Jump to content

lord_yggdrasill

Players
  • Content Сount

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    6065
  • Clan

    [TEMP]

About lord_yggdrasill

  1. lord_yggdrasill

    Just another IJN DD rant

    You guys bring up very valid points and I totally agree. IJN DDs are still played very frequently, you rarely see a game without one. And yes, this comes mostly down to the different playstyle that a lot of people enjoy, me (obviously) included. What I made my post for was not asking for a massive buff on multiple points i raised. I would rather like a few tweaks at one or two stats, because that's what balancing is all about. For example: Why does the Shimakaze lose gun performance in compairison to the Yuugumo? To make up for getting nearly double the amount of torps? Probably. But other ship lines also get way more poweful at T10. Why do the Shima torps have a higher torpedo redectability in compairison to the Yuugumo (1.9 vs 1.7) while having the same speed? Usually in this game Speed and Dectetebility are correlated (at least within a nation). Why does the Gearing still has 16.5km torps? WG does not like long range torps (and I understand that), so why is this still in the game? Little things like this would make the Shimakaze more competitive and not not break the game. The Shimakaze especially really frustrated me lately. Helping your team by trying to cap something at the beginning of a match can just be suicide. You get detected by radar or a Fletcher/Gearing at the same time you detect them, everybody is turning their guns towards you and you are done or very crippled. Having this experience multible times made me pretty much abandon caps at the start. Then I jump into my Shiratsuyu and suddenly you feel much stronger. You decide when to engage someone, there is less radar and hydro around. I overall have a 75% win rate and identical average damage numbers to my Shimakaze. Yes, Shirastuyu is a bit overpowered. Which is just so weird when you look at her stats, because all of this comes down to the stealth and reload booster. Hence why I suggested to look into this option as a special thing for IJN DDs. Torpedoes in general are very unforgiving and not a very flexible armament. With reloads over two minutes at higher tier it would really help having a shorter reload in specific situations. Because that is exactly what makes Shirastuyu a (too?) strong ship. Having the option to reduce said reload to let's say one minute once or twice in a game would make the Shimakaze a much more unpredictable enemy. When you currently are sailing around in your Yamato and you see Shima torps coming your way you dodge them and then ignore the fact that there is a Shima somewhere for two minutes. I experienced many situations when playing the Shiratsuyu where your enemy is just surprised you already have more torps to go and call you a hacker. This is just an idea of how you could go to improve the gamplay experience of IJN DDs. My main reasoning for all of this is also something you stated: WG lacks a vision and direction of what to do with IJN DDs. Their guns will never be on par with other nations and thats fine. They are good enough for what they need to be. A secondary armament that can surprise people at times, finish off low health DDs, setting a fire or two, etc. It just gets frustrating in situations where you should be rewarded: Sneaking up successfully on the enemies side, launching your torps and then seeing the enemy BB just dodge all but one of them because he can spot them nearly 2km before they hit. He takes maybe 10-15k damage, repairs the flooding, heals up and nothing really has happened. You now sit there with your main armament on a 100-120 second reload with not really that much options other than smoking up and trying to set a fire or going for a cap or just reposition for your next attack. A good play by an IJN DD can get destroyed by so many things out of your control. A 0.1 to 0.2 km buff to torpedo detectability would therefore already be a welcome change. You see I could talk about this for hours without end. I'm just passionate about the game and want it to be as fun as possible for everybody.
  2. lord_yggdrasill

