Karkong_the_Impaler

So that's your excuse now? Personalized RNG? Nothing to do with showing broadside and getting blapped because being out of position? And I... improved my personalized RNG by... aligning my chakras or what?

Money, being smart and a scrooge all comes in one package. You can even try to melt your finnish sauna and measure in °C

Much less than the average variation - not in a way that someone with 1000 games at tier 10 is a 40%er where he actually would be a 60% player. Yes, win rate with all it's faults, say, lack of moving average and so on.. it's a crutch, but good enough to differentiate good from bad players. That's your idea now? You play ships for five games and leave them be until "the database resetted itself" so you get preferential matchmaking? And still get these results? How does the actually working "git gud" factor into that? Or how I managed to get a decent win rate in 800 games with the Druid, back to back? Your bovine excrement excuses why you suck are insulting to those who don't.

@Aethervoxx this downvoting is really getting to me. I propose you really concern yourself with getting gud in the game, that's much more worthwhile than trying to be a laughingstock in the forum.

I disagree. I just suffer from the symptoms of having an IQ above the room temperature.

Light cruisers and just dodge™? Moskva and try to get BBs to do a long range match? Khabarovsk/French DD with range mod?

That's all you got out of my statement? Nah man, the rigging is limited to give new players at a tier a bit of an easier time. This doesn't explain your performance at tier 10. Your stats are because you are a bad player. It's not a great conspiracy to "put the imbeciles on your team so you lose". It's more "you got put on a team and then the team loses". If I were you, I wouldn't call anyone else an imbecile. Don't get me wrong, there are a lot of bad players around - and even the best players will get teams they won't be able to carry. And even the worst players get carried once in a while or simply the stars align and they got lucky. Edit: This one seems appropriate for this thread. A lot:

Ok, you don't understand calculus of probabilities, I get it. But unlike some social sciences concept it exists and it works. You may consider yourself a good player, only held down by rigged matchmaking and bad teammates - but reality disagrees. Yes, there is some rigging going on, see the WG patent someone dug up - but that's a minor issue, in my opinion. Also, just because you don't understand how it works, the others aren't idiots. Quite the other way around. Also.... This seems to be a recurring theme here. People shooting themselves in the leg by complaining about their team while actually being the liability to the team in the first place. Man, this total lack of self-awareness is cracking me up.... Edit: You know how I know that stats work? I worked up, from yarrr broadside tuberous plant to actually decent. And I did so by getting gud. Yes, you are incapable of doing it, or you would have done so long ago and would now laugh along at the not so good players, claiming bad teams, phases of the moon or whatnot for their misadventures. And you know the first step I needed to take? Realizing I was actually trash.

It's a troll. Probably the same that also runs @Why_Cant_I_Be_You

Can't say why, but I object the pet being listed in the middle between girlfriend and boyfriend.....

The CIS yolos are all dead, the BismarkSniperXXX are alive but suck differently. And this is why you feel that the yolos have a better map awareness? Not only is there nothing to substantiate your claims, now it is getting positively ridiculous.... You might appreciate yolo teammates more than the snipers, and I'm not even sure I disagree, but to assume that one is a better player than the other is far fetched.

But seriously... what did you expect would happen?

Another one.... srsly.... Maybe try one of these, to, you know, align your chakras or something?

Gun reload and thus damage output has been gimped. Wondering if HE is worth it when the DD is smart enough to angle. Torps got better, but I'm not into torpedo cruisers, that's usually way too obvious

I'm not into the intellectual aequivalent of masturbating with a cheesegrater. There is no gain. Then act accordingly.

But I really don't wish for every thread being bollocked by his inane ramblings...

You mean when you don't understand you have a problem with facts? And I use "do not understand" in a quite loose sense here, as it is more a fastmotion'esque willful denial thing. And when you finally and absolutely have nothing else to add, you "still need to determine" what these facts could possibly be? Be my guest, determine away but be prepared that people laugh at your... unfounded hypothesis. Yeah, intellectual feelings - and you are insulting them, again and again. Edit: If you wish to talk to me personally, please do send private messages and don't derail the thread. Thanks.

How about we remove paper? Scissors are just fine. Sincerely, rock. But yeah, considering the amount of facerolling BBabies, I feel this is not entirely implausible that someone would go ahead and ask this.... Also, the amount of DDs willing to suffer supershit CVs, radar everywhere and so on and now submersible scum that spots them to death is getting lower and lower, so it's not soo far fetched - just from a different angle.

Exactly what I was thinking, but I couldn't be arsed to check grammar and recurrent spelling mistakes. @Seraphice should be capable of banning all the accounts from the same computer. I mean, if browsers manage to identify me by the resolution of my monitor and such things, one would think it ain't hard to check the launcher for all the accounts logged in on the same device and ban all them . Ooooh his dad got banned right along? Maybe he can some sense or at least manners into his misbegotten spawn...

Well. Better players have better stats. And the difference if obvioius. Oblivious players broadside because 'hurr durr shoot ALL THE GUNS!', good players notice when you snipe them from 20km away - and not only due to IFA. Trolls like @Why_Cant_I_Be_You intentionally sail to the map border and try to game the not participating mechanic by trying to archieve just the minimum required to not get punished. And guess what? It all shows in the metrics, even if you feel differently. Edit: Even WG uses this metric, FYI: But you really need to somehow align your chakras or something.... your aura is positively scintillating when you really harshly feel that facts don't apply to you.

Try ranked. The sheer amount of bots is staggering. You can be happy if you meet one or two humans.

Speak of the devil... You on the other hand don't have a point, neither in theory nor in practice. To get meaningful results, you need to have enough samples. At about hundred matches, the error is getting smaller - but the more samples, the better. But even then, at 100 matches with Druid, I had a 14% higher win rate with it than I have now after 700 games more. And in between I dipped down below the current 60%+ solo to my chagrin. Also server meta plays a role, so does ping, even when you played which ship, too. On weekends more bad players do random, uncarryable atrocities, bringing you closer to average. For you that's even a good thing. So, basically, a 20% difference is well within the acceptable in this case. This is the usual bovine excrement excuse by bad players, as you have been told before. It's not WG, it's not MM, it's not the phase of the moon, and it certainly isn't your team dragging you down... Your Yoga teacher might be interested, though... The very second you stop lying to yourself is the first step you git gud. As you have been told before - why would you need to improve when you think you already did everything correctly? Look up the thread from a year ago, can't be arsed to post you the links to the guides again...

But don't worry, you're not the only one here in the forums, shooting your own leg by complaining about teammates while being terrible yourself. This has a long and hilarious tradition.