allufewig

It is only pay to win when you cant lose anymore? Sorry but thats BS. Imperator is as much p2win as it gets.

Dude, I am your biggest fan and Im not even joking! Your replys are amazing!

Lexington+Atlanta. Jesus... I said high-level, not troll-division. ;P Atlantas and MKs AA is roughly similar with an slight adavantage for Atlanta only when fully AA-maxed since most of Atlantas dps comes from guns >85mm caliber which benefit all the skills. But this is also only as long as her dual-purpose guns arent destroyed and we all know how easy they die... But now for something exciting from the russian Q&A: Carnotzet, on 06 April 2016 - 01:06 PM, said: 8. Why do Atlanta's torpedoes have only 4.5km range whereas Benson's have 9.2km, even though they're the same (Mk 15 mod.3)? Moreover, Atlanta has similar stats as tier 6 ships, although she's supposed to fight up to tier 9 ships. A. Even though their model is the same, torpedoes can vary in range and speed. It's normal. Don't lose hope, we have some buffs planned for her. We're aware of this issue.

Fcking finally!

Hm maybe I should rebuy and finish the fighter-Bogue. Just to troll the cv- trolls trolling the trollship that is Imperator. Its the circle of troll.

The only ships I truly fear in Imperator are NMs (maybe Fusos to some extent too) and all CVs. T4/5-games feel like autowin until you have a carrier in the enemy teams that wants you and only you for playing the Imperator and wont let go until youre dead. Overall Imp is OP like hell. Im glad I bought it.

Competitive is ranked and TBs. Those two modes come with a rank or rating to compare yourself or your team with others. The higher you go in rank/rating the fewer Atlantas you see, for obvious reasons. I have not seen teams use Atlanta in alpha league other than for trolling and the amount of Atlantas in the rank1-5 bracket also nears zero. Personally Im a bit of a tryhard, I will freely admit that. But how does that change the facts?

Did you google "shavtiti" too? It translates to "realize" or "understand" and would indeed fit here. The funny thing is that the correct spelling is apparently "shvatiti".

No no! Im not calling people who like escort-duty [edited]. I call people [edited] that take Atlanta in competitive modes and truly believe to be able to play on a high level with it. Thats a massive difference.

Then I bow to him for this costly and time-consuming attempt on trolling. But right now I am still 99,999% sure he is just....special.

He is not a troll. That is the only obvious thing here. No one plays 6k coop-battles and buys various premiums to play the obvious troll on the forums.

Anyone who takes an Atlanta for teambattles (other than for the intent of trolling) is a reta*d. Same goes for ranked. If you have an Atlanta on your team in ranked, youre down by one ship from the start in the very most cases. Atlanta is not a ship for competitive play. Escorting in randoms will yield you no wins. If you dont kill/wreck stuff yourself, you rely on random potatoes to do the real work for you. Needless to say that for good players, this is not an option in any way. That leaves the Atlanta as an escort in divisions. Fine, now there we have a spot for it. (Kutuzov still does everything better). But is this really worth 35€?

To be honest, I have absolutely no idea what youre saying, but in some weird way this is amazing. Its like abstract art with (mostly) english words. I go shavtiting now. Peace!

Sounds like google-translate in full ret*rd mode.

Einfach nie näher rangehen als 16km. Größe, Agilität, Camo, DPM und vor allem die maximal 50mm Panzerung vor der großen Zitadelle verbieten das. Es wäre das perfekte Schiff für die ganzen Sniperpussies. Im Gegensatz zu ihren BBs bekommen sie mit der Kirov sogar eine gute Ausrede mitgeliefert, warum sie dahinten rumgammeln.

Richtig schön gemacht das Ganze. Macht auch Spass! Nur die Soundeffekte im Hafen gehen einem bei den Comicschiffen schnell auf den Keks.

Kaum. Die meiste "Schuld" dürfte das Mirror-mm dran haben, denn es hat CV-fahren stressig und anspruchsvoll gemacht. Ein kompetenter Spieler kann mit dieser Klasse immernoch den meisten Einfluss auf das Gefecht nehmen. Wenn er den gegnerischen CV früh erledigen kann ist das Spiel oft schon entschieden. So mächtig sind die Dinger immernoch. Edit: Aber es stimmt natürlich, dass der generelle Populationsrückgang bei den CVs den DDs sehr entgegengekommen ist. Zumindest im Low-und Midtier wandelt sich das aber seit den letzten Patches wieder. Sehr viele Spiele mit CV, teilweise sogar 2 pro Seite.

Hami is among us, he didnt even feel the need to disguise himself. Already better than our OP. http://warships.today/player/500513914/eu/Hami Met him sometime in December iirc, he was flaming like crazy. Sure he had his share of chatbans already.

Playing WoT since 2011. Never heard of you. No impressive stats or winrate there either. @OVanBruce: Fieldcommander is the term for the "leader" of a teambattle. The term is used in WoWs also.

Misunderstanding I guess. I had the playerskill in mind, not the amount of players. The captains (those in front of the monitor) of the ru cruisers must be much better on average than the players of other lines. Probably veterans in search of new toys or something.

I am really 100% sure we have a population-bias here. Svietlana for example is mediocre at very best. Its probably better than the Karlsruhe, but thats it. There is just no way that - given an identical playerbase for both - it would ever beat a Kuma or Phoenix.

Jedes Schlachtschiff wird als Sniper falsch gespielt. Es gibt halt ein paar die noch eher etwas weiter hinten stehen dürfen als andere. Die Kongo mit ihrer Asi-Beweglichkeit würde ich gegen das Gewusel auf T5 nicht sofort in die allererste Reihe fahren. Daher in der Aufzählung. Generell dürfte der TE im deutschen oder russischen Kreuzerbaum am ehesten auf seinen Geschmack kommen. Nein. Situationen in denen die Sekundär wirken kann ergeben sich aus dem Spielfluss, suchen solltest du diese Momente nicht. Eigentlich haben alle Schlachtschiffe ihren optimalen Wirkungsbereich irgendwo im großzügig bemessenen Bereich von 10-18km. Drunter steigt die Torpedogefahr, drüber verlierst du zuviel Genauigkeit, dpm und manchmal auch Durchschlag.

Es gibt schon Schiffe die sind nicht wirklich für den Nahkampf geeignet und man spielt sie besser von etwas weiter hinten. Das soll nicht bedeuten Kartenrand, aber doch relativ "snipey". Von den Schiffen die ich gespielt habe fallen mir da spontan die Kongo, Kutuzov, Kirov oder evtl. auch Pensacola ein. Der deutsche und russische Kreuzerbaum sollten jeweils ein paar solcher Schiffe (wie eben die Kirov) im Programm haben. Gerade Schlachtschiffe sollten eigentlich tendenziell eher nicht auf maxrange spielen. Die Trefferquote wird zu schlecht, der mögliche Alpha pro Salve und der dpm gehen zum Teufel und die Panzerung/HP sind komplett verschwendet. Entsprechend ist kaum etwas so verhasst wie diese gepanzerten Shotguns die auf Scharfschütze machen.

What exactly makes this guy special?

That is just what I called them because of the playstile felt so similar. The main difference of Pepsi<->NO is that you exchange some agility for armor and a bit of concealment. Thats noticeable when playing but doesnt change the general stile so much. From New Orleans to Des Moines the ships are even less different from each other. Basically the only thing that distinguishes them (apart from visuals, and even then Balti-DM are almost the same) is rate of fire an a rep-consumable for the two hightiers. The other lines I have played didnt feel so much like attack of the cloneships to me. But that is a bit subjective, of course.