    Just another IJN DD rant

    It has been a while now since the IJN DDs got their split and I thought it would be a good time to talk about my fellings about them in a pretty lengthy post. After having played them all pre and post split, I want to present my opinion on what their flaws are and why I still think that they need to be buffed. First of all let's look at some statistics. If you check the winrates and average experience of all DDs from T6 to T10 you will find an IJN DD at the bottom. So it's not just one or two ships underperforming, it's an entire line of ships. However there are some exceptions: the T6 Shinonome (premium; reward for advanced players with high tier ships -> understandibly outperforms everything at T6) and the destroyers of the new subbranch. I wont talk much about Akizuki because she plays completely different to all other IJN DDs (very gun focused; big, slow and sluggish). The two Ships leading up to the Akizuki are interesting though. The Hatsuharu is performing ok at T6 and better than Fubuki. But the most outstanding ship is the Shiratsuyu at T7 which is currently the best (statisticaly speaking) DD for its tier. One reason for this is probably the fact that the line spit is still too recent and mostly dedicated players with some experience in IJN DDs are currently grinding towards the Akizuki. This however does not explain the huge difference between Akatsuki and Shiratsuyu at Tier 7 (we are speaking of a 6% difference in winrate and about 50% more experience and damage for Shiratsuyu). Looking a bit more into the stats of these two Ships you can get a bit confused. Akatsuki is the same in terms of her gun and torpedo performence while having one extra gun, 4 knots higher top speed and an extra torpedo tube with a more favourable launcher setup (3x3 vs 2x4) therefore having a 25% better reload speed on those tubes. Ignoring some very minor differences in HP and range the only things Shiratsuyu has going for her are a bit better maneuverability and massively better concealment. In addition to this Shiratsuyu has the torpedo reload booster consumable on a seperate slot which reduces the torpedo reload to 5 seconds once every 6 minutes (4 with premium). Her output of torpedoes over 10 minutes even with using the consumable is lower than Akatsukis. In practice and my personal experience these two advantages of Shiratsuyu are crucial to her success. The concealment advantage over any other ship at T7 is huge (we are talking about nearly a kilometer here) so you can dictate a combat with another destroyer by engaging only in favourable fights and sneak up an your main target (enemy BBs) very easily. The second advantage is your torpedo reload booster. If this consumable is ready you basicly have a 4x4 torpedo setup (yes, this is one more torpedo than a Shimakaze) and you can freely engage multible targets at once. Need to lay a big torpedo wall for area denial? No problem. Fire your torps at two or even three different targets in different directions? No problem. Steaming around a corner into the face of an enemy BB and your torps are still on a 40 second cooldown? Just press one button and you are good to go. Remember however that this will not give you an insane output of torps. The real advantage of this consumable is flexibility. So keep these two important advantages in mind for later: concealment and torpedo flexibility. Secondly, I will take a look and directly compaire two high tier DDs to understand the flaws of especially T8 to T10 where I feel IJN DDs are struggeling the most right now. The destroyers that come to mind are the Yuugumo and the USS Fletscher at tier 9. Covering the basics first, Fletcher has the egde in HP, speed and maneuverability while Yuugumo has better concealment. All of these values are however not too different and you could say they are pretty on par. Looking at the guns you immediately see a massive advantage for the Fletcher: 50% more rounds per minute and astronomicly better turret traverse and much more range. HE and AP performence are similar with the Yuugumo having better fire chance and better shell arcs. Overall however the Fletcher just outclasses the Yuugumo in a direct gun duel with much more dpm and even against other ship types Fletcher outperforms Yuugumo in gun capability. And that is not a problem at all. The role of USN DDs is fighting over caps in close quarters combat with other DDs and their toolkit is perfect for this task (stealthy, maneuverable, insane dpm and turret traverse). They can also aid their team with long lasting smokes and long range fire support. The real problem arises if you look at the torpedoes: Speed and range are nearly identical. The Yuugumo torps deal about 10% more damage, but the Fletcher beats the Yuugumo in reload (only a few seconds) while having more torps (2x5 vs 2x4) and one realy important stat: torpedo detectability (1.4km vs 1.7km). I would argue that dealing 10% more damage per torpedo is realy not a big deal at all and gets already accounted for by reloading a bit faster and having more torps to fire. Which leaves the detectibility as the one factor that puts Fletchers torpedo armament above the Yuugumos. But I hear you saying: "Fletcher is one of the best DDs in the game, of course it's overall better than a Yuugumo". Yes, I agree with that. But the fact remains that a USN DD is beating the IJNs speciality. And it's not only the Fletcher. Look at the Z-46, which has massively less damage on its torps (14400 vs 20967), but also reloads his tubes 22 seconds (ca. 20%) faster than Yuugumo while having the same speed and range. The detectability difference is the same