Prophecy82

I dont dare to google....

Oh, I thought you were referring to that post of WWDragon. Lets make 2 things clear: 1. I am absolutely against the Detonation Mechanic. It should just be removed. Especially since you dont even get flags from it. 2. CVs crying "if they remove detonations, then DDs should have citadels" is the behaviour of a spoiled child not wanting others to have the same toy as it has. Besides: giving DDs citadels is beyond stupid I havent done the Math yet, but I guess most cruisers with 203s or higher (at least with IFHE specced) would cause HE-citadels on DDs deleting them in 1-2 good salvoes. BB-HE would be even worse. To your points: 1. Yea, I get your point. For my taste there are still too many CVs but thats my personal opinion. 2. I agree. There are a few CA/CL that can be as influential as DDs but overall you are right. Thats exactly the reason why I pretty much exclusively play DDs in ranked. (The other reason is seeing bad players in DDs throwing their ships away). On the other hand: in CB (even without CVs ) was picking BBs+CAs a viable strat, while picking more then 2 DDs was pretty much a fail all the time. All in all I think its kinda fair. For all the influence you give up a lot in terms of DMG and survivability. Torps are still the most unreliable weapon in game. 3. But what you wanna do about it? You cant exclude bad players from playing DDs. Its still the fault of the player not of the class-design in game.

Für mich spielt es keine Rolle, wie oft bzw. wie hoch die W´keit ist, dass mein Schiff detoniert. Die Mechanik ist im Spiel und ich find es immer ärgerlich wenn es passiert.

Was du nicht wissen kannst, ist, dass seitdem es Flaggen für Credits zu kaufen gibt ich die "fun Steuer" aka Deto Flaggen kaufe. Für ALLE Klassen außer CV. Ansonsten geb ich dir Recht, die Mechanik hat nix verloren in dem Spiel. Zwar ist Dispersion und Co auch RNG und damit "Glückssache", aber am erhaltenden Ende kannst du wenigstens den Schaden mindern oder ganz negieren. Da macht eine Lol-Boom-Mechanik keinen Sinn, da du darauf überhaupt keinen Einfluss hast.

I know. I like the Witcher. This makes Gwynblyat the "White Biatsch", right?

Oh Gawd!!!! The possibilities! GWYNBLYAT

Since you are such an unicum player (I assume thats why you have hidden stats, so you dont get focused to death by these MMM guys), you should know that all classes do questionable things. Yet BBs and high tier cruisers usually tend to get away with it. Why is that? Also: I dont get your point since we were talking about detonations.

1. You forgot CV at the top of the foodchain. 2. Hoping for a RNG based BS-mechanic to solve your "Problem" aka DD is retarded and/or naive. 3. Survivability of DDs is the lowest on all classes. Which leads to these nice battles where one team lost all DDs pretty much auto-lost the game.... and you want to make DDs even weaker or better more prone to an early back to port?!?! This makes no sense at all! Why dont you do a few more battles in DDs? Abuse their "OPness"?

Ein schönes russisches Sprichwort lautet: "Guck nicht hin, dann ist nicht da!" Kann man sich ja mal zu Herzen nehmen...

Expected you from all the most to participate...

Yea, that may correlate with my disgust of that mechanic.

Ok now i'm curious how often do you see a BB detonated? I recall myself being detonated a few times in a BB but its was torpedoes and my sinking was just expedited before the other 3-4 of the spread hit me. I remember two times in Georgia by Yamato/Musashi shells. Was a bit suprised... turned out that fun-tax subsciption ran out without me double-checking it.

Cant bcs its unrelated. And I use the "fun-Flag" on all classes... except CV ofc.

Ah, yes I missed the 4 second interval that you get when you are truly blessed by RNGsus. Tbh. I give a fl fu about historical accuracy in this game. That said: I do ofc know WGs reasoning why CVs are immune to flood, fire and detonations. On the other hand: I pay my "fun tax" aka buying Det. Flags on a regular basis. Why shouldnt the CV?

Lel what? 1. You still are pretty much immune to fire/flood in CV. 2. You know the consequences of DDs having a citadel? Yea, they become oneshots for every cruiser and BB. So thats a big brain Idea to implement that in a class that already has the lowest survivability.

Why? 1. Completely unrelated. 2. Why?

Du findest ganz unten bei den Diagrammen (unter Verteilung Schiffsklassen etc) einen Knopf für "Mehr Diagramme" nutz den mal.

Hast du die Graphen gesamt betrachtet (also seitdem du angefangen hast zu spielen) oder nur den standard-Zeitraum?

Tbh. this time Im actually on WGs side: I think a "unified" flooding-mechanic is better then having 2 seperate Mechanics. Am I happy with DDs lack of bonus DMG due to floods? No.

They have. Doesnt change the fact that the flooding mechanic stays the same.

Persönlich denke ich, dass das wichtigste und beste Maß in den Stats die Graphen sind. Die sollten ähnlich einer Wurzelfunktion aussehen, dann bist du auf dem richtigen weg.

Tbh. a perma flood was pretty much a death sentence for any ship pre-cv-reeework. And thats the point: CVs get the most Torp hits done and cause the most floodings. We wont have those guys even stronger, right?

Solange ich die Wertung im Nachhinein noch einsehen kann, ist es ja nicht so schlimm. Aber dann gar keine Wertung mehr zu sehen geht echt gar nicht. Insbesondere nicht wenn es sich um Ranked handelt! Füttert die Hamster, WG!