CountOfTuscany

I also want to play the Russian kruzers. 'Cause they are such an offense to quite some people, and I can't wait to be TK'd by someone who is really offended by the fact that his/her favorite navy isn't in the game while the Russians are (or should I say Soviet kruzers? There are even people who are offended if you call them Russian instead of Soviet and probably there also people who think the same visa versa)

Ok, sounds good. I wonder what the differences will be. I filled in the application form on the site.

Well I hope that the HMS Campbelltown doesn't feature a very strong but one time use attack

what? Warspite?

I think subs are already weak enough when submersed (at least in real life it was). When they are surfaced they are blown straight out of the water. A single shell hit of even a destroyer gun can wreck havoc on your sub, let alone heavier guns. Subs are also terribly slow, a Langley might outrun them, combine this with the fact that you have to get to reasonably close range to make effective use of torps (like hitting stuff). Also I guess it will be a real pain to only have up to 4 torps per volley (I think this is the maximum amount of torps a sub can fire at a time in the frontal direction, anyone can confirm?) and to have to traverse the hull of your sub to adjust aiming, I guess the latter would make the class completely unplayable. Tons of sub proposals have been made already (I guess you could have found them with the search function - if they aren't already deleted), and I think it also has been confirmed by WG that there won't be subs in the game.

ah, I see. Haven't played too many battles up till now. I prefer playing in platoons/divisions, but that does not occur too often. But when I play I'm always interested in learning to become better/ to understand the game better (as far as the latter is possible :p ) But I guess the lesson system etc in SGWA is similar to SGTA, so that should be nice (I used to be part of SGTA back in the day)

Is there a minimum amount of PvP battles needed to join?

Well OP, you go a point, a bunch of those ships is indeed soviet. But this doesn't mean that the entire tree should be regarded as soviet, since this would discredit the first set of ships in the line whose where of the Imperial Russian Navy. tbh, it would sound a bit cumbersome to name the tree "Russian and Soviet tree" of "Imperial Russian Navy and Soviet Navy" or "IRN & VMF". Also, while the Soviet Union contained a ton of people form different ethnicities and different (overthrown) states, wasn't this the same case in Imperial Russia? And wasn't Armenia (at least partially) also not part of this Imperial Russian empire?

http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/46058-play-in-premium-ship-get-reported/page__pid__894727#entry894727 This comment by mtm made my day

ah, I see.

what answer?

How would radar be a final blow to VMF DDs? Ok, I see the problem if you are often close to enemy ships using offensive smokes, but USN DDs got this problem also. I guess as a VMF DD you want to maintain distance, so 9-10km of radar range is't a big deal if you navigate your ship at some 10km range...

I guess it's a good idea. The amount of xp earnt is way less than the amount of raw credits earned, so the increase isn't to much (so not to much of a problem for WGs view on credits production). Other feature that might be nice is the enhanced crew training function that is available on elited tanks in WoT. Would be nice if it would be implemented here, to speed up the training of captains.

Ok, sounds like some average saturdaynight behaviour (well for some people ofc).

oh, what crime did you observe? Guess it wasn't TKing

still rusan kruzers will be furst

So I just read the title of this topic: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/45748-super-intendant-skill-not-working-for-ibuki/page__pid__886790#entry886790 And the first thing that came to mind is: "super intendant not working as intendant" Guess that that is a really bad pun..

So I just watched this vid: And I think I'll try to use some more AP next time I play Gremmy

I never really noticed your sig before pano, but I like it.

shell velocity seems quite nice. stronk range overall tier 5 looks like it will be fury taco like? detectability seems nice overall except the last 2 tiers I get the idea that the entire line (except tier 5 maybe?) heavily benefits from demolition expert.

Congrats!

thread ded.

midway much?

hmm, sounds a bit obvious, but how to exactly execute without dying? got at most 2 skills at my captains, so ain't respeccing much

little baby seal looking for fellow gremy captains to mentor the baby seal. baby seal being me with an awesome service record on my gremy with 1 win and two losses. I think I need someone to help me learn to play the thing.