supposed to .... ow wait, there are keys which control my ship? You mean I don't HAVE to sail in straight lines the whole time? Noooo, there is even a key which makes the minimap bigger? And those arrow like icons on there, those are destroyers? I can even roughly time their torpedo reload, and none of them is so fast it will circle around me before launching again so I might actually know which direction to expect torps to come from? You mean that even without using something like a spotter plane or a fighter plane, let alone German hydro, I will have advanced warning? And that if I get caught with my pants down, it's no one's fault but my own? -
RNBB fire spam self fulfiling prophecy
mtm78 replied to Admiral_noodle's topic in General Discussion
Battleships are becoming a problem, they live to long and do to much damage... that was what WG said right.. so off course they make them super effective vs their counters, because of balance comrade, balance! -
Anyone else think this is getting alittle boring?
mtm78 replied to DBoZ_Skyline's topic in General Discussion
If you don't have that, how can you argue for ranked being even related to actual skill? You make the claim, you need to provide burden of proof. I/we just pointed out that ranked is filled with battle button spamming mouth breathing monkeys just as randoms. and that some of those will be lucky enough to hit the battle button often enough at the right time for MM to trow them teams which finally carry them a rank higher. And yes, I actually DO have evidence of that, sadly moderators have told me it's naming and shaming when I link to that 44% wr 1400 battles rank 1 player ( with 46% account wr, some of his tier X's in the 30's ). -
Anyone else think this is getting alittle boring?
mtm78 replied to DBoZ_Skyline's topic in General Discussion
I said ranked is far from skill based, end of discussion period 44% wr 1400 battles reaching rank 1 is NOT skill it's determination. Saying ranked is skill based just makes you the center of ridicule, but please continue I don't mind ^^ sadly some of those players will feel reinforced if people argue ranked is 'skill based' -
Anyone else think this is getting alittle boring?
mtm78 replied to DBoZ_Skyline's topic in General Discussion
Can I please insult you? I mean, it must be very hard to division in ranked right :) Ow, this high wr low rank player has a comparably high win rate in RANDOMS as well, even SOLO. Don't EVER mention Ranked as skill based or get pointed at and laughed, hard. Pathetic. -
Anyone else think this is getting alittle boring?
mtm78 replied to DBoZ_Skyline's topic in General Discussion
Clan wars is coming bois... if you can hold on to your sanity long enough with world of babies SBMM is not going to happen, WG doesn't want to. They want good players to farm bad players, they told us we earned that right by being better as them ( seriously, not my statement, theirs ), Clan wars MIGHT actually fix this... if they do it right. So that 44% wr 1400 battles rank 1 player is more 'skilled' as the 68% 20 games rank 12 player? -
Option to turn down or even tuen off the new fire & smoke effects?
mtm78 replied to IanH755's topic in General Discussion
I like the way you think