as with the Fletcher. So overall you are looking at pretty compairable torpedo armaments while Z-46 still has 50% more shells per minute. And german DDs don't have a good reputation at the moment. We can take this as an example of what the high tier IJN DDs are suffering from. On lower tiers IJN have the best torpedo armament by far. While the USN DDs have kind of crappy range and speed, the Russians have their suicide torpedoes and the Germans are looking pretty good, the IJN DDs already have the capacility to stealth torp with relative ease and good speed. Going up to the higher tiers however, the other nations close the cap in terms of torpedo performence and are overall mostly on par or only a little behind the Japanese. On the other hand the cap in gun performence is still the same. To summerize what we need to keep in mind: lack of speciality at higher tiers and the detectability issue. The Split of the line itself brought some "interesting" changes as well. IJN DDs got better rate of fire while loosing their big alpha damage and fire chance on their HE ammunition. Overall these changes pretty much compensated each other and resulted in only small nerfs or buffs. At least on paper. The higher alpha damage was an advantage when taking shots of opportunity or at getting the jump on an enemy DD undetected. It was some kind of national flavor that got lost with the changes. Overall however by moving some ships down in tier WG mostly replaced ships with better ones. The Akatsuki and Shiratsuyu are definitivly improvements over the old Hastuharu and the same can be said about the Yuugumo replacing the Kagerou. Nevertheless when looking at the current statistics of the new ships we dont see any improvements over the old ones. They are mostly performing on a similar level as before. We can try to explain this by looking and the game in general: There are so much things that have changed over the last year, most of which made the life of destroyers harder. Let me try to explain to anyone who was not part of the closed beta what I mean with that. The Shimakaze for exaple was just a godlike ship. Sailing around the map undetected with the best speed of any ship at the time while launching waves of 15 torpedoes with 20 km range and good concealment on them was hilarious. You would regularly get games with over 100k damage and nobody on the enemy team ever saw you once. It was super easy and totally op and nobody with any sanity wants this back in the game. WG did the right thing and nerfed the Shimakaze. But with the game developing more and more, the Shima and every other IJN DD in the game got slowly but surely indirectly nerfed. Back in the day only aircraft and ships themseves were spotting your torps. Nowadays there is hydro on any number of ships especially since the introduction of the Kriegsmarine and since the captain skills got changed there are much more aircraft floating around. But not only is torpedo play increasingly difficult, your ship itself is in more danger of being sunk. Russian cruisers brought radar in the game and their destroyers are lightning fast with massive firepower. Last but not least RPF made it into the game and while not gamebreaking, it made destroyer life harder. So the meta changed so much that DDs got a harder time staying alive and torpedoes where made less of threat. But IJN DDs did not change and are in a bad state for some time now. Before I state some possible changes that I would suggest to improve the state of IJN DDs, I have some final thoughts. First of all I still like IJN DDs. The torpedo focused playstyle is enjoying for me because it involves so much predicting to be done. Where will all the ships around me be in a minute when my torps are reloaded? Were should I go to be save from enemies but still habe a good ambush position? I understand that WoWs is an arcade game, but why on earth is radar going through islands? I also get that balance is more important than historical facts, but the Japanese used oxygen in their torpedoes because that ensured better range, speed and decetability than the usual torpedo has. Why is every IJN torpedo in the game more visible than any other torpedo? Which bringst me to the final point of my rant: suggestions for improvement of IJN DDs: We learned by looking at different things what makes IJN DDs strong: A good concealment advantage over other DDs and a flexible torpedo armament that outperformes any other nation. They suffer however in exactly that regard by having too large detection ranges on their torpedoes and the fact, that high tier IJN DDs dont excell in their role that much. Shimakazes get outspottet by Fletchers and Gearings (same camo), Yuugumo has not the best torps at T9, etc. Therefore some possible ways to adress these issues are: reduce the detectability of all IJN torpedoes to the same level of other nations make their torpedoes faster than other nations or longer range (high tier; last one is not good for the game) improve their concealment on the ships themself to give them the edge they need over other DDs improve their gun performence by giving them back their old shells and/or better turret traverse (not my prefered approach) give all IJN DDs access to the reload booster consumable in a seperate slot (with rebalancing it, not just a 5 second reload, that would be op; more in the lines of cutting the reload in half once every 5 minutes or so) It just needs one of these things (NOT ALL) to give the IJN DDs back their pride as the pinackle of torpedo ninjas. Thanks for listening to my overly lengthy rant about IJN DDs. Feel free to discuss in a well-mannered fashion.
  3. lord_yggdrasill

