-
Content Сount
637 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
18294 -
Clan
[OHFK]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Shadeshots
-
Are there any new perma camos we can buy for tier X?
Shadeshots replied to anonym_RGvUdEcxWWvD's topic in General Discussion
There has been, every tier x has a perma camo you can buy in game for 5k doubloons, from time to time they sell the space event camos and the go navy eagles/sharks event had perma's for des moines and worcester. If you complete the collections you will also find some alernate colours for tier x perma camos and non perma ones. -
Um well i have 144 ships in ports. But pretty much i keep most ships above tier 7 that i liked.
-
I guessed, just thought id share it for laughs lol
-
I just found it funny lol OP has been edited since your reply lol
-
Witch ship is better, (fletcher or jutland)
Shadeshots replied to Cmdr_Venom's topic in General Discussion
Both are good you cant really compare them as both ships play to certain strengths. -
Idea: Remove citadels from cruisers :)
Shadeshots replied to gyrostabilizer's topic in General Discussion
Nope, terrible idea on every level. And nope they are not the hardest class to play AT all. -
Received a 30% coupon but don t have what to spend it on...
Shadeshots replied to 22cm's topic in General Discussion
I'm more interested to find out why am i now recieving this TINY EXTREMELY LIMITED TEMP ( as it expires in what 3 days?) Coupon, when ive played the bloody game since CBT. What a joke i wouldnt even class it as a thank you gift AT all. Cant even use it on any thing worthwhile.It's like buying someone a thank you box of chocolates then eating them all before handing them over. Not really suprised though to be fair as WG have never cared about their playerbase not ever. -
Obviously no clue how to play DD's the DD' meta right now with the amount counters in the game for them that WG added for you whinge bags in BB's. They have alot to consider. DD's do more work than you ever will when played right and they get nothing but toxic sludge from people like you. I'd even argue alot of DDs that are not as experienced STILL do more work than you, they have to risk alot for very little gain in this game. They get nothing but toxic shite from pottys mouths no matter what they do and they have to do a dam sight more than you do to get anything. DD' as a class is a hard class to play correctly. I'll repeat what i said in another post on a related subject. I suggest you go and play a DD at tier X and tell me how easy or op or w/e it is. If you cant do that for a length of time then you in my opinion have no right to complain about them as you have literally zero experience in how their games end up going.
- 74 replies
-
- 4
-
-
- dds
- destroyers
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
What navy? lol
-
Update 0.7.10 British Destroyers - Discussion Thread
Shadeshots replied to The_EURL_Guy's topic in News & Announcements
The meta game in general is so bad right now id even go as far as to say its the worst ive ever seen since CBT, literally the Jet Aircraft CV's were not even this bad. There is so much radar in this game or stealth detection in general that playing anything that relies on it, ie DD's are completely crucified. They get crucified by their own team for not capturing points etc, when they do they get radared and overkilled then cruicified again for dying. The amount of counters for anything stealth is ridiculous in its current state, which isnt even working realistically based on RL ( i get its an arcade but if your going to add something so game changing do it right). I bet alot of players enjoyment in this game has been completely ruined with the current meta. There is a thread about possible feedback on radar and alot of the ideas on there are doable by a multimillion pound or w/e company. But instead of take some of those ideas and put them into a plan to correct the biggest problem this game has at higher tiers (radar) you planned to limit destroyers per team...... i mean what the actual [edited]. I have zero issue with radar being part of the game if it was corrected to a playable degree but right now its down right overpowered. People complain their are so many BB's in this game and there is, have you ever asked yourself why? Because WG kill every other class in the game so much so that people move to play BB's more because they are not going to die of stress from playing them, they get satisfiactory results per game and they dont need to risk so much to get decent rewards or fun out of a match. Anyone that says DD's are op or broken is a complete and utter moron and has obviously never played the class, and should have no right to even comment on them as they are totally 100% wrong on every level. -
Update 0.7.10 British Destroyers - Discussion Thread
Shadeshots replied to The_EURL_Guy's topic in News & Announcements
Biggest load of crap ive read in a while, BB's are kings of the sea not destroyers, DD's have to risk alot to do anything in this current meta with all you types of players crying for them to get thrown under a bus, where in your precious bb you can camp on the outsides of the map with your thousands of HP points all game still getting a positive return on your game rewards and having fun while doing it. DD's have been countered and nerfed enough in this game. I urge you to take your head out your [edited]and play one at tier 8 or above and see how 'op' they actually are. -
Update 0.7.10 British Destroyers - Discussion Thread
Shadeshots replied to The_EURL_Guy's topic in News & Announcements
Reducing the number of DD's per match, yet keep Radar the same... good balance you got going on there..... do you not think DD's have enough bloody issues to deal with in this game? Radar Hydro Aircraft (CV and Ship) Other DD's CA's with DD Detection range BB AP doing full damage Garbage reward for the amount of risk required to play one The constant nerf after nerf over the years Why not just remove DD's all together if your so inclinded to make their class worse and worse. By countering them in every single way possible without giving them any buffs or help whatsoever in this current piss poor meta. Im honestly losing faith with this game. -
What is the stupidest thing you did today?
