Prophecy82

Ich freu mir nen Ast! Wie kann man eigentlich von Rabatten reden, wenn es Sommermarken noch nie zuvor gegeben hat? Sind das etwa ausgedachte Rabatte? *suprised Picatchuface* Neeeein.... kann nicht sein, WG ist seriös!

IIRC Sub_Octavian became lead dev after promising to push thru a CV rework (the original devs had no idea how to balance this class obviously - not that I blame them - ) So you can pretty much blame him for the Rework-BS that happend since. Monetization is not his doing tho.... Thinking of it, ´member those dev-news-videos? Like this one: They pretty much stopped at the same time. Definitely showing that smth. changed.... imo.

I was wondering the same.... I only see 2 Options why this might make more profits: 1. There are very dumb PPL with too much money. 2. WG is exploiting PPL with a gambling addiction.

Hilarious!

I gave them a 2. I mean, WG products are not ransomware or other malicious code (yet).

Or they are just overbuffing them to keep player numbers up... like they did with CVs. About 20% Buffs across the board weapon-wise is for WG an uncanny huge buff.

T6: T-61, Gnevny (personal fetish), Reeujo, FR-DDs T8: Kidd, NorCa, Lexington, maybe Indom (depending on how broken HE-Bombs are vs Subs) T10: Not gonna play it. But if you have to: DM, Radar-Meme-tard, Autism, Marceau or Gozovoi... in the end pretty much any CA/CL or DD will do.

https://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/188?fbclid=IwAR0PVii8d5WfqqH8QXVUZd4gyphdF4M3WCAQyvRrWjhZQFiDQFBtjNjH1kI Extreme Sub-buffs one (?) week before release? What could possibly go wrong? With buffs that extreme... seems like WG is desperate or drunk (probably both).

Like 30% hitratio for BBs you mean? And yea, ofc it sounds silly that a DD can single-handedly burn down a BB. But in both ships sits a player... would be kinda unfair if one ship is immune vs the other, right? Thats why its silly to argument with historical-accuracy in the first place. Obviously your infos are outdated, see @MortuaEst_1 post. Kek, sure sure. But you are missing the point: 1. DDs die early A LOT and thats bcs many players shouldnt play them since they are too bad in them. 2. If you burden DDs -pretty much being exclusively the counter to Subs- with that job and you mix in (1) then you might get that its not a great idea. It just leads to even worse campfests since everyone will camp border in hope to outlast Subs dive capacity so they may finally do smth vs them. Your testing wasnt good enough it seems, since you missed the details in (a). I get that Subs are weak. But its also lame to play against them... so what is the point of the class if their implementation stinks both ways? Guess why you need homing Torps. Bcs the hitratio is so abysmal with normal ones. Yea, but not this way, not with those mechanics. Dont fall for this BS: The "DD-Mafia" is an invention from the CV-Syndicate to scare the BB-Kindergarten and undermine Cruiser-Corporates authority. You DO also know that the RP-Change was made for Subs, not for DDs.

Sorry, but screaming your history lessons doesnt change the facts: 1. This game is an arcade shooter. 2. History is at best "paint" for the game, since WG bends and breaks history (and physics) as they see fit. What remains is a class-mechanic that is: a) Invulnerable to some ships until lategame or given the average time of a ranked battle, not at all. b) Puts another layer of danger and duty to the already overburdened DD class. c) Is lame to play with and against. So, given that, what are the benefits exactly in adding this class to the game?

Yay, were on youtube again!

Exactly. Its lazy design not being able to tweak a ship to your liking... esp. in terms of modules and upgrades. Imo the ship that offers the most variety is Mogami since you have the option to slot 155s and 203s... IIRC its a feature no other ship has. GK and FdG dont count since 420s dont offer anything diverse. On the other hand, given balanz-teams track record it may be for the best....

Madness!

I do belive you. The problem is there is nothing coming back. Nothing from the Devs regarding special topics, nothing on ships like M. Polo could need a buff etc. Its just "we are monitoring it closely" or "we are happy with results" which just translates to "FU you have no clue". Bad Ideas are usually self-regulated by the forumites like Thunderer-range-nerf-whiners, but good ideas... nope "I forward this" (I belive you do) but all that comes back is silence. Tell me: Does WG really hate/are disgusted by their customers so much? Or why is the communication so one-sided in both directions? Like: forwarded ideas ----- here´s the devblog. Seems to me like WG is completely out of touch. So why even write ideas/suggestions/feedback when its a waste of time. LOL, I wrote "remove CVs from CB" in the last feedback (like many others did) and yet, next season there can be two! Hilarious. @Arty_McFly Pls give @YabbaCoe at least the time to read my post before you delete it.

Immerhin klappt gegen DDs immer noch "extreme ultra late breaking"... bei Subs dank homing eher weniger.

How would poor Thunderer do Dmg with its small 450s HE shells.... oh, wait.

Nur um festzustellen, dass er nur auf den gegnerischen CV geht....

Du meinst: DD hunt sub, kill DD and cap and give intelligence data you n00b !

Usually I use my 19pt Ovetchkin on Hill... he´s the DD-Guy. I dont have Anshan, but a Gnevny-exclusive 19Pt Captain.... you can blame research bureau for that

Ibuki cant.

Ask some CA/CL-Boys how their options are to mitigate 450s shells with cruiser dispersion... they really like their chances!

Lässt sich wohl noch nichts sagen.... WG ist extrem sparsam und langatmig wenn es darum geht Buffs zu verteilen. Persönlich finde ich, dass Marco Polo dringender einen Buff vertragen könnte.

Absolutely UNPLAYABLE after Nerf, pls buff!!111!!!

In der Regel sind die high-Tier-Gefechte bereits nach 3-5 Minuten entschieden. Früher konnte man dann vielleicht noch einen Dreadnought rauskriegen und hat entsprechend gespielt. Heute find ich Yolo die bessere Option, da ich keine Lust habe noch länger meine Zeit in einem lahmen und eh verlorenen/gewonnenen Gefecht zu verschwenden.

Gibt es eine Option die Errungenschaften nach Schiffen zu sortieren? Zum Beispiel würde ich gerne wissen, wie viele Dev-Strikes ich mit NorCa gemacht habe, oder wie viele Dreadnoughts mit Nelson. Gibt es so eine Option?