TKFF

http://suptg.thisisn...08007436255.jpg v

http://ww2drawings.j...ss/Marat/p1.jpg http://ww2drawings.j...elieu/Right.jpg http://ww2drawings.j...Sleipner/p1.jpg

Fiold, on 20 February 2013 - 12:12 PM, said: But why should he black out the swastika? It is not some Nazi propaganda, but historical information. Don't go crazy with all this anti-nazi stuff. Nazism is one of the worst things in our history, but we can't deny it's existence. German Nazis used swastika and that is a historical fact. No propaganda here - just pure truth. Well that's WG's logic.

Smederevac94, on 23 February 2013 - 03:03 PM, said: Well done mate. Thanks. :) http://ww2drawings.j...s/Rodney/p1.jpg http://ww2drawings.j...a-Castle/p1.jpg http://ww2drawings.j...Audacity/p1.jpg http://ww2drawings.j...of-Wales/p1.jpg

http://ww2drawings.j...ers/Hood/p1.jpg http://ww2drawings.j...s/Exeter/P1.jpg http://ww2drawings.j.../Avenger/p1.jpg http://ww2drawings.j...Warspite/p1.jpg

USS IOWA. ;)

Nice Description for a nice ship. +1 from me. :)

On 27 May 1967 USS TRUXTUN was commissioned as the US Navy's fourth nuclear-powered surface ship following USS BAINBRIDGE (CGN-25), USS LONG BEACH (CGN-9) and USS ENTERPRISE (CVN-65). TRUXTUN made history in 1971 by becoming the first nuclear powered surface ship to visit Yokosuka, Japan. From February 1974 to June 1975 TRUXTUN underwent her first comprehensive overhaul and nuclear refueling at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington. Upon completion of overhaul USS TRUXTUN (DLGN-35) was redesignated as a Nuclear Guided Missile Cruiser (CGN). From September 1982 to July 1984 USS TRUXTUN underwent her final complex overhaul at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard which included upgrading the combat system suite to its final configuration. Displacement 9,127 tons (full load) Length 564 feet Beam 58 feet Max Speed 30-plus knots Power Plant 2 - D2G General Electric nuclear reactors; 2 geared steam turbines, 2 shafts, 60,000 shp Aircraft 1 - SH-2 (LAMPS) Armament Standard Missiles (ER) ASROC 8 - Harpoon (from two Mk141 quad launchers) 4 - MK 46 torpedoes (from fixed single tubes) 1 - Mk42 5-inch/54 caliber lightweight gun 2 - 20mm Phalanx CIWS Combat Systems SPS-48 3D Air Search Radar SPS-49 Air Search Radar SPS-67 Surface Search Radar SQQ-26 Sonar [bow mounted] 1 Mk14 Weapon Direction System 4 Mk76 Missile Fire Control System 1 Mk86 Gun Fire Control System 1 Mk114 ASW Fire Control System 2 SPG-55 Radars SLQ-25 NIXIE SLQ-32 EW system Complement 567 (37 officer, 530 enlisted)

Admiral Hipper. ; )

Nice post,tnx.

http://gb-navy-ww2.n...-RS-REVENGE.gif The "Royal Sovereign" or "Revenge" Class were a slightly smaller and slower version of the "Queen Elizabeth" Class. Two additional ships, Renown and Repulse, were suspended on 26 August 1914 and re-ordered as battlecruisers, while an eighth ship, Resistance, was cancelled on 26 August 1914. Unlike the "Queen Elizabeth" Class, none of the "Royal Sovereign" Class underwent any significant modification between the wars, and by the outbreak of World War II they were somewhat obsolescent and unsuitable for the first line of battle.However, by necessity, some did serve with the battle fleets early in the war. Mostly they were employed as escorts for ocean convoys, as their very slow speed was forever to their detriment. http://gb-navy-ww2.n...-CAMOUFLAGE.jpg Royal Sovereign's wartime camouflage for convoy operations. Note addition of clinker funnel cap. http://gb-navy-ww2.n...B-RS-RS-OLD.jpg Royal Sovereign in her 1920-30's guise. Standard Displacement 28,000 tons Full Displacement 31,000 tons Load 3000 tons Draught 28'6" Beam 88'6" Length 624' Speed 21.5 knots

