Battleship_Nagato

The standard containers are very fitting for "soviet era" economy, worthless small boosters and whatnot for actual useful resource.

No, the event is far too pricey. 200 tokens for a 0.5% chance, for 1000 gold no less? I guess the G in WG stands for greed.

How best to play them: don't. They have CL guns with CA fire rates, which is absolutely horrible. All the negatives with none of the positives. Even their AA is a joke.

Perhaps you should give *all* the ships some form of ASW.

Something tells me this is the technical difficulty, not something else.

"Boost player counts for us to earn the privilege of giving us more money! Love, WG" The jokes just write themselves.

This is the only reply to this whole thread? Shows what WG feels about us, really.

Wargaming, please go back in time, all the way to 1940, and get all your corporate leaders in a British merchant ship. Is this really how you treat the community? Where is the apology?

That's called stock grind.

Yeah sure, I'll recommend this game after what you have done to LWM... are you insane or just paid to act like it?

It *is* technically true though. They are selling us things, and it is summer... just not a good sale, or a decent sale, or you know, anything worthwhile.

Oh look, Alaska, a removed ship, nerfed just so slightly and got to tier 8 for some reason.

But that official stance can be changed in an instant. We players need a guarantee about it. And in the first iteration, those module missions were supposed be removed in a patch cycle or two, only the community uproar made them last a year. As for hoping... there's a great saying about this: hope in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first.

The special module missions were supposed to be permanent too. What makes this one different? Who is to say it won't be removed after a year?

You wouldn't remove the special credit mission after a while, right WG? Riiiiight, WH? Because I can remember another set of missions that used to be permanent but removed for more profits.

We all know it's going to be Hipper or if it needs to be a premium, Wukong or Belfast Gimped Edition

If it does, it's Shokaku or Enterprise time.

It can get to 12.2 km detection, which is just slightly more than a Myoko I think. Unless it's sarcasm, then well played ice fairy

Literally days after they change their company policy about nerfable premium ships:

"The no nerfing premiums policy changing has nothing to do with us releasing a very OP premium and nerf it down the line when the sales dwindle! Honest!" -WG, probably.

And here we are, with the supertest of USS Congress, a literal Alaska at tier 8 with 2 less guns, with changes so minor you'd think it was "Kremlin-nerfed" to fit one tier below. Here, take a look at it yourself.

We could build a two lines of French battleships, starting from tier 6: Dunk, Strasbourg, Richelieu, Jean Bart, Bourgogne as first line, and Normandie, Lyon, Flandre, Alsace and Republique as the second one, with Champagne as the token tier 8 premium.

False equivalence. WG can make comprehensive gameplay changes, they already did... what was it, the CV rework was the last one, I'm sure you heard of that one. But making comprehensive gameplay changes is a bit different than nerfing a premium ship. Just a little bit.

Why would I want something I paid for get worse? It is WG's job to release balanced ships, not mine.