Shadeshots replied to piritskenyer's topic in General Discussion
Worst thing?.. hmmm.... played this game, on a Sunday. -
-
I'm glad a few people like it, but Its just an idea of a proposed system they could implement, whether they take my feedback into account is another question, that will remain to be seen as time passes. Ranked does need some serious overhaul though, the system is just so basic. Games become so selfish and so frustrating that the whole thing just becomes a chore more than a fun and rewarding experience. If players had a sense of progress and can see that how they play makes a massive difference (with a point system like my idea) instead of just a straight win/loss scenario, it would encourage better quality players, players could see improvement in how they play and matches for everyone would be of better quality. The same rewards that are in place now would still be there but the whole system in general could be approached differently and in a much better way than it does at the moment, and your blood pressure wouldnt go as high as it does right now. Hopefully they do scroll these forum and grab ideas as there are alot of players on these forums that do have some great ideas for this game in general, and overall it would improve the game quality alot more which at the end of the day we all want. Especiailly on the competitive scene which is why you play ranked in the first place.
-
Yea thats why i kinda left that part for imagination because i didnt really know how you would judge that but WG have all the stats they could work with for that. But for the raising divisions with my idea could be a total of 5 games need to be played, you need to win alteast 3 of those to go up, if you dont do it you drop by idk 20 points or something. The whole idea would reward players that are trying instead of it being doom and gloom, of losing a star and dropping down again, and it would somewhat punish players who are not because they could not progress or they go backwards instead, not forwards. MM could be changed on division aswell so if you are higher than someone in another divisioin you do not play with them. Which then filters it down to you playing games with people of equal skill to yourself, which makes for better quality matches. The whole thing would probably be alot less salty aswell, which we all know this game has a major problem with. But ye just a random thought idea. But unfortunately its not in our power to change it :(
-
One day perhaps they will make ranked more viable its a shame that it is such a mess. But if they put their minds into making it better then they could do alot, there are tons of games out there with ranked structures that work they just need to make the effort. I mean just thinking out loud if they did a point system for example it could look like this: Player 1 is the player making effort to try and win Player 2 is the player not making much effort or ruining the game for teams e.g: Losses Player 1 Lost Game: -10 Personal Performance: 5 End Score: -5 Player 2 Lost Game: -10 Personal Performance: 1 End Score -9 Wins Player 1 Won Game: 10 Personal Performance: 5 End Score: 15 Player 2 Won Game: 10 Personal Performance: 1 End Score: 11 As you can see Player 1 will progress faster, Player 2 will not as they havent made the effort. The personal performance factors could factor in well whatever, im sure you can imagine certain things. They could also add ranked battle divisions similar to clan battles but for ranked play instead of the star. 50 points to go up to next division and as you go higher theres a bigger point gap to rank up division or idk less points rewarded for wins so its more based on individual skill/performance. -50 points drops you back down a division. It probably work alot better than keep star if top thing thats going on. It would possibly encourage players to get more involved in the battle, as its their own performance that gets counted instead of just the match result. (Therefore maybe increasing the quality of games/players as they will be forced to learn if they want to get anywhere instead of being rewarded when it wasnt earned) Just some random idea i come up with but, you get my point, i guess lol.
-
They could take a leap out of War Thunders book and make certain parts of the map too shallow for certain ships.
-
Seeing how terrible the general playerbase has gotten over the years i cant help but understand your furstration, I've also been stuck at rank 6-5. Ranked has always been the same but alteast in previous seasons its was fun as it stands it gets worse and worse every season. WG havent addressed ranked for 10 seasons i doubt they will do any change at all. It should be scored on a point system and ofc wins, but not souly on who wins and loses (decent players cannot choose their team mates and they still might of made the most effort to try and win the match so reward them for performance aswell), ranked needs some serious rework and streamline, that rewards individual players instead of just who wins and loses. Its all down to the MM in most cases that decide if you have a chance of winning or losing, you cannot get randoms to work together and that punishs decent players that deserve higher ranks or who make the most effort to try and progress. If they did it on a point system based on YOUR performance in the match then, instead of just WIN/LOSS, players that refuse to learn the game cannot ruin the game for people that actually do and that actually want to make progress. Just me thinking outloud.
-
Your not alone, ive played this game on and off since the CBT, i played alot more back then than i do now, the level of play is absolutely shocking, thats in random and ranked play. All this game has done is go downhill in player quality literally. Its not just the meta game of camp/lemming or w/e but simple things like people dont play ships to their strenghts for example because people cant be bothered to learn what situations its best suited or what its good and bad at, you also got no teamplay whatsoever. Which makes ranked play specifically terrible. Player quality is at its worse, and its making the game far more annoying than fun these days.
-
Why are rank games such a waste of time.
Shadeshots replied to TurtleSpot's topic in General Discussion
Not sure i quite understand the point of this topic? Alot of what is said in the OP kinda contradicts one another. -
I'll see how it goes i did uninstall avast so if it reappears i will do the check thus far its been ok. (fingers crossed)
-
I get this aswell no idea where its come from its randomly come out of no where and its starting to really tick me off.
-
Ranked: Should the "keep your star if you are best in team if you lose" be removed?
Shadeshots replied to SaintGordon's topic in General Discussion
To the OP's title, i feel it needs to go, because thats all people play for in ranked so theres literally ZERO teamplay most the time because thats all people care about, it basically engcourages selfishness in a team game. -
There is a block feature in this game and a mute, you cant have 1 rule for 1 and another for everyone else. Thats a stupid thing to say regardless of how you look at it.

until