Demons_Bain, on 12 January 2013 - 11:08 AM, said: Yeah, you missed a spot :Smile_trollface: Where ? :Smile_unsure:

k4mik4zE, on 12 January 2013 - 09:51 AM, said: one Question...the first pic selfpainted in paint? ^^ Yep. : ) Any problems about my paint skill ? :Smile_trollface:

http://gb-navy-ww2.n...NELSON-1928.gif HMS Nelson as completed. Two pom-poms were mounted on each side of the bridge and two on each side of the after director tower. Two main directors controlled the 16" guns, one fore and aft, and there is a rangefinder on the armoured conning tower on the bridge face. There were two low-angle directors forward and two aft for the 6" guns and the 4.7" guns were originally undirected. There was a rangefinder for the 6" guns abeam the funnel. She differed from Rodney in not carrying an aircraft / catapult, had different masts and foretops and carried her boats in different places. http://gb-navy-ww2.n...NELSON-1938.gif HMS Nelson, in 1938. A pom-pom has been added on each side of the funnel, and one on the quarterdeck. There is a quadruple o.5" MG on each side of the bridge and sided just behind it, and a HA director has been added to the foretop. http://gb-navy-ww2.n...NELSON-1940.gif HMS Nelson, in 1940. A 20 barrel 7" UP launcher has been added on "C" and "B" turrets. http://gb-navy-ww2.n...NELSON-1944.gif HMS Nelson, 1944. SW type 273 RDF has been added on the mainmast, SR type 284 on the forwerd 16" director, AR type 285 on the HA director and AW ype 286 on the mastheads. An octuple pom-pom has been added on "B" turret and another pair on each side of the mainmast. About forty-four 20mm AA guns were dotted around the superstructure, including those replacing the single pom-poms, and this figure was later increased to sixty-five by pairing many of them. Radar has replaced the duties of the conning tower rangefiner, and this has been removed and a temporary structure for 20mm AA added. On each side of the bridge, two quadruple US pattern Bofors guns are fitted, for when she will be required in the far-east. http://gb-navy-ww2.n...RODNEY-1928.gif HMS Rodney, newly completed in the early 'thirties. Different masts / foretops define her and her sister, but the main identification feature is the catapult for a Walrus amphibian on "C" turret. A crane to recover it was fitted on the port side of the bridge http://gb-navy-ww2.n...RODNEY-1942.gif HMS Rodney, gaudily camouflaged for Mediterannean deployment in 1942. Carrying the same RDF fit as her sister, she still retains the conning tower director and catapult / aircraft. A pom-pom has been fitted to "B" turret and one on each side of the mainmast, and there are sixteen 20mm AA sprinkled around the superstructure, also replacing tthe single pom-poms, and by 1945 this figure had increased to sixty-one with addition of more single and twin mounts. The aircraft and it's gear was removed in 1943, and the six 4.7" guns replaced by four twin 4" AA, with a second, RDF equipped, director added. The trunkated appearance of the "Nelson" Class resulted from their original design being modified in accordance with the terms of the Washington Naval Treaty. Britain was anxious to build battleships with 16" guns to match the American "Colorado" Class and the Japanese "Mutsu" Class, but was restricted to a standard displacement of 35,000 tons. Thus all the main armament was forward, the secondary armament aft, and the bridge was moved further aft than in the original design to shorten the hull, the armour belt and armoured deck still further. To further save weight, a twin-screw arrangement was adopted, and although the ships had a small turning circle, the use of twin screws, the long forecastle and the tall tower bridge made them very difficult to handle. Also, the triple 16" guns proved troublesome, and were a disappointment when compared with the 15" guns of other British capital ships. Both ships saw considerable action during the war, most notable Rodney who contributed greatly to the demise of Bismarck, pounding her with King George V, disabling her for Dorsetshire to finish off. Winston Churchill saw a place for both ships in his post-war fleet, after they had been re-engined to give them a top speed of 28 knots, but his failure to get re-elected put an end to any such plans.

Can I Haz This Table ? = )

qwerty999, on 03 January 2013 - 11:55 AM, said: AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :Smile_smile: When can we start playing the bèta? Alpha first. =P

Yea,nice screens. Anyways in that wg-news.ru there are MUCH information about WOWS already,only problem is,that information is in russian. I understand russian language,so yea,I know much about WOWS thanks to wg-news.ru. :P

omg so much to read,but It was interesting. ; )

Good job. +1

Matti_pl, on 27 September 2012 - 11:26 AM, said: Nice! But, spoiler is (Not)working as intended :) and when can we expect any renders or graphics of ship ? Will you post info about every ship in tech tree ? Works absolutely fine for me. : )

Tuccy, on 27 September 2012 - 11:38 AM, said: Yes, as time and release of information permit :) I plan to do Katori Soon™, but of course we are ratehr busy today in WoT department so tomorrow is more likely. after that... When any new info emerges, we'll share something :) Re. spoiler not working, afraid it might be a Firefox issue. Ok,big thanks for answer. ;)