Kuraiko

Yo, Wargaming? *knock-knock* (knocking on their heads) Hm, sounds pretty hollow. You still won't change the way the MM works. Oh, and look at this replay. We waited less than 10 secs in queue with two T4 and one T5 and got +3 MM AND unequal ship classes per team. That's the exact opposite of what your "How it works" video describes. So, if it's not supposed to work that way it must be broken. If it's correct you're either lying or have no clue yourself. Care to explain? However, it doesn't really matter at then end of the day. The matchmaker needs to change anyway. So will you do it already? Or is money flowing and that's fine. Better bring more content into the game so there's even more money to make. Guess it's working, eh? What a sad bunch of people you must be. Rich and don't care. You sorry excuse for a gaming company. 20201230_200059_PWSD104-Klas-Horn_13_OC_new_dawn.wowsreplay

How's that still fair? I was hiding behind a rock from the beginning of the match (playing careful, as there were T9s), I had some opportunities to fire myself, BUT the very first salvo that hits me was the Jean Bart one-shotting me out of existence! How's that balanced? Of course he hit the citadel; I'm aware of that. But the same amount of hits to the citadel by a T7 BB wouldn't have killed me immediately. Heck, why didn't he over-pen, anyway? Shouldn't his calibre be to big? Even that doesn't seem to be the case hence the battle wasn't balanced that way either. It's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut! Don't match nuts with sledgehammers, WG! Just stop being weird, okay? I can wait two more minutes in queue if I get a fair match-up. That's bloody fine with me. 20201210_170359_PJSC008-Myoko-1945_46_Estuary.wowsreplay

Yo, just came here after necroing this Thread. Seems I tickled some moderators whatever. Also I didn't bother reading all this sh!t here. Here's (probably) yet another example why WoWS MM is bad. Please pay special attention to how many aircrafts I lost compared to the damage I dealt with them. Nobody can tell me that there's always a perfect way to deal more damage with such a gruesome MM. Sometimes my whole squadron would drop before even attempting to attack the single(!) T9 or T10 enemy vessel. They just smash O and my pilots are like "O my go#!%?&". https://www.dropbox.com/s/wyuifecgfh0zgf0/52_WorldOfWarships64_2020-12-04_01-12-57.png?raw=1 https://www.dropbox.com/s/np46by1r4hjv4ey/53_WorldOfWarships64_2020-12-04_01-13-00.png?raw=1

I do complain even then. It's just boring as well and not as rewarding to sink a ship two tiers below myself than having a "fair" match. You're right. There are other problems. Does WG do something to improve MM? Do they even care, as long money flows? I honestly doubt it. I like the game, but this just makes me angry.

Just leaving this comment here to dig out this thread because that matchmaking problem still exist. It's not necessary to match +2 for there are enough online players. If not, I'd rather wait 5 minutes. Also, if there are not enough players in general to change the current match making, I want to see actual numbers from WG, otherwise there's no good reasoning to keep +2 MM. +0 should be the priority and if less players are in queue +1 should be the maximum match making. Having to fight ships with tiers +2 higher isn't fun, isn't fair and however good a player you are, you'll not be very efficient in such a match where you're on the lower end. A game should be fun and fair. Where's the reasoning behind the current match making? Can WG answer this question? I doubt it.

Time stamp of interest for the replay is 11:00 battle timer. Atago was going to move behind the island for cover and would've been save then. I'll just leave this here without any further comment or opinion. 20200628_215956_PJSC038-Atago-1944_17_NA_fault_line.wowsreplay