    IJN-DDs brauchen Buff

    Dass der höhere Geschosswinkel der Amerikaner die nahezu dreifache RoF, sechsfache Drehgeschwindigkeit und 30% mehr Reichweite ausgleichen soll halte ich für ein bisschen übertrieben Ich erwarte auch keinen gigantischen Buff, grundsätzlich erfüllen die Japaner mit dem ungesehenen Abwerfen von Torpedos eine gute eigenständige Rolle. Die Geschütze können so schlecht bleiben wie sie sind. Die vorgeschlagene Reduzierung der Torpedosichtbarkeit wäre ein willkommener Buff, um die genannte Stärke der Japaner besser hervorzuheben und ihnen das Leben etwas zu erleichtern. Und die guten Spieler werden auch weiterhin den Torpedos schon ausweichen können, bevor sie sie überhaupt sehen. Würde aber sicherlich helfen gegen CAs und BBs, die erst anfangen auszuweichen, wenn sie die Torpedos auch sehen. Zudem würde sich in einem IJN DD vs US DD Kampf nichts ändern und weiterhin der US DD im Vorteil sein, was ja auch so gewollt ist.
  4. lord_yggdrasill

    IJN-DDs brauchen Buff

    Im Angesicht der jüngsten Implementierung von russischen DDs und dem Buff für einige amerikanische DDs erscheinen die japanischen DDs der Stufen 6-9 schwach. Als Beispiel dafür kann man sich mal die beiden Tier 9 Schiffe ansehen: Kagero und Fletcher. Geschütze: Ist eine klare Geschichte: Fletcher hat mit fünf Geschützen, einer RoF von 18 rpm, 180 Grad Drehung in 5,3 Sekunden und einer Reichweite von 12,9 km klar die Nase vorn. Kagero kommt mit sechs Geschützen (sollte man auf das letzte Upgrade verzichten), einer RoF von 6,7 rpm, 180 Grad Drehung in 30 Sekunden und einer Reichweite von 9,4 km daher. Die beiden spielen, was ihre Geschütze angeht, nicht in der selben Liga. Torpedos: Hier ist die Sache deutlich ausgeglichener: Fletcher bringt 2x5 Torpedos mit, die bereits nach 106 Sekunden nachgeladen sind, eine Reichweite von 10,5 km haben, bis zu 19k Schaden verursachen bei einer Geschwindigkeit von 66 kn. Die Kagero hat 2x4 Torpedos, die 120 Sekunden nachladen, eine Reichweite von 20 km haben, 21k Schaden verursachen und mit 67 kn durchs Wasser schießen. Durch die größere Menge an Torpedos und deren schnelleres Nachladen macht die Fletcher hier den Nachteil in Sachen Schaden auf jeden Fall wett. Der Geschwindigkeitsunterschied ist marginal und der Reichweitenvorteil der Kagero ist in der Praxis kaum der Rede wert. Auf 20 km ist jeder Torpedotreffer reines Glück und auch ein Kagero Kapitän wird seine Torpedos eher auf ähnliche Entfernungen wie die Fletcher abwerfen. Zu erwähnen ist auch, dass die 533 mm Torpedos der Flechter später gesehen werden und weniger Zeit zum ausweichen lassen. Insgesamt würde ich sagen, dass beide Schiffe im besten Fall gleich auf sind, was die Torpedo Bewaffnung angeht. Ob nun ein Schiff aufgrund persönlicher Gewichtung die Nase ein bisschen vorne hat ist dabei nicht so entscheidend. Manövrierbarkeit und Verborgenheit: Auch ein recht ausgeglichenes Bild. Die Fletcher ist 1,5 kn schneller und hat den kleineren Wendekreis (560 vs 600m), dafür eine etwas höhere Ruderstellzeit (3 vs 2,7s). Bei der Verborgenheit hat die Kagero mit 6,8/3,8 km die Nase gegenüber der Fletcher (7,4/4km) vorne. Sonstiges: Fletcher hat mehr Lebenspunkte und bessere Flugabwehr. Beides spielt aber für DDs nur eine untergeordnete Rolle. Fazit: Die Geschütze sorgen dafür, dass die Fletcher in einer anderen Liga spielt, der Rest ist ausgeglichen. Ein ähnliches Bild ergibt sich für die anderen DDs der Stufen 6-9 (auf Stufe 9 sicherlich am deutlichsten). Die amerikanischen DDs hatten schon immer die besseren Geschütze und das ist auch in Ordnung. Allerdings fehlt den IJN DDs ein klarer Vorteil. Wenn diese als totale Torpedoboote konzipiert sind, dann ist das ebenfalls in Ordnung. Ich hinterfrage nicht die Rollenverteilung. Allerdings sollte man dann die IJN DDs auch mit überlegenen Torpedos ausstatten. An der historischen Konfiguration mit Geschützen und Torpedos führt kein Weg vorbei, aber ein Buff der RoF wäre beispielsweise eine Maßnahme, um die japanischen DDs in Bezug auf ihre Torpedos deutlicher abzuheben. Auf niedrigeren Stufen klappt dies auch gut und auch auf Tier 10 scheinen die beiden Schiffe ebenfalls eher dem alten Muster US=gute Geschütze und vernünftige Torpedos und IJN=schlechte Geschütze, dafür sehr gute Torpedos zu folgen. TL;DR: Auf den Stufen 6-9 brauchen die japanischen DDs einen Buff für ihre Torpedos, um diese als ihren Vorteil gegenüber den anderen Nationen herauszuarbeiten.
×